PFD report

Daniel Brian Mervis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Feb 2021•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of an overarching Oxford University drug policy agreed by all colleges
  2. Failure to align disciplinary policy with support for students suffering from drug addiction
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable access to appropriate addiction support
  3. Failure to widely advertise drug misuse policies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Rewrite the student handbook section to clarify confidential addiction support and protection from potential legal or disciplinary consequences.

    Stated by St John's College, OxfordStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 February 2021.
  2. Action

    Run a Welfare week raising awareness of drugs, addiction, drug misuse and available internal and external support, with student representatives.

    Stated by St John's College, OxfordStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 February 2021.
  3. Action

    Participate in the inter-college task-and-finish group through the Principal Bursar and Welfare Dean.

    Stated by St John's College, OxfordStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 February 2021.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of an overarching Oxford University drug policy agreed by all colleges

Wider context from the report

“1. That Oxford University has no overarching policy agreed by all colleges, and that St John’s should encourage the University to develop the same. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to align disciplinary policy with support for students suffering from drug addiction

Wider context from the report

“2. That there is an apparent conflict between St John’s stated policy to deal with utmost severity with those students who misuse or supply drugs, and the apparent support those students who suffer with drug addiction are offered. This conflict may discourage such students to seek help for their addiction out of fear of the consequences, either legal or disciplinary. A policy of the College which is well publicised and stresses the confidential nature of support offered may mitigate this risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable access to appropriate addiction support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to widely advertise drug misuse policies

Wider context from the report

“3. That St John’s drug misuse policies should be more widely advertised for example at Fresher’s week. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rewrite the student handbook section to clarify confidential addiction support and protection from potential legal or disciplinary consequences.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. St John’s will adopt the template policy outlined in response one. In addition to this it will be rewriting the appropriate section of the student handbook to make sure that there is greater clarity about the confidential support that students are able to receive without worrying about any potential legal or disciplinary consequences.”

Source location

2021-0027-Response-from-St-Johns-College-Oxford-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 9 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run a Welfare week raising awareness of drugs, addiction, drug misuse and available internal and external support, with student representatives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. St John’s will make sure that this continues to be included fully in Fresher’s week. In addition, we will run a Welfare week (most likely in 5th week of the first term of the academic year) where, amongst other matters, we will try and raise a broader awareness of drugs, the consequences of addiction and drug misuse, and the support available to students both from within St John’s and from external agencies. We will work with our student representatives to make sure this is as meaningful as possible.”

Source location

2021-0027-Response-from-St-Johns-College-Oxford-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 9 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Participate in the inter-college task-and-finish group through the Principal Bursar and Welfare Dean.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The Conference of Colleges (a forum for the Colleges of the University of Oxford to deal with matters of shared interest and common purpose) has set up a Task and Finish group, to be led by the Master of Pembroke College. The intention is to set up a template policy that all Colleges will be able to adopt. St John’s College will be represented on the working group by the Principal Bursar and the Welfare Dean.”

Source location

2021-0027-Response-from-St-Johns-College-Oxford-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 9 February 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Adopt the template drug policy developed for Oxford colleges.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. St John’s will adopt the template policy outlined in response one. In addition to this it will be rewriting the appropriate section of the student handbook to make sure that there is greater clarity about the confidential support that students are able to receive without worrying about any potential legal or disciplinary consequences.”

Source location

2021-0027-Response-from-St-Johns-College-Oxford-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 9 February 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026