PFD report

Patricia Ann Mellor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Nov 2014•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure to include warnings about cardiac arrest risks in inhalational anaesthetic product information for patients with LQTS
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards
  2. Failure to update guidance to require specific examination of the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance
  3. Failure to update pre-operative assessment guidance to require consideration of drug-induced LQTS before omitting a 12 lead ECG
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include warnings about cardiac arrest risks in inhalational anaesthetic product information for patients with LQTS

Wider context from the report

“There were further communications with the MHRA suggesting that; · The product information for inhalational anaesthetic agents should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS · The product information for other drugs such as 5HT₃ anti-emetics should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS during inhalational anaesthesia · The particular issues with antidepressant agents and LQTS should be highlighted in the regular bulletins from the Agency Furthermore, ████████ reported that recommendations be sent to NICE updating guideline CG3 to; · Instruct anaesthetists to consider drug-induced LQTS in their pre-operative assessment before following the recommendation not to perform a 12 lead ECG · Instruct anaesthetists to specifically examine the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs performed for any indication · To require a 12 lead ECG to be recorded and the QTc to be specifically examined in all patients receiving aged deemed to be of “high” and “intermediate” risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS · ████████ advised that despite the above notifications and recommendations, no action has been taken by these agencies. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update guidance to require specific examination of the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs

Wider context from the report

“There were further communications with the MHRA suggesting that; · The product information for inhalational anaesthetic agents should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS · The product information for other drugs such as 5HT₃ anti-emetics should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS during inhalational anaesthesia · The particular issues with antidepressant agents and LQTS should be highlighted in the regular bulletins from the Agency Furthermore, ████████ reported that recommendations be sent to NICE updating guideline CG3 to; · Instruct anaesthetists to consider drug-induced LQTS in their pre-operative assessment before following the recommendation not to perform a 12 lead ECG · Instruct anaesthetists to specifically examine the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs performed for any indication · To require a 12 lead ECG to be recorded and the QTc to be specifically examined in all patients receiving aged deemed to be of “high” and “intermediate” risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS · ████████ advised that despite the above notifications and recommendations, no action has been taken by these agencies. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update pre-operative assessment guidance to require consideration of drug-induced LQTS before omitting a 12 lead ECG

Wider context from the report

“There were further communications with the MHRA suggesting that; · The product information for inhalational anaesthetic agents should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS · The product information for other drugs such as 5HT₃ anti-emetics should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS during inhalational anaesthesia · The particular issues with antidepressant agents and LQTS should be highlighted in the regular bulletins from the Agency Furthermore, ████████ reported that recommendations be sent to NICE updating guideline CG3 to; · Instruct anaesthetists to consider drug-induced LQTS in their pre-operative assessment before following the recommendation not to perform a 12 lead ECG · Instruct anaesthetists to specifically examine the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs performed for any indication · To require a 12 lead ECG to be recorded and the QTc to be specifically examined in all patients receiving aged deemed to be of “high” and “intermediate” risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS · ████████ advised that despite the above notifications and recommendations, no action has been taken by these agencies. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include warnings about cardiac arrest risks in product information for other drugs used during inhalational anaesthesia in patients with LQTS

Wider context from the report

“There were further communications with the MHRA suggesting that; · The product information for inhalational anaesthetic agents should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS · The product information for other drugs such as 5HT₃ anti-emetics should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS during inhalational anaesthesia · The particular issues with antidepressant agents and LQTS should be highlighted in the regular bulletins from the Agency Furthermore, ████████ reported that recommendations be sent to NICE updating guideline CG3 to; · Instruct anaesthetists to consider drug-induced LQTS in their pre-operative assessment before following the recommendation not to perform a 12 lead ECG · Instruct anaesthetists to specifically examine the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs performed for any indication · To require a 12 lead ECG to be recorded and the QTc to be specifically examined in all patients receiving aged deemed to be of “high” and “intermediate” risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS · ████████ advised that despite the above notifications and recommendations, no action has been taken by these agencies. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate product safety warnings about serious hazards.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to update guidance to require 12 lead ECG recording and QTc examination for patients receiving drugs at high or intermediate risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS

Wider context from the report

“There were further communications with the MHRA suggesting that; · The product information for inhalational anaesthetic agents should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS · The product information for other drugs such as 5HT₃ anti-emetics should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS during inhalational anaesthesia · The particular issues with antidepressant agents and LQTS should be highlighted in the regular bulletins from the Agency Furthermore, ████████ reported that recommendations be sent to NICE updating guideline CG3 to; · Instruct anaesthetists to consider drug-induced LQTS in their pre-operative assessment before following the recommendation not to perform a 12 lead ECG · Instruct anaesthetists to specifically examine the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs performed for any indication · To require a 12 lead ECG to be recorded and the QTc to be specifically examined in all patients receiving aged deemed to be of “high” and “intermediate” risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS · ████████ advised that despite the above notifications and recommendations, no action has been taken by these agencies. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe updating of clinical policies and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to highlight issues involving antidepressant agents and LQTS in regular agency bulletins

Wider context from the report

“There were further communications with the MHRA suggesting that; · The product information for inhalational anaesthetic agents should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS · The product information for other drugs such as 5HT₃ anti-emetics should contain a warning on the potential risks of cardiac arrest when administered to patients with LQTS during inhalational anaesthesia · The particular issues with antidepressant agents and LQTS should be highlighted in the regular bulletins from the Agency Furthermore, ████████ reported that recommendations be sent to NICE updating guideline CG3 to; · Instruct anaesthetists to consider drug-induced LQTS in their pre-operative assessment before following the recommendation not to perform a 12 lead ECG · Instruct anaesthetists to specifically examine the QTc interval in all pre-operative ECGs performed for any indication · To require a 12 lead ECG to be recorded and the QTc to be specifically examined in all patients receiving aged deemed to be of “high” and “intermediate” risk of inducing cardiac arrest in LQTS · ████████ advised that despite the above notifications and recommendations, no action has been taken by these agencies. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.