PFD report

Clare Louise Dupree · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Mar 2026•Avon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
8

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide in-cell automatic fire detection across parts of the prison estate
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable prison fire detection systems
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Deliver approximately 600 additional automatic-fire-detection-protected cells for the highest-risk fire setters across the prison estate.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. Action

    Deliver the national programme installing in-cell automatic fire detection across prison cells, using phased and, where appropriate, AFD-first delivery.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  3. Action

    Maintain interim fire detection and physical airflow mitigations in cells without in-cell automatic fire detection.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Prison capacity and decanting requirements prevent simultaneous or faster installation of in-cell automatic fire detection across the estate.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide in-cell automatic fire detection across parts of the prison estate

Wider context from the report

“At the start of the inquest the MOJ made an admission it said … 1. “The Ministry of Justice has determined that in-cell automatic fire detection (AFD) is necessary to minimise the risk of harm from fires. 2. As at 26ᵗʰ December 2022, cell 59 on Residential 6 was not and is not currently equipped with in-cell AFD 3. For those cells which do not have in-cell AFD, battery powered standalone domestic smoke detectors (DSD’s) are in place outside cell doors, including cell 59 on Residential 6. This was the position as at 26ᵗʰ December 2022. The use of DSD’s as a mitigatory measure was agreed in 2015, in consultation with the Crown Premises Fire Safety Inspectorate. The Ministry of Justice acknowledges that the use of DSD’s in this way is a less effective way of minimising fire risks than in-cell AFD but has adopted them after thorough consideration as being the most effective available means of reducing risk as far as practicable until the installation of in-cell AFD can be completed “ During the inquest evidence was heard from ████████ from HMPPS - that in cell AFD's are now planned for Eastwood Park with a start date of June 2026. I also heard about the position in relation to the prioritisation list for others in the prison estate. That said I also heard the frustration of ████████ from the CPFSI about the time this is taking to implement. The matter of concern therefore … that in cell AFD is still to be implemented/completed at EWP prison and in addition a number of prisons across the prison estate. That the current use of DSD's only seek to mitigate the risks from an in-cell fire. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable prison fire detection systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver approximately 600 additional automatic-fire-detection-protected cells for the highest-risk fire setters across the prison estate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Mini - Fire Safety Improvement (FSI)”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 3 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver the national programme installing in-cell automatic fire detection across prison cells, using phased and, where appropriate, AFD-first delivery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“HMPPS’ national position is that in-cell AFD is necessary to minimise the risk of harm from fire and should be installed within all prison cells. A national resourced programme of work is in place to deliver this, and substantial progress has already been made, with more than 40,000 prison places equipped with in-cell AFD since 2009.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain interim fire detection and physical airflow mitigations in cells without in-cell automatic fire detection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We recognise that risk remains while this estate wide programme is ongoing and HMPPS has therefore taken a number of steps to minimise that risk across the estate. In all cells where in-cell AFD has not yet been installed, battery-powered Smoke Detectors are positioned immediately outside the cell door, which is a mitigatory measure agreed in consultation with CPFSI. Physical mitigations have also been carried out such as ensuring there is sufficient airflow around cell doors to enable smoke to reach the detector in the event of a fire. While we acknowledge that these systems are far from perfect, they provide coverage across the estate during the transition period and have detected over 1,200 fires since their introduction.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver Eastwood Park’s fire safety improvement programme, including in-cell automatic fire detection, smoke ventilation, fire compartmentation and fire-door upgrades.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At HMP Eastwood Park, a full programme of Fire Safety Improvement works has been developed which includes the installation of in-cell AFD alongside wider upgrades to smoke ventilation, fire compartmentation and fire doors. The project has progressed through business case approval and procurement and is currently in its pre-construction phase. Works on site are scheduled to commence in June 2026, with completion expected in Winter 2028. The pace of delivery at this site, as elsewhere, is constrained by the need to safely decant prisoners, with capacity limitations in the women’s estate further restricting the scale and speed of the works.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prison capacity and decanting requirements prevent simultaneous or faster installation of in-cell automatic fire detection across the estate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The implementation of this programme presents significant practical challenges. Installing AFD within prison cells is not a straightforward equipment upgrade; it involves complex infrastructure works, particularly in older custodial buildings. It requires cells and adjacent areas to be decanted for sustained periods, alongside enabling works, construction activity, and subsequent reinstatement. These works cannot be undertaken safely without decanting prisoners, and the prison estate is currently operating close to full capacity. As a result, only a limited number of cells can be taken out of use at any given time, which requires a phased and sequential approach to delivery rather than simultaneous installation across multiple sites. The guiding principle is to do the works as quickly as possible taking out as much capacity as the system can safely spare.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Trial and refine arc-fault detection devices to identify and mitigate electrically initiated fires, including tampering-induced sparking.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  2. 2

    Provide virtual-reality fire-extinguisher training through in-house health and safety trainers to maintain required staff training standards.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  3. 3

    Continue meetings and engagement with CPFSI to review progress on estate fire-safety improvements.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 7 April 2026.
  4. 4

    Operate the Moja safer vape pen initiative to reduce deliberate fires caused by vape pens.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 7 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Trial and refine arc-fault detection devices to identify and mitigate electrically initiated fires, including tampering-induced sparking.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(b) Arc Fault Detention Devices”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 3 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide virtual-reality fire-extinguisher training through in-house health and safety trainers to maintain required staff training standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Virtual Reality fire extinguisher training”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 3 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue meetings and engagement with CPFSI to review progress on estate fire-safety improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We continue to meet with CPFSI to review progress in this area, and engagement between the organisations remains ongoing. At a meeting in late February 2026 between the HMPPS CEO, ████████ and the Chief Inspector, CPFSI expressed support for the change in approach to the delivery of AFD, including the move to an “AFD-first” programme where appropriate, and for the pace at which HMPPS is now working.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 4 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate the Moja safer vape pen initiative to reduce deliberate fires caused by vape pens.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(a) Safer Vape Pen (SVP) project”

Source location

Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
Page 3 · response
Published 7 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026