PFD report

Paul David RANSOM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Jul 2025•Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of guidance on signage following application of thin surface treatments
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for icy and slippery surfacesPart of recurring concern: Inadequate road warning signage
  2. Failure to adapt vehicle speeds to the early-life properties of thin surface treatments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable road-surface grip for vehicles
  3. Unpredictable vehicle behaviour from reduced or changing friction during the early life of thin surface treatments
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable road-surface grip for vehicles
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Share relevant research, learning, best practice and technical guidance on thin surface treatments and road-user safety with members.

    Stated by Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2025.
  2. Action

    Review the specifications, codes of practice and application processes for asphalt preservation systems with specialist members.

    Stated by Road Surface Treatments AssociationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 17 July 2025.
  3. Action

    Meet National Highways to discuss the Coroner’s concerns about asphalt preservation systems in the revised specification documents.

    Stated by Road Surface Treatments AssociationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2025.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.7

  1. Position

    Research and road-user safety issues concerning thin surface treatments should be addressed by the Department for Transport and the Road Surface Treatments Association.

    Stated by Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and TransportRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of guidance on signage following application of thin surface treatments

Wider context from the report

“The resurfacing that had been carried out was an asphalt preservation treatment known as a “thin surface treatment” wherein a bituminous solution is cold sprayed onto the surface, overlaid with a silicate grit. This is a commonly used method. I heard evidence that in the initial period after laying thin surface treatment has a particular property (“early life effects”) in dry conditions the level of friction available can be akin to that of a wet road. There is no guidance that signage be provided. There is also the potential for unpredictable vehicle behaviour, particularly at lower speeds or when road surface temperatures are high, by reason of a change in the level of friction available to a vehicle during a steering manoeuvre or braking. This may have a greater effect on motorcycles. The newly applied surface looks like an ordinary tarmac road albeit pristine. There has been research into accident rates following application of thin surface treatments. The research had the effect of allaying concerns but I was informed that the research may not have been able to look specifically at motorcycle accidents, and further informed that the issue of signage has been the subject of discussion in at least some highways authorities. Thin surface treatments are to be distinguished from surface dressing wherein aggregates are applied, following which loose chipping warning signs are usually erected and a reduced speed limit applied for the days following application. Following thin surface treatment the drivers of vehicles, including motorcycles are likely to assume that in dry conditions the road surface is going to have the same properties as any established dry asphalt road surface. I am concerned that where the road is, for example, downhill and/or twisting and/or with limited sight lines it may be a particular problem if speeds are not adapted for the early life properties of thin surface treatments: particularly in the case of motorcycles. I recommend review of actions to be taken for the safety of road users, particularly motorcycles, following application of thin surface treatments, during the early life phase following thin surface treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for icy and slippery surfaces; Inadequate road warning signage.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to adapt vehicle speeds to the early-life properties of thin surface treatments

Wider context from the report

“The resurfacing that had been carried out was an asphalt preservation treatment known as a “thin surface treatment” wherein a bituminous solution is cold sprayed onto the surface, overlaid with a silicate grit. This is a commonly used method. I heard evidence that in the initial period after laying thin surface treatment has a particular property (“early life effects”) in dry conditions the level of friction available can be akin to that of a wet road. There is no guidance that signage be provided. There is also the potential for unpredictable vehicle behaviour, particularly at lower speeds or when road surface temperatures are high, by reason of a change in the level of friction available to a vehicle during a steering manoeuvre or braking. This may have a greater effect on motorcycles. The newly applied surface looks like an ordinary tarmac road albeit pristine. There has been research into accident rates following application of thin surface treatments. The research had the effect of allaying concerns but I was informed that the research may not have been able to look specifically at motorcycle accidents, and further informed that the issue of signage has been the subject of discussion in at least some highways authorities. Thin surface treatments are to be distinguished from surface dressing wherein aggregates are applied, following which loose chipping warning signs are usually erected and a reduced speed limit applied for the days following application. Following thin surface treatment the drivers of vehicles, including motorcycles are likely to assume that in dry conditions the road surface is going to have the same properties as any established dry asphalt road surface. I am concerned that where the road is, for example, downhill and/or twisting and/or with limited sight lines it may be a particular problem if speeds are not adapted for the early life properties of thin surface treatments: particularly in the case of motorcycles. I recommend review of actions to be taken for the safety of road users, particularly motorcycles, following application of thin surface treatments, during the early life phase following thin surface treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable road-surface grip for vehicles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unpredictable vehicle behaviour from reduced or changing friction during the early life of thin surface treatments

Wider context from the report

“The resurfacing that had been carried out was an asphalt preservation treatment known as a “thin surface treatment” wherein a bituminous solution is cold sprayed onto the surface, overlaid with a silicate grit. This is a commonly used method. I heard evidence that in the initial period after laying thin surface treatment has a particular property (“early life effects”) in dry conditions the level of friction available can be akin to that of a wet road. There is no guidance that signage be provided. There is also the potential for unpredictable vehicle behaviour, particularly at lower speeds or when road surface temperatures are high, by reason of a change in the level of friction available to a vehicle during a steering manoeuvre or braking. This may have a greater effect on motorcycles. The newly applied surface looks like an ordinary tarmac road albeit pristine. There has been research into accident rates following application of thin surface treatments. The research had the effect of allaying concerns but I was informed that the research may not have been able to look specifically at motorcycle accidents, and further informed that the issue of signage has been the subject of discussion in at least some highways authorities. Thin surface treatments are to be distinguished from surface dressing wherein aggregates are applied, following which loose chipping warning signs are usually erected and a reduced speed limit applied for the days following application. Following thin surface treatment the drivers of vehicles, including motorcycles are likely to assume that in dry conditions the road surface is going to have the same properties as any established dry asphalt road surface. I am concerned that where the road is, for example, downhill and/or twisting and/or with limited sight lines it may be a particular problem if speeds are not adapted for the early life properties of thin surface treatments: particularly in the case of motorcycles. I recommend review of actions to be taken for the safety of road users, particularly motorcycles, following application of thin surface treatments, during the early life phase following thin surface treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable road-surface grip for vehicles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share relevant research, learning, best practice and technical guidance on thin surface treatments and road-user safety with members.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst we are not aware of the research you referenced in the report, as a member organisation we will commit to working with the Department for Transport and industry experts such as the RSTA. We will share with our members any relevant research, learning, best practice and technical guidance relating to the application of thin surface treatments and safety of road users. ADEPT is”

Source location

Response from Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning & Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the specifications, codes of practice and application processes for asphalt preservation systems with specialist members.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RSTA and its supplier and contracting specialist member representatives held a meeting to review the Specification, Codes of Practice and processes associated with the application of preservation systems.”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet National Highways to discuss the Coroner’s concerns about asphalt preservation systems in the revised specification documents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are due to meet National Highways to discuss the newly revised specification documents, which will be published in late September/early October.”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 4 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and update the Well Managed Highways Infrastructure Code of Practice to address the report’s recommendations and concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I recognise the seriousness of what has occurred regarding the road surfacing which your report cites as having caused or substantially contributed to the collision involving Mr Ransom, and the need to ensure, as far as possible, there is no recurrence. For that reason, I have committed to undertaking several measures, described below.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider whether signage should identify locations where thin surface treatments have been applied.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I recognise the seriousness of what has occurred regarding the road surfacing which your report cites as having caused or substantially contributed to the collision involving Mr Ransom, and the need to ensure, as far as possible, there is no recurrence. For that reason, I have committed to undertaking several measures, described below.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Research and road-user safety issues concerning thin surface treatments should be addressed by the Department for Transport and the Road Surface Treatments Association.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note that your report has also been addressed to ████████ Minister for the Future of Roads, Department for Transport (DfT) and The Road Surface Treatments Association (RSTA). It is appropriate that these organisations address the matters of concern, namely around the issues relating to any research and safety of road users, following application of thin surface treatments.”

Source location

Response from Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning & Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual councils’ highways maintenance contractual requirements and specifications, and enforcement activities, fall outside the association’s remit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the association does not have a direct role in the design, specification, safety testing or the execution of road surface treatments, we regularly collaborate with the RSTA and provide technical commentary on their work. We do not engage with or comment on individual councils’ highways maintenance contractual requirements / specifications nor do we act as an enforcement body in any way.”

Source location

Response from Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning & Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design, specification, safety testing and execution of road surface treatments fall outside the association’s direct role.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst the association does not have a direct role in the design, specification, safety testing or the execution of road surface treatments, we regularly collaborate with the RSTA and provide technical commentary on their work. We do not engage with or comment on individual councils’ highways maintenance contractual requirements / specifications nor do we act as an enforcement body in any way.”

Source location

Response from Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning & Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Site-specific surveys and risk assessments address gradients, bends, sight lines and any required mitigation, including warning signage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A site-specific survey and risk assessment is completed for all sites prior to treatment, whereby any additional risk factors and mitigation measures that may be required, including that of any signage, are identified.”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Post-treatment skid resistance was above required investigatory levels, contrary to witnesses’ claims that the road was slippery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The site was closed following the collision and Police conducted testing of skid resistance during the closure as part of their collision investigation. Therefore without any vehicle actions, the surface properties would be very similar to that at the time of the collision.”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Independent testing and accreditation ensure restored skid resistance, so asphalt preservation treatments do not require post-treatment signage.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Currently, there is no requirement for post-treatment signage on sites treated with asphalt preservation.”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Local highway authorities are responsible for maintaining their networks and determining maintenance standards based on local knowledge and circumstances.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This government takes the condition of our country’s roads very seriously and is committed to supporting local highway authorities in maintaining the local highway network and keeping it safe. Responsibility for highways maintenance is devolved; the local highway authorities have a duty under Section 41 of the Highways Act 1980 to maintain the highways network in their area. The Act does not set out specific standards of maintenance, as it is for each local highway authority to assess which parts of its network need repair and to what standards based upon local knowledge and circumstance.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Work with the Department for Transport and industry experts on research and safety relating to thin surface treatments.

    Stated by Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning and TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 July 2025.
  2. 2

    Work with ADEPT to raise awareness of thin surface treatment risks and their effects on motorcyclists across the transport sector.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 July 2025.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    The respondent cannot comment on motorcycle-specific collision statistics or studies.

    Stated by Road Surface Treatments AssociationUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. 2

    National Highways compiles the highway specifications and design manuals used by local highway authorities.

    Stated by Road Surface Treatments AssociationRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the Department for Transport and industry experts on research and safety relating to thin surface treatments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whilst we are not aware of the research you referenced in the report, as a member organisation we will commit to working with the Department for Transport and industry experts such as the RSTA. We will share with our members any relevant research, learning, best practice and technical guidance relating to the application of thin surface treatments and safety of road users. ADEPT is”

Source location

Response from Association of Directors of Environment, Economy, Planning & Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with ADEPT to raise awareness of thin surface treatment risks and their effects on motorcyclists across the transport sector.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, I recognise the seriousness of what has occurred regarding the road surfacing which your report cites as having caused or substantially contributed to the collision involving Mr Ransom, and the need to ensure, as far as possible, there is no recurrence. For that reason, I have committed to undertaking several measures, described below.”

Source location

Response from Department for Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The respondent cannot comment on motorcycle-specific collision statistics or studies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Accident Rate Studies not being motorcycle-specific”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 2 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

National Highways compiles the highway specifications and design manuals used by local highway authorities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The specifications (Specification for Highway Works) and design manual documents (Design Manual for Roads and Bridges) are compiled by National Highways as part of their Manual of Contract Documents for Highway Works (MCHW), and these documents are often used by local highway authorities.”

Source location

Response from Road Surface Treatments Association
Page 3 · response
Published 17 July 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026