PFD report

Gladys Esme FURNIVAL (known as Esme FURNIVAL) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Aug 2019•Cheshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of provision to provide updates to other emergency services during significant ambulance delays
    Part of recurring concern: Ineffective communication during medical emergenciesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance emergency escalation and contingency arrangements
  2. Lack of provision to utilise other emergency services during significant ambulance delays
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ambulance emergency escalation and contingency arrangements
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of provision to provide updates to other emergency services during significant ambulance delays

Wider context from the report

“When the ambulance service is faced with significant delays in circumstances where there are no eye’s on the ground, there was no provision to utilise the other emergency services to assist in its place or to provide an update to them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Ineffective communication during medical emergencies; Unreliable ambulance emergency escalation and contingency arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of provision to utilise other emergency services during significant ambulance delays

Wider context from the report

“When the ambulance service is faced with significant delays in circumstances where there are no eye’s on the ground, there was no provision to utilise the other emergency services to assist in its place or to provide an update to them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ambulance emergency escalation and contingency arrangements.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.