PFD report

Stanley Oliver · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 16 Jul 2015•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of out-of-hours availability of GI Radiologists to perform percutaneous cholecystostomy
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable out-of-hours interventional radiology support
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Work with Greater Manchester acute provider trusts to share interventional radiology expertise and improve equitable seven-day access.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 16 July 2015.
  2. Action

    Develop a 1-in-6 non-vascular interventional radiology rota at SRFT to provide seven-day Consultant-level cover by April 2016.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2015.
  3. Action

    Update the Standard Operating Procedure to reflect weekend non-vascular interventional radiology arrangements.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 16 July 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Each local NHS Trust is responsible for providing out-of-hours rotas, availability procedures and staff training in those protocols.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of out-of-hours availability of GI Radiologists to perform percutaneous cholecystostomy

Wider context from the report

“1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that: i. There was no on call rota for a GI Radiologist to perform a percutaneous cholecystostomy out of hours and particularly over a weekend. The Hospital Trust indicated that a risk had been identified in relation to the unavailability of GI Radiologists out of hours and the Hospital that managed the risk by allowing the GI Radiologist to be contacted out of hours but the Trust accepted that there was no provision for the Radiologist to be available out of hours. ii. The Consultant Surgeon gave evidence at the Inquest that availability of a GI Radiologist to perform a percutaneous cholecystostomy was critical to the management of a patient and he raised concerns that there would be a risk to life if a percutaneous cholecystostomy could not be performed out of hours, either overnight or over a weekend. iii. I accepted evidence at the Inquest that the Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust were considering actions to make GI Radiologist available out of hours and to establish a system for any Radiologist to contact a GI Radiologist our of hours for procedures to be conducted out of hours. However there was no confirmation that an out of hours on call rota was being considered for GI Radiologists either within the Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust or for a rota relate to a wider area covering several other hospitals on the basis that an available Radiologist could travel to different hospitals to carry out a necessary procedure out of hours. iv. Evidence was given at the Inquest that the unavailability of GI Radiologists was not limited to Salford but was a national problem in that there were very few out of hours on call rotas for GI Radiologists in hospitals in the United Kingdom. It was accepted that a perforated gall bladder was a recognised condition, which occurred on a regular basis as an emergency presentation to hospital. In some cases surgical intervention would not be appropriate and an alternative treatment plan would involve the insertion of a percutaneous cholecystostomy drain or a drain to be inserted outside the gall bladder, both of which would require insertion by a GI Radiologist. v. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk of future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable out-of-hours interventional radiology support.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with Greater Manchester acute provider trusts to share interventional radiology expertise and improve equitable seven-day access.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The issues highlighted by this case reflect a national shortage of Consultant Interventional Radiologists and are not particular to SRFT with no acute provider Trust in Greater Manchester being able to provide a comprehensive out of hours IR service. We recognise our role in making sure that access to IR is equitable across 7 days not just at SRFT but more widely across GM and we will be working with the other acute provider Trusts across Greater Manchester to ensure expertise is shared.”

Source location

S-Oliver-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a 1-in-6 non-vascular interventional radiology rota at SRFT to provide seven-day Consultant-level cover by April 2016.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The medium term plan is to develop a 1 in 6 non-vascular intervention rota at SRFT to ensure that there is 7 day cover at Consultant level by April 2016. This will involve a number of detailed actions which are described further within the action plan below. Whilst this has”

Source location

S-Oliver-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Standard Operating Procedure to reflect weekend non-vascular interventional radiology arrangements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The short term plan is to continue to use the SRFT ad hoc service with additional support from Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust (CMFT). CMFT plan to have a weekend non-vascular intervention service from October 2015 and have agreed that they will support our service and perform cases that we are not able to safely perform at SRFT at weekends. A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been updated to reflect this change (Appendix 2) and further details can be found in the action plan below.”

Source location

S-Oliver-Response
Page 3 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Each local NHS Trust is responsible for providing out-of-hours rotas, availability procedures and staff training in those protocols.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I note that your letter has been sent to the SRH Trust and I would expect the Trust to fully address these concerns.”

Source location

2015-0281-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 1 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A comprehensive out-of-hours interventional radiology service cannot currently be delivered because of a national shortage of skilled consultant radiologists.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As with many NHS acute provider Trusts across the country, the IR service at SRFT is currently unable to deliver a comprehensive out of hours (OOH) service.”

Source location

S-Oliver-Response
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Provide operational oversight of the interventional radiology action plan through the Clinical Support Services and Tertiary Medicine Division.

    Stated by Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 16 July 2015.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Regulatory bodies are responsible for setting health professionals’ curricula and training standards.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide operational oversight of the interventional radiology action plan through the Clinical Support Services and Tertiary Medicine Division.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Division of Clinical Support Services & Tertiary Medicine will have operational oversight of the action plan and this forms part of the Division’s Risk Register.”

Source location

S-Oliver-Response
Page 4 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Regulatory bodies are responsible for setting health professionals’ curricula and training standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Firstly, I would like to advise that the setting of curricular and standards of training for health professionals is the responsibility of the regulatory bodies. In addition, the actual provision of OOH rotas and procedures to ensure availability of radiologists, and the training of staff in such protocols, is a matter for each local NHS Trust.”

Source location

2015-0281-Response-by-Department-of-Health
Page 2 · response
Published 16 July 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026