PFD report

Patricia Edge · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 10 Dec 2014•Manchester West

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to carry out blood tests to identify excessive paracetamol dosing
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely clinically required blood tests
  2. Lack of review of paracetamol doses
  3. Failure of staff training and Trust procedures to prevent prescribing and dispensing excessive paracetamol doses
    Part of recurring concern: Medication quantity controls failing to prevent unsafe access to excessive amountsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Amend the Medicines Management e-learning module to reflect the improved paracetamol prescribing process and circulate the message continually to clinical staff.

    Stated by Bolton NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 December 2014.
  2. Action

    Review and revise paracetamol prescribing practice to require regular monitoring by the responsible clinical team.

    Stated by Bolton NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 December 2014.
  3. Action

    Distribute the SBAR safety communication to medical staff, wards and services using paracetamol, including through staff newsletters and bulletins.

    Stated by Bolton NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 December 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    All reasonably practicable steps have been taken to improve paracetamol prescribing and address the identified concerns.

    Stated by Bolton NHS Foundation TrustNo action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out blood tests to identify excessive paracetamol dosing

Wider context from the report

“(3) The apparent failure to carry out blood tests between 14ᵗʰ and 19ᵗʰ July, which would have revealed/confirmed the possibility of the dose of paracetamol being excessive, again considering issues of training and procedures. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely clinically required blood tests.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of review of paracetamol doses

Wider context from the report

“(2) The apparent lack of any review of the paracetamol dose between 14ᵗʰ and 19ᵗʰ July 2014. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of staff training and Trust procedures to prevent prescribing and dispensing excessive paracetamol doses

Wider context from the report

“(1) The circumstances – including training of staff and Trust procedures - in which a patient could be prescribed and dispensed an excessive dose of paracetamol on the 14ᵗʰ July 2014. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Medication quantity controls failing to prevent unsafe access to excessive amounts; Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the Medicines Management e-learning module to reflect the improved paracetamol prescribing process and circulate the message continually to clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, the Medicines Management e-learning module has been amended to reflect the improved process and ensure the message is continually circulated to clinical staff.”

Source location

2014-0531-Response-by-Bolton-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 10 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and revise paracetamol prescribing practice to require regular monitoring by the responsible clinical team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Medical Devices Committee and the Medications Safety Group have worked closely to address these issues and the process for prescribing Paracetamol has been thoroughly reviewed. As a result the Trust has now revised its practice and this improvement will ensure that where patients are prescribed Paracetamol there will be regular monitoring by the clinical team responsible for the patient.”

Source location

2014-0531-Response-by-Bolton-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 10 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute the SBAR safety communication to medical staff, wards and services using paracetamol, including through staff newsletters and bulletins.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The attached SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendations) slide details the seven actions taken by the Trust and addresses the three concerns that you have raised. An SBAR is a quality improvement tool which has been adopted by the Trust and is being used as a mechanism to communicate critical information to relevant staff and foster a culture of patient safety.”

Source location

2014-0531-Response-by-Bolton-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 10 December 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

All reasonably practicable steps have been taken to improve paracetamol prescribing and address the identified concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are confident that the Trust has taken all reasonably practicable steps to improve the system of prescribing of Paracetamol in order to address your concerns and I do hope that my response has provided you with the assurance that you and the family are looking for. If you need any further information, or if I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.”

Source location

2014-0531-Response-by-Bolton-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 10 December 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026