PFD report

Joshua Christopher Edward PERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 Apr 2026•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of clarity on the starting point for measuring barrier height when an obstruction is used as guarding
  2. Failure of guarding guidance to address horizontal-railing climbing risks for adults and children over five years
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Conduct a call for evidence on Approved Document K to gather views and consider potential strengthening or clarification of guarding and fall-prevention guidance.

    Stated by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local GovernmentStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 13 April 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity on the starting point for measuring barrier height when an obstruction is used as guarding

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it came to my attention that there is a conflict between The Building Regulations 2010, Guidance: Approved Document K and BSI Standards, barriers in and about buildings, Code of Practice, which requires its resolution and may prevent future deaths. Document K at K2 paragraph 3.2 outlines that guarding must be at a minimum height and that any wall, parapet, balustrade or similar obstruction can be used as guarding. The British Standards, Code of Practice indicates that barriers installed on parapet walls should be measured from the top of the parapet and not at walk level. It is not clear from the guidance and standards whether the starting point of the barrier height is to be taken from when a wall, parapet, balustrade or similar obstruction is used as guarding. Document K at K2 paragraph 3.3 outlines that the use of horizontal railings should be avoided to prevent children under the age of 5 years readily being able to climb the guarding, there is no mention of this also being applicable to adults and children over the age of 5 years. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of guarding guidance to address horizontal-railing climbing risks for adults and children over five years

Wider context from the report

“During the course of the inquest it came to my attention that there is a conflict between The Building Regulations 2010, Guidance: Approved Document K and BSI Standards, barriers in and about buildings, Code of Practice, which requires its resolution and may prevent future deaths. Document K at K2 paragraph 3.2 outlines that guarding must be at a minimum height and that any wall, parapet, balustrade or similar obstruction can be used as guarding. The British Standards, Code of Practice indicates that barriers installed on parapet walls should be measured from the top of the parapet and not at walk level. It is not clear from the guidance and standards whether the starting point of the barrier height is to be taken from when a wall, parapet, balustrade or similar obstruction is used as guarding. Document K at K2 paragraph 3.3 outlines that the use of horizontal railings should be avoided to prevent children under the age of 5 years readily being able to climb the guarding, there is no mention of this also being applicable to adults and children over the age of 5 years. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct a call for evidence on Approved Document K to gather views and consider potential strengthening or clarification of guarding and fall-prevention guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) intends to consider the issues raised through a forthcoming call for evidence on ADK where we will be seeking views to help us understand which areas may need strengthening, greater clarity or further research. This”

Source location

Response from MHCLG
Page 1 · response
Published 13 April 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026