PFD report

Joan RIMMER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Mar 2017•Liverpool and the Wirral

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to distinguish inability to consent from refusal of x-ray
  2. Failure to take physiological readings when assessing physiological response to fracture
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably assess and diagnose injuries
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to distinguish inability to consent from refusal of x-ray

Wider context from the report

“Though there was no evidence that Mrs Rimmer’s death could have been avoided by earlier diagnosis of her fractured hip – the court is concerned that the Community Matron employed by Liverpool Community Health assessed her physiological response to a fracture without taking any physiological readings and further adjudged her to refuse to be x-rayed when a carer witness who was present has explained that the extent of her dementia on the 29th November was so severe she would not understand sufficient to give consent. This in part led to a two week delay before her hip fracture was diagnosed. In another case such standards of nursing could result in an avoidable death not being prevented. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to take physiological readings when assessing physiological response to fracture

Wider context from the report

“Though there was no evidence that Mrs Rimmer’s death could have been avoided by earlier diagnosis of her fractured hip – the court is concerned that the Community Matron employed by Liverpool Community Health assessed her physiological response to a fracture without taking any physiological readings and further adjudged her to refuse to be x-rayed when a carer witness who was present has explained that the extent of her dementia on the 29th November was so severe she would not understand sufficient to give consent. This in part led to a two week delay before her hip fracture was diagnosed. In another case such standards of nursing could result in an avoidable death not being prevented. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably assess and diagnose injuries.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.