PFD report

Rasharn Kirk WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Apr 2015•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of clarity in care-plan criteria for recognising emergencies
  2. Failure to display child-specific medical-condition notices in relevant staff areas
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Amend the medical-needs policy to require clarification of unclear emergency provisions with healthcare professionals.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 29 April 2015.
  2. Action

    Review existing healthcare plans and emergency provisions for clarity.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2015.
  3. Action

    Display photographs and treatment summaries for children with severe medical conditions in the staff and medical rooms.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    It is not possible to display all children subject to healthcare plans; staff working with each child are informed instead.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity in care-plan criteria for recognising emergencies

Wider context from the report

“1. Whilst staff at the school were clear that they should call an ambulance in the case of an emergency, and I heard evidence from the first aider that she would have called an ambulance immediately if she had thought Rasharn was having a seizure, Rasharn’s care plan was not wholly clear on this point. The plan described breathlessness as an emergency. I appreciate that this may have had its origin with Rasharn’s treating clinicians. However, his exercise tolerance was reducing all the time and so breathlessness was, to a degree, a feature of his condition. Extreme breathlessness coupled with low oxygen saturations would be a different matter, but this was not made clear in the plan. This potential lack of clarity did not have an impact on the outcome in this particular situation, but it might in another. It seems that your care plans may benefit from some review to ensure that there is no ambiguity unwittingly created for those attempting to follow them. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to display child-specific medical-condition notices in relevant staff areas

Wider context from the report

“2. I heard that some schools have notices with a child’s photograph and particular instructions regarding medical conditions, displayed in the staff room, office and medical room. Rasharn did have such a notice, but it was only in the medical room, and was not actually displayed at the time of his death, because of transitional arrangements regarding a move of premises. Again, this did not have an impact on the outcome for him, but might for another child. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Amend the medical-needs policy to require clarification of unclear emergency provisions with healthcare professionals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. The policy for the Education for Children with Medical Needs will be amended to include: if an individual Healthcare Plan is not clear as to what is regarded as an emergency for the child and the action to be taken, the member of staff responsible will clarify these provisions with the school nurse and/or the hospital contact identified on the Healthcare Plan.”

Source location

2015-0168-Response-by-Berger-Primary-School
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review existing healthcare plans and emergency provisions for clarity.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. HM Coroner raised concerns regarding clarity of emergency situations on the Child Healthcare Plan. We have undertaken a review of all existing care plans and in particular reviewed the emergency provisions. If the emergency is not clear as to what constitutes an emergency for the child and the action to be taken then the appropriate SENCO will refer the matter back to the school nurse and/or the hospital consultant for clarification.”

Source location

2015-0168-Response-by-Berger-Primary-School
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Display photographs and treatment summaries for children with severe medical conditions in the staff and medical rooms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. The school will ensure that all children with severe medical conditions will have their photograph and a summary of their condition and treatment placed in the staff room and the medical room. This will be based upon those children who have to:”

Source location

2015-0168-Response-by-Berger-Primary-School
Page 1 · response
Published 29 April 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

It is not possible to display all children subject to healthcare plans; staff working with each child are informed instead.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Healthcare Plans affect 15% of the children thus those who work with a particular child with a Healthcare Plan are made aware of that child’s condition and the treatment required. It would not be possible to exhibit all the children who are subject to a Healthcare Plan on the staff room wall and medical room.”

Source location

2015-0168-Response-by-Berger-Primary-School
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2015

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Display photographs of children with food allergies in the kitchen to prevent unsuitable food provision.

    Stated by Recipient name withheldStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 April 2015.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Display photographs of children with food allergies in the kitchen to prevent unsuitable food provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5. In addition children who have food allergies have their pictures in the kitchen so they are not provided with food to which they are intolerant to.”

Source location

2015-0168-Response-by-Berger-Primary-School
Page 2 · response
Published 29 April 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026