Nuel-Junior DZERNJO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Dec 2023•Suffolk

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of clear guidance on the appropriate route of Acyclovir treatment

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Share the report with Agilio Software to raise awareness of the relevant CKS content.

  2. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    Work with paediatric members to improve communication with families and enable parents to share their understanding of a child’s illness.

  3. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    Continue advocating for rapid implementation of the NHS Vaccination Strategy.

  4. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    Share report-derived information and local improvement suggestions with paediatric members through the patient safety portal, including promoting BNFC guidance.

  5. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    Share the report’s information for discussion with the Clinical Quality in Practice group to identify further actions.

  6. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    Engage with NHS England and the Patient Safety Commissioner on national implementation of Martha’s Rule.

  7. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    Maintain the nationally developed paediatric early warning system, including its parental concern trigger for escalating children’s care.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Developing guidance on chickenpox and covering every clinical circumstance falls outside NICE’s requested scope and recommendations.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    The existing Clinical Knowledge Summary recommendation is considered clear about seeking specialist advice and determining intravenous aciclovir admission.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

    Agilio Software is responsible for providing further clarification about the Clinical Knowledge Summary topic’s content.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  4. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    BNFC guidance for intravenous treatment of varicella in immunocompromised children is clear, contrary to the concern that guidance was unclear.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clear guidance on the appropriate route of Acyclovir treatment

Wider context from the report

“During the course of my investigation into the death of Nuel-Junior I instructed an independent paediatric expert to review his management and opine on causation. During the course of hearing the evidence from the expert and all of the treating clinicians it became clear that there was some potentially relevant guidance available but it lacked clarity. Here intravenous Acyclovir, if prescribed, may have prevented Nuel-Junior's death but he was instead prescribed oral Acyclovir which was unlikely to have made a difference. Had clear guidance been available then Nuel-Junior's death may have been prevented. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the report with Agilio Software to raise awareness of the relevant CKS content.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of this process, we have shared this report with Agilio Software for their awareness, however, if further clarification is required on the content of the CKS topic, Agilio software can be contacted directly.”

Source location

Response from National Institure for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with paediatric members to improve communication with families and enable parents to share their understanding of a child’s illness.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College will learn from your report, especially with respect of working with our members on the importance of continually improving how we engage with families in care settings. This includes how paediatricians can better facilitate parents and families to share their understanding of how ill their child is. The College has worked with NHS England and the Royal College of Nursing to develop a paediatric early warning system (PEWS) to spot deterioration.² The new national inpatient PEWS includes a parental concern trigger where parental or carer concern will lead to escalation of the child’s care, regardless of other assessments.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue advocating for rapid implementation of the NHS Vaccination Strategy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The RCPCH supports the recommendation from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation on a universal varicella vaccination programme to be introduced as part of the routine childhood schedule.⁴ We continue to advocate for rapid implementation of the NHS Vaccination Strategy to bring forward opportunities to protect communities and save lives.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share report-derived information and local improvement suggestions with paediatric members through the patient safety portal, including promoting BNFC guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College will be sharing information and suggestions for local improvement from your report with our paediatric members via its patient safety portal, including the promotion of the BNFC guidance to improve awareness across the profession. The information within your report will also be shared for discussion with the RCPCH Clinical Quality in Practice group in early Spring, where further actions may be identified.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the report’s information for discussion with the Clinical Quality in Practice group to identify further actions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College will be sharing information and suggestions for local improvement from your report with our paediatric members via its patient safety portal, including the promotion of the BNFC guidance to improve awareness across the profession. The information within your report will also be shared for discussion with the RCPCH Clinical Quality in Practice group in early Spring, where further actions may be identified.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with NHS England and the Patient Safety Commissioner on national implementation of Martha’s Rule.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College is also engaging with NHS England and the Patient Safety Commissioner on how Martha’s Rule – a new process that stipulates the right to request a second clinical review – will be implemented nationally. This recognises the importance of a structured system that obtains information relating to a patient’s condition directly from patients and their families at least on a daily basis.³”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain the nationally developed paediatric early warning system, including its parental concern trigger for escalating children’s care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The College will learn from your report, especially with respect of working with our members on the importance of continually improving how we engage with families in care settings. This includes how paediatricians can better facilitate parents and families to share their understanding of how ill their child is. The College has worked with NHS England and the Royal College of Nursing to develop a paediatric early warning system (PEWS) to spot deterioration.² The new national inpatient PEWS includes a parental concern trigger where parental or carer concern will lead to escalation of the child’s care, regardless of other assessments.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Developing guidance on chickenpox and covering every clinical circumstance falls outside NICE’s requested scope and recommendations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NICE have not published a guideline on managing chickenpox. We are not asked to develop guidance on all conditions and our recommendations do not cover all clinical circumstances.”

Source location

Response from National Institure for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing Clinical Knowledge Summary recommendation is considered clear about seeking specialist advice and determining intravenous aciclovir admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There is a Clinical Knowledge Summary (CKS) published on our website on chickenpox, including a section on the management of chickenpox in people who are immunocompromised. The CKS are developed by an external company called Agilio Software and are designed to summarise the evidence on the treatment of specific health conditions. They use a variety of sources and may include NICE guidance, if there is any that is relevant, but they use many other sources too. We publish them on our website as a source of advice and information for health professionals working in primary care, but they do not constitute NICE guidance.”

Source location

Response from National Institure for Health and Care Excellence
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Agilio Software is responsible for providing further clarification about the Clinical Knowledge Summary topic’s content.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As part of this process, we have shared this report with Agilio Software for their awareness, however, if further clarification is required on the content of the CKS topic, Agilio software can be contacted directly.”

Source location

Response from National Institure for Health and Care Excellence
Page 2 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

BNFC guidance for intravenous treatment of varicella in immunocompromised children is clear, contrary to the concern that guidance was unclear.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for sharing your report with us regarding the tragic and untimely passing of Nuel-Junior. We were saddened to read the circumstances surrounding Nuel-Junior’s death and have discussed with senior colleagues within the RCPCH and the British Paediatric Allergy, Immunity and Infection Group (BPAIIG). Thank you for confirming in a separate correspondence that the doctors knew that Nuel-Junior was immunocompromised, and that he was initially not particularly "unwell" and presented with typical signs of chickenpox (including a temperature and spots/lesions). You described further that Dr Louis Grandjean, an independent paediatric expert instructed by the court, was of the view that the guidance was unclear.”

Source location

Response from Royal College of Paediatrics and Child health
Page 1 · response
Published 28 December 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026