PFD report

Gary Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 13 Apr 2021•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to inform patients undergoing endoresection of choroidal melanoma of the risk of air embolism and death
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for air embolism during invasive procedures
  2. Failure to advise patients undergoing endoresection of choroidal melanoma to remain hospital inpatients for at least 24 hours
  3. Lack of post-operative checks for air embolism
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for air embolism during invasive proceduresPart of recurring concern: Unreliable post-operative monitoring and clinical review
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Cease undertaking further endoresection procedures of this nature.

    Stated by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 April 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The Trust will not undertake further procedures because it cannot establish the cause of the air embolus.

    Stated by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to inform patients undergoing endoresection of choroidal melanoma of the risk of air embolism and death

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that: (a) Any patient who elects to have an endoresection operation of an choroidal melanoma faces a risk (however small) of air embolism and therefore death. This must be made clear to all patients undergoing such a procedure; (b) There ought to be some check/investigation post operation to determine (or to try and determine as best possible) whether air may have entered the blood stream during the operative procedure; (c) Patients undergoing this operation (which normally lasts between 2-3 hours) should be advised to stay in hospital as an in-patient for at least 24 hours, which would enable careful and extended monitoring of their condition and a swift and informed transfer, if necessary, to an acute care unit of a hospital in the event of a deterioration in their condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for air embolism during invasive procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to advise patients undergoing endoresection of choroidal melanoma to remain hospital inpatients for at least 24 hours

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that: (a) Any patient who elects to have an endoresection operation of an choroidal melanoma faces a risk (however small) of air embolism and therefore death. This must be made clear to all patients undergoing such a procedure; (b) There ought to be some check/investigation post operation to determine (or to try and determine as best possible) whether air may have entered the blood stream during the operative procedure; (c) Patients undergoing this operation (which normally lasts between 2-3 hours) should be advised to stay in hospital as an in-patient for at least 24 hours, which would enable careful and extended monitoring of their condition and a swift and informed transfer, if necessary, to an acute care unit of a hospital in the event of a deterioration in their condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of post-operative checks for air embolism

Wider context from the report

“I am concerned that: (a) Any patient who elects to have an endoresection operation of an choroidal melanoma faces a risk (however small) of air embolism and therefore death. This must be made clear to all patients undergoing such a procedure; (b) There ought to be some check/investigation post operation to determine (or to try and determine as best possible) whether air may have entered the blood stream during the operative procedure; (c) Patients undergoing this operation (which normally lasts between 2-3 hours) should be advised to stay in hospital as an in-patient for at least 24 hours, which would enable careful and extended monitoring of their condition and a swift and informed transfer, if necessary, to an acute care unit of a hospital in the event of a deterioration in their condition. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls for air embolism during invasive procedures; Unreliable post-operative monitoring and clinical review.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Cease undertaking further endoresection procedures of this nature.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As we have been unable to establish the cause of the air embolus, the trust has elected to not undertake further procedures of this nature. We acknowledge your concern and if this procedure is performed at any time in the future we will ensure that patients are informed of the associated risk of death.”

Source location

2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 14 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust will not undertake further procedures because it cannot establish the cause of the air embolus.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As we have been unable to establish the cause of the air embolus, the trust has elected to not undertake further procedures of this nature. We acknowledge your concern and if this procedure is performed at any time in the future we will ensure that patients are informed of the associated risk of death.”

Source location

2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 14 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Trust cannot provide enhanced postoperative monitoring and intensive care support because it lacks the necessary facilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The trust does not have the facilities to undertake the enhanced level of monitoring that patients undergoing this procedure would require. As we have been unable to establish the cause of the air embolus, the trust has elected to not undertake further procedures of this nature. We acknowledge your concern”

Source location

2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 14 April 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Share the completed investigation report with the Care Quality Commission, lead commissioner and commissioning support unit.

    Stated by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 April 2021.
  2. 2

    Undertake broader research into the worldwide prevalence and possible causes of similar air embolism cases.

    Stated by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 April 2021.
  3. 3

    Monitor implementation of agreed improvement actions through internal governance processes.

    Stated by Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 April 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the completed investigation report with the Care Quality Commission, lead commissioner and commissioning support unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am writing in response to the PFD report that you issued on 13 April 2021, following your investigation into the death of Mr Gary Day from an air embolism. This followed a surgical procedure (endoresection of a choroidal melanoma) undertaken on 15 December 2020 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. We have completed our internal investigation and have shared the report with ████████ ████████ next of kin, and her family. Our investigation identified a number of opportunities for improvement and shared learning; implementation of the agreed actions will be closely monitored via our internal governance processes. We have also shared our completed investigation report with the Care Quality Commission and our lead commissioner and commissioning support unit.”

Source location

2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 14 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake broader research into the worldwide prevalence and possible causes of similar air embolism cases.

Verbatim wording from the response

“visibly via the eye, as this would have been observed as a significant volume of air bubbles. However, only occasional small singular bubbles were seen either during surgery, or on subsequent review of a recording of the procedure. There are four explanations for the subsequent development of air embolus that have not been excluded or considered in detail as a possibility during the course of this investigation. Further consideration of these possibilities is warranted, but this will be done as part of a larger piece of research that considers the worldwide prevalence of similar cases. The four possible causes of air embolus have been identified as:”

Source location

2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 14 April 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor implementation of agreed improvement actions through internal governance processes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am writing in response to the PFD report that you issued on 13 April 2021, following your investigation into the death of Mr Gary Day from an air embolism. This followed a surgical procedure (endoresection of a choroidal melanoma) undertaken on 15 December 2020 at Moorfields Eye Hospital. We have completed our internal investigation and have shared the report with ████████ ████████ next of kin, and her family. Our investigation identified a number of opportunities for improvement and shared learning; implementation of the agreed actions will be closely monitored via our internal governance processes. We have also shared our completed investigation report with the Care Quality Commission and our lead commissioner and commissioning support unit.”

Source location

2021-0107-Response-from-Moorfields-Eye-Hospital-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 14 April 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026