PFD report

Rebecca Jodie CURTIS-SMALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 Nov 2014•Exeter & Greater Devon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
4

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 4 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to provide signage warning of specific riptide hazards under varying tide conditions
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate warnings about location-specific hazards at public waterside locations
  2. Failure to ensure easily visible appropriate signage at each beach entrance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Action

    Display prominent safety and information signs at all five access points to Croyde Beach, covering lifeguard availability and key beach hazards.

    Stated by Parkdean Holidays LimitedStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 November 2014.
  2. Action

    Undertake an audit of signs at beaches under the Council’s control and ownership.

    Stated by North Devon District CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 November 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The placement, content and maintenance of Croyde Beach signage are outside the MCA’s responsibility.

    Stated by Maritime and Coastguard AgencyOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide signage warning of specific riptide hazards under varying tide conditions

Wider context from the report

“1. That the appropriate signage is displayed in a way that can easily be seen on each of the entrances to the beach. 2. Whether the sign could refer to any specific riptide hazards known of at the beach in order to warn members of the public using the beach at different times of the year and different states of the tide, that rip tides would be more hazardous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate warnings about location-specific hazards at public waterside locations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure easily visible appropriate signage at each beach entrance

Wider context from the report

“1. That the appropriate signage is displayed in a way that can easily be seen on each of the entrances to the beach. 2. Whether the sign could refer to any specific riptide hazards known of at the beach in order to warn members of the public using the beach at different times of the year and different states of the tide, that rip tides would be more hazardous. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Display prominent safety and information signs at all five access points to Croyde Beach, covering lifeguard availability and key beach hazards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We note the two matters of concern listed in the Regulation 28 Report. The signage that is displayed at Croyde Beach has been designed and erected in agreement with the RNLI and these signs are consistent with signage and information that is provided at several beaches in the North Devon area and elsewhere in England. The signs clearly state whether a lifeguard is on duty at the beach (as this varies depending on the time of year) and identifies the dangers of rip tides, offshore winds, rocks and sudden drops in sea floor. The advice provided by the RNLI relates to the content and layout of the signs and also the number and location of signs erected at the beach.”

Source location

2014-0483-Response-by-Parkdean
Page 1 · response
Published 4 November 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake an audit of signs at beaches under the Council’s control and ownership.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are therefore unable to take any action in respect of Croyde Beach, but in light of the issues you have raised we will be undertaking an audit of signs at the beaches which are under our control and ownership and we also intend to bring this issue to the attention of our partner organisations.”

Source location

2014-0483-Response-by-North-Devon-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 4 November 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The placement, content and maintenance of Croyde Beach signage are outside the MCA’s responsibility.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The exact placement, content and maintenance of the signage at Croyde Beach is not the responsibility of the MCA or the RNLI and I am unable to comment on the historical placement arrangements. With regard to evidence that the signs on this particular beach could have been better placed I do understand that the exact placement of signage is often a compromise due to demands of requirements by planning and local authorities, beach owners or operators or environmental, financial or other constraints.”

Source location

2014-0483-Response-by-Maritime-Coastguard-Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 4 November 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing signage is considered appropriate and sufficient to provide relevant safety information to beach users.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the advice previously provided by the RNLI Parkdean Holidays considers the signage in place is appropriate and sufficient to provide relevant safety information to beach users. However, the company is very willing to discuss the matter further with the RNLI and act upon any recommendations which may be suggested, if any. Parkdean Holidays recognises the importance of ensuring any signage displayed is as clear and user-friendly as possible and is consistent with similar information provided at other beaches in the local area.”

Source location

2014-0483-Response-by-Parkdean
Page 1 · response
Published 4 November 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unable to take action at Croyde Beach because the Council lacks ownership and enforcement powers over private landowners.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I can confirm that the District Council has no ownership interest at Croyde Beach other than the public toilets located at Moor Lane.”

Source location

2014-0483-Response-by-North-Devon-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 4 November 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Bring the signage issues raised to the attention of partner organisations.

    Stated by North Devon District CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 November 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Bring the signage issues raised to the attention of partner organisations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are therefore unable to take any action in respect of Croyde Beach, but in light of the issues you have raised we will be undertaking an audit of signs at the beaches which are under our control and ownership and we also intend to bring this issue to the attention of our partner organisations.”

Source location

2014-0483-Response-by-North-Devon-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 4 November 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/4

Data last updated 7 September 2026