PFD report

Gemma Elizabeth Azhar · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 11 Feb 2020•West Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to ensure consistent communication of the post-cancellation procedure across TTT service areas
  2. Failure to include the post-cancellation procedure in written policy, protocol or induction training
  3. Failure to provide clinical contact and assessment after repeated service cancellations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to actively engage mental health service users before discharge
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Create and implement a formal SOP governing service-cancelled appointments, including duty-therapist escalation after two cancellations.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 February 2020.
  2. Action

    Establish a digital alert process notifying senior therapists when two service appointments are cancelled without clinician contact.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 20 February 2020.
  3. Action

    Disseminate the cancellation procedures to all staff and integrate them into team training and formal induction.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 February 2020.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure consistent communication of the post-cancellation procedure across TTT service areas

Wider context from the report

“Those in need of the TTT service and support may feel discouraged from engaging with the service and be left at risk in the community if, when repeated cancellations occur, they are spoken to only by an office administrator, who is not in any position to enquire about their mental health or make any assessment of their current condition. Indeed ████████, the Clinical Lead for the Time to Talk service in the North Area, of gave evidence at Gemma Azhar’s inquest and informed me that in her view, the service “did not get it right”. She stated that given that the TTT service had cancelled Ms Azhar’s appointment twice, it would have been preferable if there had been attempts made to find her an alternative therapist on 30 September 2019 and, if none was available, for a duty worker to have spoken to Gemma Azhar before she was discharged from the service in order to understand: the reasons for her now declining a third appointment; her current mental state and, if appropriate, seek to engage her and assess her present risk. ████████ informed me that it was now the ‘formal’ position that this should happen after a second cancellation by the service. However, it is a matter of concern to me that staff working in the North area (Horsham, Crawley and Mid Sussex) have only been notified of this ‘formal position’ by an email sent in or around December 2019. This procedure is not part of any written policy or protocol or induction training and therefore new staff in the North area would only learn the procedure by word of mouth. Furthermore, ████████ was not aware whether or not a similar instruction had been given to the Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust’s staff working for the TTT service in other areas. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to include the post-cancellation procedure in written policy, protocol or induction training

Wider context from the report

“Those in need of the TTT service and support may feel discouraged from engaging with the service and be left at risk in the community if, when repeated cancellations occur, they are spoken to only by an office administrator, who is not in any position to enquire about their mental health or make any assessment of their current condition. Indeed ████████, the Clinical Lead for the Time to Talk service in the North Area, of gave evidence at Gemma Azhar’s inquest and informed me that in her view, the service “did not get it right”. She stated that given that the TTT service had cancelled Ms Azhar’s appointment twice, it would have been preferable if there had been attempts made to find her an alternative therapist on 30 September 2019 and, if none was available, for a duty worker to have spoken to Gemma Azhar before she was discharged from the service in order to understand: the reasons for her now declining a third appointment; her current mental state and, if appropriate, seek to engage her and assess her present risk. ████████ informed me that it was now the ‘formal’ position that this should happen after a second cancellation by the service. However, it is a matter of concern to me that staff working in the North area (Horsham, Crawley and Mid Sussex) have only been notified of this ‘formal position’ by an email sent in or around December 2019. This procedure is not part of any written policy or protocol or induction training and therefore new staff in the North area would only learn the procedure by word of mouth. Furthermore, ████████ was not aware whether or not a similar instruction had been given to the Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust’s staff working for the TTT service in other areas. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide clinical contact and assessment after repeated service cancellations

Wider context from the report

“Those in need of the TTT service and support may feel discouraged from engaging with the service and be left at risk in the community if, when repeated cancellations occur, they are spoken to only by an office administrator, who is not in any position to enquire about their mental health or make any assessment of their current condition. Indeed ████████, the Clinical Lead for the Time to Talk service in the North Area, of gave evidence at Gemma Azhar’s inquest and informed me that in her view, the service “did not get it right”. She stated that given that the TTT service had cancelled Ms Azhar’s appointment twice, it would have been preferable if there had been attempts made to find her an alternative therapist on 30 September 2019 and, if none was available, for a duty worker to have spoken to Gemma Azhar before she was discharged from the service in order to understand: the reasons for her now declining a third appointment; her current mental state and, if appropriate, seek to engage her and assess her present risk. ████████ informed me that it was now the ‘formal’ position that this should happen after a second cancellation by the service. However, it is a matter of concern to me that staff working in the North area (Horsham, Crawley and Mid Sussex) have only been notified of this ‘formal position’ by an email sent in or around December 2019. This procedure is not part of any written policy or protocol or induction training and therefore new staff in the North area would only learn the procedure by word of mouth. Furthermore, ████████ was not aware whether or not a similar instruction had been given to the Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust’s staff working for the TTT service in other areas. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to actively engage mental health service users before discharge.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create and implement a formal SOP governing service-cancelled appointments, including duty-therapist escalation after two cancellations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(1) A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been created to confirm the processes to be followed when the Service has cancelled appointments. A separate, existing SOP concerning patients who do not attend or who cancel appointments has also been updated. The updated SOP ensures that cancellations of appointments by patients are identified and includes an additional digital audit system as a weekly measure to monitor numbers.”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a digital alert process notifying senior therapists when two service appointments are cancelled without clinician contact.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new SOP will ensure that administrative staff contact the duty therapist about any patient in circumstances similar to Gemma (where two assessment appointments have been cancelled). This will enable the duty therapist to try to promote engagement and maximise the opportunity for a clinically informed conversation with the patient, with further action taken as necessary. As a further safeguarding measure, a digital alert system, coordinated by the data analysts, will provide a process which will alert senior therapists to”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the cancellation procedures to all staff and integrate them into team training and formal induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The SOP has been reviewed and agreed at the Team Governance Meeting and Area Governance Meeting. It has now been disseminated to all staff via the senior leadership team for each locality and has been integrated into team training and formal induction processes. It is also accessible to all staff via the service shared electronic folder system.”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Establish updated clinical-notes guidance covering consistent documentation of cancellations and identified patient risks.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 February 2020.
  2. 2

    Provide reserved daily assessment slots to enable alternative same-day assessments after service cancellations.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 February 2020.
  3. 3

    Update the existing non-attendance and patient-cancellation SOP and introduce weekly digital auditing of cancellation numbers.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 February 2020.
  4. 4

    Train staff and integrate the clinical-notes SOP into induction, with access through the shared drive.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 20 February 2020.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    The Time to Talk Service is not clinically established to provide urgent support for people with severe mental health conditions or high suicide risk.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. 2

    Patients assessed as needing urgent support are referred to secondary care services run by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

    Stated by Sussex Community NHS Foundation TrustRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish updated clinical-notes guidance covering consistent documentation of cancellations and identified patient risks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(2) Prior to the inquest, work was also carried out on a SOP regarding clinical notes guidance for Time to Talk staff, ratified at the Team Governance Meeting on 26 February 2020 and also reviewed by the Area Governance Meeting on 20th March. This provides updated guidance to all staff on writing clinical and administrative notes on our electronic IPTUS patient record system. It will ensure that information recorded is consistent and comprehensive, including confirmation of the reason for any service cancellation. It also includes guidance on recording any patient risk(s) identified. As above, senior team leads will ensure that all staff are trained and made aware of this process in each geographical area and it will be integrated into induction processes for all staff. All staff will access the SOP via the service shared drive. These actions will be completed by the end of May 2020.”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide reserved daily assessment slots to enable alternative same-day assessments after service cancellations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The new SOP also incorporates a new service resource for patients - reserved assessment slots. These will be offered on a daily basis and ensure that if the service has to cancel an assessment for any reason there will be a number of un-booked slots which can be used to maximise opportunities to offer alternative same day assessments where possible.”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the existing non-attendance and patient-cancellation SOP and introduce weekly digital auditing of cancellation numbers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(1) A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been created to confirm the processes to be followed when the Service has cancelled appointments. A separate, existing SOP concerning patients who do not attend or who cancel appointments has also been updated. The updated SOP ensures that cancellations of appointments by patients are identified and includes an additional digital audit system as a weekly measure to monitor numbers.”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Train staff and integrate the clinical-notes SOP into induction, with access through the shared drive.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(2) Prior to the inquest, work was also carried out on a SOP regarding clinical notes guidance for Time to Talk staff, ratified at the Team Governance Meeting on 26 February 2020 and also reviewed by the Area Governance Meeting on 20th March. This provides updated guidance to all staff on writing clinical and administrative notes on our electronic IPTUS patient record system. It will ensure that information recorded is consistent and comprehensive, including confirmation of the reason for any service cancellation. It also includes guidance on recording any patient risk(s) identified. As above, senior team leads will ensure that all staff are trained and made aware of this process in each geographical area and it will be integrated into induction processes for all staff. All staff will access the SOP via the service shared drive. These actions will be completed by the end of May 2020.”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 3 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Time to Talk Service is not clinically established to provide urgent support for people with severe mental health conditions or high suicide risk.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the evidence given at the inquest by ████████ Clinical Lead, about the role and remit of our Time to Talk Service, it may be helpful to provide some further information. The Time to Talk Service is not a crisis service, and operates a high volume, high throughput model which receives an average of twenty four thousand referrals each year. The service is not clinically established to provide urgent support to people with severe mental health conditions ie. those at a high level of risk of suicide, severe self-neglect, significant self-harm or harm to others, and significant risk which needs monitoring within a”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 1 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Patients assessed as needing urgent support are referred to secondary care services run by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The service is required to see 75% of all referrals within 6 weeks and all patients are routinely informed about how to access more urgent care. If patients have been assessed in Time to Talk with this level of difficulty, or the referral information and any additional information indicates an urgent need, they are referred to secondary care services i.e. the Assessment and Treatment services, run by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SPFT).”

Source location

2020-0026-Response-from-Sussex-Community-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
Page 2 · response
Published 20 February 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026