PFD report

Glenda May Logsdail · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Sep 2021•Milton Keynes

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
4

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
15

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Inhibitory hierarchical structure preventing staff from speaking up during emergencies
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency response leadership and coordinationPart of recurring concern: Ineffective communication during medical emergencies
  2. Lack of awareness of the capnography safety campaign among anaesthesia staff
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable capnography use during intubation and resuscitationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest
  3. Inappropriate delegation of irrelevant tasks during anaesthetic emergencies
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.14

  1. Action

    Work with anaesthetic and respiratory device suppliers to support development of engineered solutions for variable monitor displays and alarm configurations.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Difficult Airway Society and Royal College of AnaesthetistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 September 2021.
  2. Action

    Work with stakeholders to highlight the need for sufficient theatre-team time for essential emergency-drill training.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Difficult Airway Society and Royal College of AnaesthetistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 September 2021.
  3. Action

    Develop multidisciplinary training resources and short scenarios on unrecognised oesophageal intubation.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Difficult Airway Society and Royal College of AnaesthetistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 September 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Standardising multiparameter monitor displays could remove necessary flexibility, create unnecessary monitoring requirements and adversely affect patient safety.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inhibitory hierarchical structure preventing staff from speaking up during emergencies

Wider context from the report

“(5) There was evidence of an inhibitory hierarchical structure which prevented others shouting out. This is despite the fact that I found Dr ████████ to be a mild mannered, gentle and reflective witness. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination; Ineffective communication during medical emergencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of awareness of the capnography safety campaign among anaesthesia staff

Wider context from the report

“(1) I was concerned to find that the anaesthetising Consultant Anaesthetist was not aware of the Royal College of Anaesthetists campaign video “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place”. (2) I became even more concerned when towards the end of the Inquest when I was hearing evidence on the Incident Investigation Report the author, told me he had not been aware of the campaign himself until this incident. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable capnography use during intubation and resuscitation; Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inappropriate delegation of irrelevant tasks during anaesthetic emergencies

Wider context from the report

“(7) The panic and chaos led to an inappropriate delegation of an irrelevant task to a Consultant Anaesthetist who attended to assist who eventually was the one to realise the ET tube was misplaced. This distracted her for a minute or two adding to the time when Mrs Logsdail was not ventilated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to perform confirmatory checks of endotracheal tube placement

Wider context from the report

“(3) As Mrs Logsdail’s condition deteriorated there was no evidence that any confirmatory checks, notably looking for the presence of a capnography trace or expiratory misting, were done to check correct placement of the endo tracheal tube. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe endotracheal tube management.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to reassess possible correctable causes when the patient fails to improve

Wider context from the report

“(4) As Mrs Logsdail deteriorated Dr ████████ erroneously fixated on a diagnosis of anaphylaxis being responsible for the collapse. That fixation was contagious and appeared to compromise the assessments by other staff members who attended to help. Dr ████████ did not go back to basics and consider A(airway), B (breathing), C (circulation) to work his way through possible correctable causes. He told me frankly that he became more and more fixated on anaphylaxis as the cause. Despite treatment for anaphylaxis and Mrs Logsdail’s failure to improve he persisted with this as the diagnosis. His certainty in his diagnosis inhibited other staff members from effectively contemplating other causes until the arrival of another Consultant Anaesthetist. I accept entirely that he was not behaving in a dismissive or aggressive manner. He simply conveyed an infectious certainty which hindered other team members challenging him when several could see that Mrs Logsdail was increasingly cyanosed and in desperate straits. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to consider or reconsider serious alternative diagnoses.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inconsistent ventilator display configurations across clinical areas

Wider context from the report

“(8) I heard that there were variable and different configurations with respect to the displays on the ventilators in different theatres and anaesthetic rooms and ITU through the hospital. This was confusing for staff and had potential to put patients at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe ventilator operation and safety controls.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of emergency team leadership, role clarity and coordination

Wider context from the report

“(6) There was panic and chaos in the anaesthetic room. There was considerable confusion as to roles and there was an absence of a leader dealing with the emergency. Dr ████████ was the natural leader but I found that he was effectively blind to what needed to be done – to check the capnograph and to reintubate. Individual staff members took on roles independently in the cardiac arrest. That is to be commended on an individual level but it betrays a fundamental lack of direction and control of the situation and bodes poorly for management of future life threatening emergencies. The team malfunctioned and did not operate as a team. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of emergency response leadership and coordination.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with anaesthetic and respiratory device suppliers to support development of engineered solutions for variable monitor displays and alarm configurations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In situ multidisciplinary team training for emergency scenarios can also highlight systemic issues that can affect a team’s response in an emergency. Your report highlights the variable configurations of monitors across the hospital as one such issue. We will work with the Association of Anaesthetic and Respiratory Device Suppliers (B arema) to support the development of”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with stakeholders to highlight the need for sufficient theatre-team time for essential emergency-drill training.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report highlights the critical importance of human factors in safe anaesthetic practice. Multidisciplinary team training has an important role to play in rehearsing emergency drills, embedding non-technical skills in practice and allowing teams to learn how to function well as a whole within a flattened hierarchy. Regular, multidisciplinary team training is one of the standards for our Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation (ACSA) scheme. However, in practice, it is a standard that many departments find difficult to meet to an adequate level due to the pressure on theatre time. To support this, we will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop multidisciplinary training resources and short scenarios on unrecognised oesophageal intubation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report highlights the critical importance of human factors in safe anaesthetic practice. Multidisciplinary team training has an important role to play in rehearsing emergency drills, embedding non-technical skills in practice and allowing teams to learn how to function well as a whole within a flattened hierarchy. Regular, multidisciplinary team training is one of the standards for our Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation (ACSA) scheme. However, in practice, it is a standard that many departments find difficult to meet to an adequate level due to the pressure on theatre time. To support this, we will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate key lessons through Royal College, Association and Difficult Airway Society journals, newsletters and social media.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is disappointing that both the anaesthetist involved in the case and the author of the incident investigation report were not aware of the “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place” video. This was published in 2018 and was widely promoted through the RCoA’s, the Association’s and DAS’s communication channels. We recognise that much of this promotional activity was concentrated in a relatively short period of time. We plan for the following coordinated actions to take place over the next year. We will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and promote the “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place” video through professional communication channels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is disappointing that both the anaesthetist involved in the case and the author of the incident investigation report were not aware of the “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place” video. This was published in 2018 and was widely promoted through the RCoA’s, the Association’s and DAS’s communication channels. We recognise that much of this promotional activity was concentrated in a relatively short period of time. We plan for the following coordinated actions to take place over the next year. We will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with operating department and perioperative stakeholders to ensure key messages reach the whole theatre team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is disappointing that both the anaesthetist involved in the case and the author of the incident investigation report were not aware of the “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place” video. This was published in 2018 and was widely promoted through the RCoA’s, the Association’s and DAS’s communication channels. We recognise that much of this promotional activity was concentrated in a relatively short period of time. We plan for the following coordinated actions to take place over the next year. We will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with other Royal Colleges to share key messages with all medical professionals undertaking intubation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is disappointing that both the anaesthetist involved in the case and the author of the incident investigation report were not aware of the “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place” video. This was published in 2018 and was widely promoted through the RCoA’s, the Association’s and DAS’s communication channels. We recognise that much of this promotional activity was concentrated in a relatively short period of time. We plan for the following coordinated actions to take place over the next year. We will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Present key lessons at specified anaesthesia, airway and perioperative educational conferences and meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is disappointing that both the anaesthetist involved in the case and the author of the incident investigation report were not aware of the “Capnography in Cardiac Arrest: No Trace = Wrong Place” video. This was published in 2018 and was widely promoted through the RCoA’s, the Association’s and DAS’s communication channels. We recognise that much of this promotional activity was concentrated in a relatively short period of time. We plan for the following coordinated actions to take place over the next year. We will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Promote and embed the Human Factors guidance for Anaesthesia recommendations in practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In January 2022, the Association and the Difficult Airway Society launched their Human Factors guidance for Anaesthesia. We will work together to promote and embed the recommendations from this guidance in practice.”

Source location

2021-0295 - Response from Royal College of Anaesthetists
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and disseminate multidisciplinary team training resources on oesophageal intubation, including flashcards and short scenarios.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To help embed the key messages of the campaign into practice, and recognising the critical importance of human factors in safe anaesthetic practice, we developed resources for multidisciplinary team training on the subject of oesophageal intubation. One of these resources were a set of flashcards, short scenarios that could be delivered with no need for theatre downtime. The flashcards have been downloaded over 2,000 times. Colleagues at the Royal United Hospital Bath developed a packaged of “tea trolley” training on the subject of oesophageal intubation, which has also been made freely available on our webpage.”

Source location

2021-0295 - Response from Royal College of Anaesthetists
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with anaesthetic and respiratory device suppliers to support engineered solutions for variable monitor display and alarm configurations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report highlighted the variable configurations of monitors across the hospital as a systemic human factors issue. We continue to work with the Association of Anaesthetic and Respiratory Device Suppliers (B arema) to support the development of engineered solutions to the issue of variable and different configurations of the displays and alarms notifications of monitors.”

Source location

2021-0295 - Response from Royal College of Anaesthetists
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop additional multidisciplinary team training resources through the simulation workstream.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will develop more resources for multidisciplinary team training through the RCoA’s simulation workstream.”

Source location

2021-0295 - Response from Royal College of Anaesthetists
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue disseminating key lessons on preventing unrecognised oesophageal intubation through webpages, talks, publications, online resources and social media.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We launched a coordinated campaign to disseminate the key learning points from Mrs Logsdail’s case to our specialty. This included the following actions:”

Source location

2021-0295 - Response from Royal College of Anaesthetists
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain work to prevent unrecognised oesophageal intubation through the Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• We will maintain our work to prevent unrecognised oesophageal intubation through the Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group, which is a collaborative project between the Association of Anaesthetists, the Royal College of Anaesthetists and NHS England.”

Source location

2021-0295 - Response from Royal College of Anaesthetists
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Standardising multiparameter monitor displays could remove necessary flexibility, create unnecessary monitoring requirements and adversely affect patient safety.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The displays of the multiparameter monitors used during anaesthesia have to be customisable so they can accommodate the different types of monitoring devices, which may be required for different types of anaesthesia and surgery being undertaken. This is necessary because the needs of the patient vary according to the complexity of the surgery being undertaken. If there was standardisation, this would either remove this flexibility or require unnecessary monitoring parameters where they are not essential. This in turn would have unintended impacts on patient safety.”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Individual NHS trusts are responsible for delivering emergency simulation and team-based training, subject to available resources and clinical trainer time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to your concerns about multi-disciplinary team working in an emergency situation, you may wish to note that specific simulation-based training for emergency skills and team-based drills in specialised areas of clinical practice, such as the operating theatre, is the responsibility of, and delivered by, individual NHS trusts, based on the”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Request confirmation from UK anaesthetic department Clinical Directors on resource use through an evaluation form.

    Stated by Association Of Anaesthetists (Great Britain & Ireland) and Difficult Airway Society and Royal College of AnaesthetistsStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 September 2021.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The report does not indicate medical-device failure or widespread user error involving anaesthetic and monitoring-device displays.

    Stated by Department of Health and Social CareDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Request confirmation from UK anaesthetic department Clinical Directors on resource use through an evaluation form.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Your report highlights the critical importance of human factors in safe anaesthetic practice. Multidisciplinary team training has an important role to play in rehearsing emergency drills, embedding non-technical skills in practice and allowing teams to learn how to function well as a whole within a flattened hierarchy. Regular, multidisciplinary team training is one of the standards for our Anaesthesia Clinical Services Accreditation (ACSA) scheme. However, in practice, it is a standard that many departments find difficult to meet to an adequate level due to the pressure on theatre time. To support this, we will:”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Anaesthetists_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The report does not indicate medical-device failure or widespread user error involving anaesthetic and monitoring-device displays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The MHRA is the regulator for medical devices in the UK. The MHRA has reviewed your report and has noted that it does not suggest a device failure or widespread user error.”

Source location

2021-0295-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 9 September 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
4/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026