PFD report

Jodie Catherine McCann · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Apr 2023•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
7

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
18

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised7

  1. Failure to record and share airway plans A, B, and C
  2. Failure to follow the Mortality Review policy and complete serious incident reviews promptly
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable formal safety-incident management processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable morbidity and mortality review processes
  3. Limited universal use of NAP4 difficult-airway algorithms and checklists
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.12

  1. Action

    Repeat the airway study day with theory and simulation training on airway management, trolley orientation, intubation checklists, and dislodged tracheostomy management.

    Stated by UHDBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  2. Action

    Use a Critical Care Airway Plan to classify airways and document, display, review, and hand over management plans for patients with difficult airways.

    Stated by UHDBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  3. Action

    Circulate and reinforce procedures for airway care plans, NAP4 algorithms, emergency intubation checklists, and airway management.

    Stated by UHDBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 April 2023.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to record and share airway plans A, B, and C

Wider context from the report

“There is limited evidence to date for the introduction and continuing use of comprehensive airway strategies, with structured planning and preparation, when a difficult airway is anticipated. There should be airway plans A, B, and C recorded, shared, and the equipment and skills to carry them out must be available ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to follow the Mortality Review policy and complete serious incident reviews promptly

Wider context from the report

“The Mortality Review policy was not followed, leading to a significant delay in completing the serious incident review, delaying Trust learning, and delaying the family’s understanding of the circumstances of Jodie’s death. There is limited evidence of progress in implementing the national Patient Safety Incident Response Framework at the Trust ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable formal safety-incident management processes; Unreliable morbidity and mortality review processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited universal use of NAP4 difficult-airway algorithms and checklists

Wider context from the report

“There is limited evidence to date for the universal use of the NAP4 algorithms and checklists, which should be available on the difficult airway trolley, and be familiar to all ICU nursing and medical staff, and to the wider anaesthetic team ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to robustly check difficult-airway trolley equipment daily and replace broken or misplaced key equipment

Wider context from the report

“There is limited evidence to date, for the robust daily checking of all necessary equipment on the difficult airway trolley, to ensure immediate replacement of all key equipment if it is broken or misplaced ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited use of comprehensive difficult-airway strategies with structured planning and preparation

Wider context from the report

“There is limited evidence to date for the introduction and continuing use of comprehensive airway strategies, with structured planning and preparation, when a difficult airway is anticipated. There should be airway plans A, B, and C recorded, shared, and the equipment and skills to carry them out must be available ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable airway management during emergency care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Unavailability of equipment and skills to carry out difficult-airway plans

Wider context from the report

“There is limited evidence to date for the introduction and continuing use of comprehensive airway strategies, with structured planning and preparation, when a difficult airway is anticipated. There should be airway plans A, B, and C recorded, shared, and the equipment and skills to carry them out must be available ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure essential clinical equipment and supplies are available and serviceable; Unreliable airway management during emergency care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Limited progress in implementing the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework

Wider context from the report

“The Mortality Review policy was not followed, leading to a significant delay in completing the serious incident review, delaying Trust learning, and delaying the family’s understanding of the circumstances of Jodie’s death. There is limited evidence of progress in implementing the national Patient Safety Incident Response Framework at the Trust ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to implement the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Repeat the airway study day with theory and simulation training on airway management, trolley orientation, intubation checklists, and dislodged tracheostomy management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2. To complement this, an Airway Study Day was carried out on 22 October 2022 by ████████, Consultant in ICU which contained theory and simulation training around airway management, airway trolley orientation and intubation checklist and management of a dislodged tracheostomy. This airway study day is to be repeated on 21 and 28 June 2023 (this was planned for April but was impacted by the junior doctor strikes);”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a Critical Care Airway Plan to classify airways and document, display, review, and hand over management plans for patients with difficult airways.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following Ms McCann's death, the Intensive Care Unit at Queens Hospital Burton (QHB) has introduced a Critical Care Airway Plan for all patients on the unit. A copy of this care plan is attached and indicates the airway status of each patient indicating whether the patient has a Red, Amber or Green Airway. For patients who have a Red or Amber airway, the clinical teams are responsible for making and documenting an airway management plan. This includes what equipment is going to be required and whether Consultant assistance will be required in the event of an emergency. It is the responsibility of the named Consultant to review this plan on the morning and evening ward round to ensure that the plan is appropriate and up to date.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate and reinforce procedures for airway care plans, NAP4 algorithms, emergency intubation checklists, and airway management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of airway education, the following training events have been carried out:”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide practical airway training for Band 6 and 7 nursing teams and display airway education materials within the unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. A local practical session was carried out on 27 April 2023 for all the Band 6 and 7 nursing teams performed by ████████, Consultant in ICU;”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Agree and establish a Trust-wide incident-management policy and response plan incorporating the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The next key step is to agree a Trust wide process and policy for the management of incidents which incorporates and strengthens PSIRF within the organisation.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Generate and audit 72-hour reports for severe-harm incidents and unexpected deaths to assure proportionate review and compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. For incidents with an actual impact of severe harm/unexpected death or any other incident of concern, these are reviewed at Divisional level and a 72-hour”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Purchase a new intubating bronchoscope and order an additional machine to provide two bronchoscope options in intensive care.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the death of Ms McCann, the ICU at QHB has purchased a new intubating bronchoscope to replace the broken screen and has an order an additional machine so that there are two options for clinicians in terms of use of bronchoscopes. The unit also has a stock of scopes which can be used in conjunction with the screen units and will be compatible with the additional unit that is on order.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 5 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add airway management to the junior doctor induction programme.

Verbatim wording from the response

“4. Airway management is to be added to the junior doctor induction training programme which covers intakes in August and February. This is being developed for the next cohort of trainees by ████████, Consultant and College Tutor;”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue implementing the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework through monthly multidisciplinary implementation work and patient-partner involvement.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Implementation of Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF)”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 8 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and revise the mortality governance policy against neighbouring Trusts, national guidance, and identified failings, then seek governance-group approval.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Review surrounding Mortality Governance Processes and revision of the Monitoring Mortality and Learning from Review Policy”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate the revised mortality review policy through Divisional presentations, Trust learning fora, and the Senior Leaders forum.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A communications strategy is planned to disseminate the revised Monitoring Mortality and Learning from Deaths Review policy which will include presentation to Divisions and discussion at Trust learning fora including the Learning from Deaths”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain airway trolleys with required equipment, NAP4 algorithms, and intubation checklists, supported by daily checks, restocking, and documented compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This airway plan is now displayed above the patient's bed, and the airway trolley containing all vital equipment is stored in each area of the Unit with clear laminated copies of the NAP4 algorithms displayed on the airway trolley.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. 1

    Introduce e-Quip to record medical-device training and competency, with departmental monitoring and Trust oversight.

    Stated by UHDBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  2. 2

    Establish corporate oversight through the Learning Response Review Group and extract and share common incident themes and learning across the organisation.

    Stated by UHDBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  3. 3

    Implement an asset management database providing clinical areas with live equipment records and service information.

    Stated by UHDBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  4. 4

    Operate daily incident-grading reviews and weekly Virtual Incident Review Groups to identify and escalate potentially misclassified incidents.

    Stated by UHDBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  5. 5

    Audit incident grading and analyse lower-harm incident data to identify themes and inform quality-improvement requirements.

    Stated by UHDBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 27 April 2023.
  6. 6

    Commission 360 Assurance to audit the actions taken following the incident.

    Stated by UHDBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 27 April 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce e-Quip to record medical-device training and competency, with departmental monitoring and Trust oversight.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Clinical Engineering Department have also recently introduced e-Quip, which is a medical devices training system. This system enables the Trust to have access to individual and departmental records of all medical devices. This system will allow reports to be generated of department competency percentages. These records will be monitored by departmental leads and will be overseen by the Trust Medical Devices team to monitor compliance. Department leads will be expected to attend Medical Devices Procurement User Group (MDPUG) to present their compliance of all medical devices going forwards.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish corporate oversight through the Learning Response Review Group and extract and share common incident themes and learning across the organisation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Learning Response Review Group, which commenced in January 2023, will enhance organisational learning from safety incidents by providing a corporate oversight of incidents which have been reviewed by the divisional clinical governance teams. Common themes and learning points will be extracted and shared throughout the organisation.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 7 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement an asset management database providing clinical areas with live equipment records and service information.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Currently the Engineering Department provide prompt lists on a regular basis to the clinical area based on information available from the Trust information portals. However, the Trust are in the process of implementing a new asset management database which will allow clinical areas to view their live equipment data. This functionality will be available by the end of 2023 and will provide greater overview for clinical areas as to what equipment should be in the department and when it is due for service.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 4 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Operate daily incident-grading reviews and weekly Virtual Incident Review Groups to identify and escalate potentially misclassified incidents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The corporate clinical governance team issued guidance (Actual impact definitions) in May 2022 to ensure appropriate grading of incidents is undertaken at the time of reporting and through the incident review process. The Divisions carry out a daily review of all incidents which are classed as low or no harm in order to sense check the grading is correct. If there are any concerns about the grading of an incident, this will be escalated and discussed at the weekly Virtual Incident Review Group (VIRG) within each Division, as outlined below.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit incident grading and analyse lower-harm incident data to identify themes and inform quality-improvement requirements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“3. In addition to this, the Corporate Governance Team are currently undertaking an audit of incidents graded as moderate, severe or death as the level of harm to validate the accuracy of grading. The results of this audit will be reported to Quality Review Group in June 2023 for assurance. The Corporate Governance Team are also completing a data analysis on incidents reported as no harm, near miss and low harm in 2022/2023 which will be received by the Quality Review Group in July 2023. This is to look for themes and trends and to inform any quality improvement requirement moving forwards.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 6 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Commission 360 Assurance to audit the actions taken following the incident.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has also retained 360 Assurance to audit the actions taken following this incident.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 27 April 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026