PFD report

Mr. Isaac BAHAR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 Jun 2015•Brighton and Hove

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to ensure locum staff awareness of analgesia guidance for patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate clinician training for safe opioid prescribing and dosingPart of recurring concern: Temporary clinical staff may lack required safety policies and procedures
  2. Failure to prescribe analgesia in accordance with guidance for patients with Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe medication prescribing
  3. Failure of senior nurses to identify medication anomalies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Stop making codeine routinely available for prescription by general surgeons.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 June 2015.
  2. Action

    Continue discussions to determine whether withdrawing codeine from Trust-wide use by other specialists would outweigh the disadvantages.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 15 June 2015.
  3. Action

    Discuss the incident and medication-safety concerns with general surgeons, nursing staff and the pharmacy team.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 June 2015.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Nurses administering the prescription were not expected to recognise the renal-impairment risks requiring them to query it.

    Stated by University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation TrustDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure locum staff awareness of analgesia guidance for patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Wider context from the report

“Mr. Bahar was admitted to the Royal Sussex County Hospital on 10th November 2014 with pneumothorax due to fractured ribs. He was treated urgently and appropriately until his analgesia. He was a man with known Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease, yet in breach of the hospital’s own policy and in breach of national guidance he was prescribed and given four doses of Codeine over 18 hours. Although this was stopped by the ward Pharmacist as soon as she was able to review his drug chart, Mr. Bahar collapsed with severe opiate/opioid toxicity 30 hours later and died just under three hours after the collapse. The Jury at his Inquest found this error to be one of the causes of his death The Codeine was directed by a locum surgical consultant and the fatal error was compounded when a locum junior doctor wrote up the Codeine in Mr. Bahar’s drug chart. Their locum status must be relevant and if the Trust employs locum staff they must satisfy themselves that those staff are aware of such guidance particularly in such a common scenario (elderly patient with Chronic Kidney Disease needing analgesia). The Trust is responsible for ensuring their patients are in safe hands. Senior nurses should also be aware of such common pitfalls. They would then be in a position when caring for their patients to pick up anomalies. This is a serious failing and must be urgently addressed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate clinician training for safe opioid prescribing and dosing; Temporary clinical staff may lack required safety policies and procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to prescribe analgesia in accordance with guidance for patients with Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease

Wider context from the report

“Mr. Bahar was admitted to the Royal Sussex County Hospital on 10th November 2014 with pneumothorax due to fractured ribs. He was treated urgently and appropriately until his analgesia. He was a man with known Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease, yet in breach of the hospital’s own policy and in breach of national guidance he was prescribed and given four doses of Codeine over 18 hours. Although this was stopped by the ward Pharmacist as soon as she was able to review his drug chart, Mr. Bahar collapsed with severe opiate/opioid toxicity 30 hours later and died just under three hours after the collapse. The Jury at his Inquest found this error to be one of the causes of his death The Codeine was directed by a locum surgical consultant and the fatal error was compounded when a locum junior doctor wrote up the Codeine in Mr. Bahar’s drug chart. Their locum status must be relevant and if the Trust employs locum staff they must satisfy themselves that those staff are aware of such guidance particularly in such a common scenario (elderly patient with Chronic Kidney Disease needing analgesia). The Trust is responsible for ensuring their patients are in safe hands. Senior nurses should also be aware of such common pitfalls. They would then be in a position when caring for their patients to pick up anomalies. This is a serious failing and must be urgently addressed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe medication prescribing.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of senior nurses to identify medication anomalies

Wider context from the report

“Mr. Bahar was admitted to the Royal Sussex County Hospital on 10th November 2014 with pneumothorax due to fractured ribs. He was treated urgently and appropriately until his analgesia. He was a man with known Stage 4 Chronic Kidney Disease, yet in breach of the hospital’s own policy and in breach of national guidance he was prescribed and given four doses of Codeine over 18 hours. Although this was stopped by the ward Pharmacist as soon as she was able to review his drug chart, Mr. Bahar collapsed with severe opiate/opioid toxicity 30 hours later and died just under three hours after the collapse. The Jury at his Inquest found this error to be one of the causes of his death The Codeine was directed by a locum surgical consultant and the fatal error was compounded when a locum junior doctor wrote up the Codeine in Mr. Bahar’s drug chart. Their locum status must be relevant and if the Trust employs locum staff they must satisfy themselves that those staff are aware of such guidance particularly in such a common scenario (elderly patient with Chronic Kidney Disease needing analgesia). The Trust is responsible for ensuring their patients are in safe hands. Senior nurses should also be aware of such common pitfalls. They would then be in a position when caring for their patients to pick up anomalies. This is a serious failing and must be urgently addressed. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Stop making codeine routinely available for prescription by general surgeons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This incident, and the sad death of Mr Bahar, has been discussed in detail with both the general surgeons and the nursing team on Level 9a, as well as with the pharmacy team. As a direct result, the general surgeons decided that codeine should no longer be routinely available for them to prescribe. Discussions are continuing to seek a consensus as to whether the benefits of withdrawing codeine altogether from use within the Trust by other specialists would outweigh the associated disadvantages of such a step.”

Source location

2015-0229-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 June 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue discussions to determine whether withdrawing codeine from Trust-wide use by other specialists would outweigh the disadvantages.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This incident, and the sad death of Mr Bahar, has been discussed in detail with both the general surgeons and the nursing team on Level 9a, as well as with the pharmacy team. As a direct result, the general surgeons decided that codeine should no longer be routinely available for them to prescribe. Discussions are continuing to seek a consensus as to whether the benefits of withdrawing codeine altogether from use within the Trust by other specialists would outweigh the associated disadvantages of such a step.”

Source location

2015-0229-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 June 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss the incident and medication-safety concerns with general surgeons, nursing staff and the pharmacy team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This incident, and the sad death of Mr Bahar, has been discussed in detail with both the general surgeons and the nursing team on Level 9a, as well as with the pharmacy team. As a direct result, the general surgeons decided that codeine should no longer be routinely available for them to prescribe. Discussions are continuing to seek a consensus as to whether the benefits of withdrawing codeine altogether from use within the Trust by other specialists would outweigh the associated disadvantages of such a step.”

Source location

2015-0229-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 June 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Nurses administering the prescription were not expected to recognise the renal-impairment risks requiring them to query it.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Codeine was also used on the gastroenterology ward where Mr Bahar was a patient to help reduce diarrhoea, a common symptom for gastroenterology patients. The lead pharmacist has confirmed that she would not expect nurses to be aware of the nuances of codeine metabolism in patients with renal impairment, and there was therefore no reason for the nurses administering the prescription to query this prescription before administering it.”

Source location

2015-0229-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 June 2015

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The medication error was not caused or contributed to by inadequate knowledge, education, or locum staff selection and induction.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust’s lead pharmacist in patient safety carried out a detailed investigation of this matter. She found no evidence that there was a failure in knowledge or education, or any failure in selection or induction of locum staff, which caused or contributed to the medication being prescribed outside the Trust’s recommended analgesia guidance. The British National Formulary (BNF) makes it clear that codeine and other opioid analgesics should be avoided or used with caution at reduced doses in patients with renal impairment.”

Source location

2015-0229-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 15 June 2015

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026