PFD report

Jennifer Lydia Campbell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 24 Oct 2023•North West Wales

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
9

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Lack of clarity about which incidents require investigation
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate safety incident investigations
  2. Patient referrals remaining paper based
  3. Failure to audit for other lost patient referrals
    Part of recurring concern: Failure of care and safety auditing to identify deficiencies
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. Action

    Implement referral safeguards requiring endoscopy referrals to be scanned, recorded on WPAS, and routed through booking clerks.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 November 2023.
  2. Action

    Review the Health Board incident process through staff co-design.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2023.
  3. Action

    Introduce a revised incident process and staff training programme, including triangulation of information from all sources, by April 2024.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 November 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The Health Board did not receive medical examiner concerns before the inquest because no scrutiny document had been created at the time.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of clarity about which incidents require investigation

Wider context from the report

“a. There was no evidence of any formal investigation having been undertaken into how the referral for ERCP became lost. It appears that only during the course of Inquest proceedings did the issue relating to the lost referral become known to the Health Board. Even once it became known to them in 2022 there was still no investigation undertaken. It is not understood at all which incidents that occur are to be investigated. I have issued a number of Prevention of Future Death Reports relating to investigations and governance and yet these concerns continue. I am not in any way satisfied that improvements have occurred. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Patient referrals remaining paper based

Wider context from the report

“e. Evidence was heard relating to electronic notes and referrals. Such referrals remain paper based and there is no indication as yet when these will be fully electronic. I am aware that this national strategy is ongoing but the time it is taking is putting patients’ lives at risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to audit for other lost patient referrals

Wider context from the report

“c. There was no evidence that any audits had taken place to review whether any other patients’ referrals had become ‘lost’. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure of care and safety auditing to identify deficiencies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to formally investigate lost referrals

Wider context from the report

“a. There was no evidence of any formal investigation having been undertaken into how the referral for ERCP became lost. It appears that only during the course of Inquest proceedings did the issue relating to the lost referral become known to the Health Board. Even once it became known to them in 2022 there was still no investigation undertaken. It is not understood at all which incidents that occur are to be investigated. I have issued a number of Prevention of Future Death Reports relating to investigations and governance and yet these concerns continue. I am not in any way satisfied that improvements have occurred. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate safety incident investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to establish awareness and action on Medical Examiner concerns

Wider context from the report

“d. Matters relating to the ERCP which did not take place were identified by the Medical Examiners in their report dated 4 days after the deceased’s death. There was no evidence as to whether the Health Board had been made aware of the concerns therein and if so, what action they had undertaken as a result. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Medical Examiner processes for reviewing deaths and acting on concerns.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to implement learning and improvement after incidents

Wider context from the report

“b. Given that no investigation was conducted to understand how the issue may have occurred there has been no learning, change or improvement to ensure it is not repeated. I have been provided with no assurances in this regard. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement referral safeguards requiring endoscopy referrals to be scanned, recorded on WPAS, and routed through booking clerks.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following this incident, I can however confirm there has been learning and we have made improvements. A new standing operating procedure for all endoscopy referrals has been implemented in November 2023 to ensure all paper referrals are scanned into the endoscopy email inbox, even if received in a paper format by the endoscopy booking clerks. An audit has been completed of referral forms dating 01 October 2021 to 30 November 2023 to ensure no other forms have been lost.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the Health Board incident process through staff co-design.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to the first concern, we fully acknowledge that no incident was reported regarding the missing referral form and as such the incident review process did not take place. We are taking steps to ensure staff are aware of the need to report an incident in these situations through awareness and reminders. We are also undertaking a full review of the incident process in the Health Board, in co-design with our staff, and will introduce a new process and procedure for April 2024. This new process will include a revised training programme for staff.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a revised incident process and staff training programme, including triangulation of information from all sources, by April 2024.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to the first concern, we fully acknowledge that no incident was reported regarding the missing referral form and as such the incident review process did not take place. We are taking steps to ensure staff are aware of the need to report an incident in these situations through awareness and reminders. We are also undertaking a full review of the incident process in the Health Board, in co-design with our staff, and will introduce a new process and procedure for April 2024. This new process will include a revised training programme for staff.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with Digital Health and Care Wales to develop an electronic ERCP internal referral form within the Welsh Clinical Portal.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In parallel with the operational work above, the Health Board are working with Digital Health and Care Wales (DHCW) on the development of an electronic form as part of the Welsh Clinical Portal (WCP) that clinicians can use to do an internal referral specifically and exclusively for ERCP. It is not clear when this national work will be delivered and we are chasing them on it.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 3 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit referral forms received between 1 October 2021 and 30 November 2023 for missing forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following this incident, I can however confirm there has been learning and we have made improvements. A new standing operating procedure for all endoscopy referrals has been implemented in November 2023 to ensure all paper referrals are scanned into the endoscopy email inbox, even if received in a paper format by the endoscopy booking clerks. An audit has been completed of referral forms dating 01 October 2021 to 30 November 2023 to ensure no other forms have been lost.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement a process for reviewing complaints, medical examiner reports, incidents and other matters, and sharing appropriate lessons.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We do however accept that we have improvements to be made to our own process, and the West Integrated Health Community have developed and implemented a process in November 2023 to ensure that any complaints, medical examiner reports, incidents and other matters are adequately reviewed to ensure we are able to provide patients and families the best response and outcome, and to ensure lessons learnt are appropriate and shared.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Triage medical examiner forms, send them to clinical services and upload them to Datix within two weeks, referring potential incident triggers to the Patient Safety Team.

Verbatim wording from the response

“At an organisational level, our Mortality Review Team have developed and introduced a process whereby medical examiner forms are triaged upon receipt and will be sent to our clinical services and uploaded to our Datix quality management system within 2 weeks, ensuring they are available for access by those undertaking investigations. Following this triage, the team will also send a copy to the Patient Safety Team if anything is identified which may need to trigger the incident process. This provides a further safety net and was introduced over the summer of 2023 as a result of your earlier concerns.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop a strategic outline business case for an Electronic Patient Record system with Welsh Government and Digital Health and Care Wales.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to electronic records, we are currently developing a strategic outline business case for an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system in conjunction with Welsh Government and Digital Health and Care Wales (DHCW). This business case will require significant investment and the Health Board hope to present it to Welsh Government in early 2024 and would expect significant time taken to secure approval. Once funds are secured, the timelines for delivering such a significant transformation project, as is required in the case of the Health Board, will be at least three years. This is based on an independent assessment made of our business need in terms of people, practice and technology by Ethical Healthcare Consulting who have been assisting us with this business case.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Health Board did not receive medical examiner concerns before the inquest because no scrutiny document had been created at the time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to a lack of action on concerns from the medical examiner, whilst I acknowledge your own concerns, the Health Board only received the report from the medical examiner on the day of the inquest as a result of your inquiries (and I understand you are aware of this issue at the inquest). The Senior Medical Examiner Officer for North”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Electronic patient record implementation depends on substantial investment and approval, with delivery taking at least three years after funding is secured.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In relation to electronic records, we are currently developing a strategic outline business case for an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system in conjunction with Welsh Government and Digital Health and Care Wales (DHCW). This business case will require significant investment and the Health Board hope to present it to Welsh Government in early 2024 and would expect significant time taken to secure approval. Once funds are secured, the timelines for delivering such a significant transformation project, as is required in the case of the Health Board, will be at least three years. This is based on an independent assessment made of our business need in terms of people, practice and technology by Ethical Healthcare Consulting who have been assisting us with this business case.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The independent medical examiner service is provided nationally by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership, to which the issue was reported.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Wales has confirmed no scrutiny document was created at the time of the death by them, and therefore the Health Board was not in receipt of the concerns they had. The medical examiner service is independent to the Health Board and provided nationally by NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership. We have reported this issue to them.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 2 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Raise staff awareness and issue reminders about reporting incidents involving missing referral forms.

    Stated by Betsi Cadwaladr University LHBStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 1 November 2023.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise staff awareness and issue reminders about reporting incidents involving missing referral forms.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Turning to the first concern, we fully acknowledge that no incident was reported regarding the missing referral form and as such the incident review process did not take place. We are taking steps to ensure staff are aware of the need to report an incident in these situations through awareness and reminders. We are also undertaking a full review of the incident process in the Health Board, in co-design with our staff, and will introduce a new process and procedure for April 2024. This new process will include a revised training programme for staff.”

Source location

Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Page 1 · response
Published 1 November 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026