PFD report

Simon Paul Barber · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Jan 2019•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Inadequate risk assessments
  2. Failure to ensure staff awareness of reporting all incidents endangering service users
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable reporting of patient-safety incidents
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate risk assessments

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was given before the Court that the risk assessment carried out First Class Care was inadequate. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless adequate risk assessments are carried out by First Class Care and staff are made aware of the importance of reporting all incidents that endanger the safety of service users ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure staff awareness of reporting all incidents endangering service users

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was given before the Court that the risk assessment carried out First Class Care was inadequate. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless adequate risk assessments are carried out by First Class Care and staff are made aware of the importance of reporting all incidents that endanger the safety of service users ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable reporting of patient-safety incidents.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Communicate the review’s recommendations and relevant implemented changes to the Adult Safeguarding Board for sharing with social and private landlords.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2019.
  2. 2

    Update the Occupational Therapy Service’s Ramping policy to require consideration of two access points where single access creates significant risk or fire risk is insufficiently mitigated.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 26 May 2019.
  3. 3

    Complete risk assessments for all citizens moving into suitable accommodation through the Disabled Housing Advisor service, coordinated by Disabled Housing Advisors.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2019.
  4. 4

    Begin implementing recommendations approved by the Housing Strategy Board and Director for Adult Social Services.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2019.
  5. 5

    Complete an end-to-end review of Adaptations and Occupational Therapy Services, including resources, capacity, effective practice and Disabled Housing Advisor sufficiency.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 26 May 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.2

  1. 1

    Private and other landlords are not required to complete recommended adaptations or permit the Council to make them.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. 2

    Property layouts may prevent adaptations, making alternative accommodation the usual recommendation.

    Stated by Nottingham City CouncilUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate the review’s recommendations and relevant implemented changes to the Adult Safeguarding Board for sharing with social and private landlords.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This review will focus on risk assessments completed for residents moving into Nottingham City Homes’ properties; however recommendations of the review as well as relevant information regarding changes implemented following its completion will be communicated effectively to the Adult Safeguarding Board in order that these can be shared with other social and private landlords. This action is key since Occupational Therapists will continue to assess the needs of and associated risks faced by disabled citizens living in privately rented housing in addition to social housing provided by other landlords and recommend suitable adaptations; however landlords are not obligated to complete recommended adaptations nor to permit Nottingham City Council to make these on their behalf.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Occupational Therapy Service’s Ramping policy to require consideration of two access points where single access creates significant risk or fire risk is insufficiently mitigated.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to address this concern, Nottingham City Council’s Occupational Therapy Service’s Ramping policy has already been reviewed in order to reflect explicitly that, if there are significant risks to the resident associated with just one ramped access, that this would necessarily require consideration of two ramped points of access as would any indication of an increased fire risk which has not been mitigated sufficiently with the implementation of the recommendations of Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service. It is important to highlight that it is not always possible to make adaptations to certain properties due to the building layout, and in these circumstances it would usually be recommended that alternative properties would be more suitable for that specific citizen.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete risk assessments for all citizens moving into suitable accommodation through the Disabled Housing Advisor service, coordinated by Disabled Housing Advisors.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A commitment has already been made by Nottingham City Homes and Nottingham City Council’s Occupational Therapy and Adaptations services to the completion of risk assessments for all citizens moving into suitable accommodation via the Disabled Housing Advisor service. It has been agreed that the Disabled Housing Advisors would be best placed to co-ordinate the completion of these risk assessments, since they are familiar with the layout of properties and are in receipt of pertinent information relating to each citizen.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Begin implementing recommendations approved by the Housing Strategy Board and Director for Adult Social Services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The review will be completed by the beginning of October 2019. Implementation of all recommendations approved by the Housing Strategy Board and by Catherine Underwood, DASS, will commence in December 2019.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete an end-to-end review of Adaptations and Occupational Therapy Services, including resources, capacity, effective practice and Disabled Housing Advisor sufficiency.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Currently, there are two Advisors to deliver the service to all the citizens who may need this each year and, therefore, an end to end review of Nottingham City Council’s Adaptations and Occupational Therapy Services will be completed concentrating on the citizen journey through the whole system and will also consider resources, capacity and effective practice. This review will necessarily also address the sufficiency of resources in The Disabled Housing Advisor and the Occupational Therapy Services and make suitable recommendations regarding the maximisation of service capacity in order to meet demand.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Private and other landlords are not required to complete recommended adaptations or permit the Council to make them.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This review will focus on risk assessments completed for residents moving into Nottingham City Homes’ properties; however recommendations of the review as well as relevant information regarding changes implemented following its completion will be communicated effectively to the Adult Safeguarding Board in order that these can be shared with other social and private landlords. This action is key since Occupational Therapists will continue to assess the needs of and associated risks faced by disabled citizens living in privately rented housing in addition to social housing provided by other landlords and recommend suitable adaptations; however landlords are not obligated to complete recommended adaptations nor to permit Nottingham City Council to make these on their behalf.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 2 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Property layouts may prevent adaptations, making alternative accommodation the usual recommendation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In order to address this concern, Nottingham City Council’s Occupational Therapy Service’s Ramping policy has already been reviewed in order to reflect explicitly that, if there are significant risks to the resident associated with just one ramped access, that this would necessarily require consideration of two ramped points of access as would any indication of an increased fire risk which has not been mitigated sufficiently with the implementation of the recommendations of Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service. It is important to highlight that it is not always possible to make adaptations to certain properties due to the building layout, and in these circumstances it would usually be recommended that alternative properties would be more suitable for that specific citizen.”

Source location

2019-0407-Response-by-Nottingham-City-Council
Page 1 · response
Published 26 May 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026