Richard Ellis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Sep 2025•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of legal requirements for servicing and maintenance of agricultural tractors outside road traffic requirements
    Part of recurring concern: Unsafe agricultural tractor and trailer safety arrangements

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. Department for Transport

    Continue monitoring the effectiveness of vehicle safety regulations to identify potential amendments.

  2. Department for Transport

    Investigate how to raise awareness of existing roadworthiness guidance, consider additional agricultural vehicle maintenance guidance, and assess communication to operators including private-land users.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Department for Transport

    Annual roadworthiness testing for slower agricultural tractors was considered disproportionate because their road use is limited.

    No action considered necessaryThe respondent said that no further action was needed.
  2. Department for Transport

    For private-land incidents covered by health and safety legislation, enforcement responsibility rests with the Health and Safety Executive.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of legal requirements for servicing and maintenance of agricultural tractors outside road traffic requirements

Wider context from the report

“The evidence was that there are no legal requirements for the servicing and maintenance of agricultural tractors which do not fall within the requirements of the Road Traffic Act 1988 and the associated regulations. As such, the maintenance of these vehicles is dependent on the discretion of the vehicle owners. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe agricultural tractor and trailer safety arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring the effectiveness of vehicle safety regulations to identify potential amendments.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Department will continue to monitor the effectiveness of vehicle safety regulations to identify any potential amendments.”

Source location

Response from Department of Transport
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Investigate how to raise awareness of existing roadworthiness guidance, consider additional agricultural vehicle maintenance guidance, and assess communication to operators including private-land users.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In view of your report, I have asked my officials to investigate how best to raise awareness of the DVSA’s published guidance on maintaining roadworthiness and to consider whether additional specific guidance on agricultural vehicle maintenance should be published. My officials will consider how best this information can be communicated to operators of agricultural vehicles, including those who operate tractors solely on private land.”

Source location

Response from Department of Transport
Page 4 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Annual roadworthiness testing for slower agricultural tractors was considered disproportionate because their road use is limited.

Verbatim wording from the response

“My Department conducted a consultation in 2016 on introducing roadworthiness testing for fast tractors used for commercial haulage. As a result, agricultural tractors capable of a speed over 40km/h (approximately 25mph) being used for commercial haulage were brought into scope of roadworthiness testing under the Goods Vehicles (Plating and Testing) Regulations 1988. At the time, it was decided that it would not be proportionate to bring slower speed agricultural tractors in scope of annual roadworthiness testing given their use on roads is limited in comparison with other vehicles.”

Source location

Response from Department of Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

For private-land incidents covered by health and safety legislation, enforcement responsibility rests with the Health and Safety Executive.

Verbatim wording from the response

“If the incident took place on a private land, there is health and safety legislation (Health and Safety at Work Act 1974) that covers the maintenance and servicing of agricultural vehicles. This legislation is enforced by the Health & Safety Executive and an employer is required to ensure, so far is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of both their employees and non-employees who may be affected by their undertaking. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (“PUWER”) provide a set of more specific duties in relation to work equipment, including that employers ensure their work equipment is maintained in an efficient state, in efficient working order and in good repair. This is also maintained by the HSE and we suggest that you consider writing to them should the circumstances of this case fall under this legislation.”

Source location

Response from Department of Transport
Page 3 · response
Published 29 September 2025

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026