PFD report

Lucy-Anne DYSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Sep 2025•Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a national interface for safeguarding reporting and communication between schools and relevant agencies
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information
  2. Lack of national guidance and standards for safeguarding referrals
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable child safeguarding referral processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Run local pilots testing the consistent child identifier with existing safeguarding systems and databases to inform national interoperability standards.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  2. Action

    Develop national data standards with education, local authority and technology partners for secure connections between school safeguarding systems and partner agencies.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  3. Action

    Update and publish Keeping Children Safe in Education guidance to support consistent recognition, referral and response to safeguarding concerns.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 January 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a national interface for safeguarding reporting and communication between schools and relevant agencies

Wider context from the report

“1. The lack of a national interface to enable reporting/communication between schools using safeguarding record keeping systems (e.g. CPOMS) and relevant agencies, including Police and Children’s Services. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable interagency sharing of safeguarding risk information.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of national guidance and standards for safeguarding referrals

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of national guidance/standards means agencies with safeguarding duties for children are receiving referrals that either rely too heavily on the individual referrer’s judgement about what should be included, or where no referral is made at all. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable child safeguarding referral processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run local pilots testing the consistent child identifier with existing safeguarding systems and databases to inform national interoperability standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Pilots and Implementation Planning The Department has initiated a series of local pilots to test the implementation of the consistent child identifier and its interoperability with existing safeguarding systems (such as CPOMS) and local authority databases. Learning from these pilots will inform national standards for interoperability between systems.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop national data standards with education, local authority and technology partners for secure connections between school safeguarding systems and partner agencies.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• System and Process Reform Alongside legislative changes, the Department is convening education, local authority, and technology partners to develop national data standards to enable secure, accurate connections between school safeguarding systems and partner agencies.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and publish Keeping Children Safe in Education guidance to support consistent recognition, referral and response to safeguarding concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) (2024) Schools and colleges have a critical role to play in protecting children and keeping them safe. The Department publishes the statutory safeguarding guidance Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) to support schools and colleges in carrying out their duties to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. KCSIE makes clear that every school must have a Designated Safeguarding Lead who takes lead responsibility for safeguarding and child protection. Part 1 of the guidance, which should be read by all staff who work directly with children, sets out that all staff should know what to do if they have concerns about a child and should be aware of the process for making referrals to local authority children’s social care and for statutory assessments under the Children Act 1989.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a consistent child identifier through the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to enable secure cross-agency record matching.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Single unique identifier The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, introduced in Parliament on 17th December will protect children at risk of abuse, stopping vulnerable children falling through cracks in services, and deliver a core guarantee of high standards with space for innovation in every child’s education.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver Families First Partnership reforms, including multi-agency child protection teams and integrated front-door models for triaging contacts and referrals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Families First Partnership Programme Through this programme, we are delivering national reforms to Family Help, multi-agency child protection, and Family Group Decision Making. The reforms include establishing multi-agency child protection teams that bring together education, police, health, and social care professionals to take decisive action where significant harm is identified. The programme also promotes integrated ‘front door’ models for triaging contacts and referrals, ensuring concerns are directed appropriately and consistently.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. 1

    Update Working Together guidance and introduce national multi-agency child protection standards clarifying safeguarding roles, information sharing and risk-response expectations.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  2. 2

    Establish a statutory information-sharing duty for organisations involved in safeguarding children through the Bill.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  3. 3

    Monitor implementation of the safeguarding measures and engage safeguarding partners so lessons learned produce lasting practice improvements.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  4. 4

    Prepare statutory guidance with the Home Office for implementing the Operation Encompass notification duty.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  5. 5

    Issue further statutory guidance, co-produced with the sector, on applying the new information-sharing duty and consistent identifier.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  6. 6

    Review Working Together annually to ensure it reflects the best available evidence.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 January 2026.
  7. 7

    Invest in professional training and embed domestic abuse awareness across social work, education and health safeguarding education and standards.

    Stated by Department for EducationStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 19 January 2026.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    The report inaccurately described the abusive relationship and cause of death, failing to reflect that her estranged husband violently murdered her.

    Stated by Department for EducationDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update Working Together guidance and introduce national multi-agency child protection standards clarifying safeguarding roles, information sharing and risk-response expectations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023) We updated this guidance in 2023, with a sharp focus on strengthening multi-agency working across the whole system of help, support and protection. Importantly, we introduced new national multi-agency child protection standards setting out what every individual, at every level, in every agency should do to work together and understand their role, to improve child protection practice and outcomes for children. We also strengthened expectations about the role of other agencies, including police and health, in child protection processes. This guidance sets clear expectations for all safeguarding partners to share information early and work collaboratively in assessing and responding to risk. It”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish a statutory information-sharing duty for organisations involved in safeguarding children through the Bill.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• New Information Sharing Duty The Bill will also establish a new legal obligation on relevant organisations (including education, health, police, and social care) to share information for the purpose of safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children. This will ensure all key agencies have a shared legal foundation for timely and appropriate information exchange.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor implementation of the safeguarding measures and engage safeguarding partners so lessons learned produce lasting practice improvements.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We will continue to monitor implementation of these measures and engage closely with safeguarding partners to ensure that lessons learned lead to lasting improvements in practice and outcomes.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Prepare statutory guidance with the Home Office for implementing the Operation Encompass notification duty.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Operation Encompass The Department has worked closely with the Home Office to prepare statutory guidance for the implementation of the Operation Encompass duty. This will require police forces to notify educational settings of domestic abuse incidents”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue further statutory guidance, co-produced with the sector, on applying the new information-sharing duty and consistent identifier.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Statutory Guidance and Sector Engagement The updated Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023) guidance emphasises the importance of proactive information sharing to assess and respond to concerns about a child’s safety. Further statutory guidance will be issued, co-produced with the sector, to support practitioners in applying the new Information Sharing Duty and consistent identifier in practice.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 2 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review Working Together annually to ensure it reflects the best available evidence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“clarifies that local authorities must consider a wide range of evidence from across agencies when making decisions under section 47 of the Children Act 1989. In 2023 we committed to reviewing Working Together every year to ensure it reflects best evidence.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 4 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Invest in professional training and embed domestic abuse awareness across social work, education and health safeguarding education and standards.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Improving Professional Practice and Training The Department, alongside Social Work England, is investing in training for child and family social workers to strengthen identification and response to violence, abuse, and coercive control. Domestic abuse awareness is being embedded in social work education and training standards, as well as across education and health sectors. This includes updating safeguarding training and reinforcing expectations within statutory guidance and school safeguarding policies.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 3 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The report inaccurately described the abusive relationship and cause of death, failing to reflect that her estranged husband violently murdered her.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is extremely disappointing to see your language in section 4 of your report (the narrative conclusion) describing, euphemistically, a “dysfunctional and toxic” relationship in which “the nature of the relationship between both parties was abusive”, which was “a material contribution to [her] death”; furthermore you describe the cause of death as being “multiple blunt force injuries”, as if these injuries fell from the sky or were of unknown origin, the manner of her death was a sickeningly violent murder by her estranged husband, as the sentencing remarks by Judge Akhlaq Choudhury KC made very clear. I have raised my concerns on this point with the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Victims and Tackling Violence Against Women and Girls.”

Source location

Response from Department for Education
Page 1 · response
Published 19 January 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026