PFD report

Walter FAULDER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Jan 2024•Cumbria

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Risk of further accidents at a busy pedestrian crossing
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Responsibility for the A595 at the identified location rests with Cumberland Council, which should respond to the report.

    Stated by Monmouthshire County CouncilRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Risk of further accidents at a busy pedestrian crossing

Wider context from the report

“(1) Walter seems to have believed that as a pedestrian he had right of way, he may have been a bit confused having forgotten his wallet however the day before the collision be referred to the illuminated pole in the central refuge as a Belisha Beacon. (2) I heard that this is a busy crossing point, schoolchildren cross morning and evening for busses too and from school. There are also an increasing number of older people living in nearby developments. (3) I am concerned that without safety alterations further accidents and possible fatalities may occur. Is there a case for lights to be installed? ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of pedestrian crossing risks.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for the A595 at the identified location rests with Cumberland Council, which should respond to the report.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am writing to inform you that National Highways is not the highway authority for the A595 at Orton Grange and is therefore not the appropriate authority to respond to the Regulation 28 report. The highway authority for the A595 at the location identified is the responsibility of Cumberland Council.”

Source location

Response from National Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 11 January 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The matter falls outside National Highways’ authority because it is not the highway authority for the A595 at Orton Grange.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am writing to inform you that National Highways is not the highway authority for the A595 at Orton Grange and is therefore not the appropriate authority to respond to the Regulation 28 report. The highway authority for the A595 at the location identified is the responsibility of Cumberland Council.”

Source location

Response from National Highways
Page 1 · response
Published 11 January 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026