PFD report

Archi Johnson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 26 Jul 2022•Exeter and Greater Devon

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of a system ensuring important information is present on both types of risk assessment
  2. Failure to clearly record and make relevant previous incidents known to those responsible for care
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable documentation of safety risk assessmentsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable recording of safety-critical mental health information
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a system ensuring important information is present on both types of risk assessment

Wider context from the report

“1.Evidence was heard regarding the manner in which information crucial to the formulation of risk assessments was recorded and shared: a)Two types of risk assessments were completed, with no system to ensure that important information is present on both; b) The previous incident in which Archi had attempted to take his own life in very similar circumstances on the ward was not clearly entered on the risk assessments used by staff and therefore not known to a number of those responsible for his care; c) Those responsible for his care accepted that the above incident was one of which they would have wanted to have knowledge; d) The absence of that information may have affected the subsequent decisions made regarding the setting of risk level, observation level and removal of potentially dangerous ligature items. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to clearly record and make relevant previous incidents known to those responsible for care

Wider context from the report

“1.Evidence was heard regarding the manner in which information crucial to the formulation of risk assessments was recorded and shared: a)Two types of risk assessments were completed, with no system to ensure that important information is present on both; b) The previous incident in which Archi had attempted to take his own life in very similar circumstances on the ward was not clearly entered on the risk assessments used by staff and therefore not known to a number of those responsible for his care; c) Those responsible for his care accepted that the above incident was one of which they would have wanted to have knowledge; d) The absence of that information may have affected the subsequent decisions made regarding the setting of risk level, observation level and removal of potentially dangerous ligature items. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable documentation of safety risk assessments; Unreliable recording of safety-critical mental health information.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. 1

    Work with the software provider to resolve access problems affecting the usual electronic patient record systems.

    Stated by Devon Partnership NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 29 September 2022.
  2. 2

    Maintain current clinical records using a secure alternative while usual electronic patient record systems remain inaccessible.

    Stated by Devon Partnership NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 September 2022.
  3. 3

    Complete the action plan developed from the Serious Incident Investigation and RCA investigation.

    Stated by Devon Partnership NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 September 2022.
  4. 4

    Share the coroner’s findings with the involved service and across the wider Trust.

    Stated by Devon Partnership NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 29 September 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Access issues with electronic patient records may delay completion of clinical audit actions because full clinical records are unavailable.

    Stated by Devon Partnership NHS TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with the software provider to resolve access problems affecting the usual electronic patient record systems.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you may be aware, the Trust is currently experiencing issues accessing our usual electronic patient record systems and as a result there may be some delays in completing the actions relating to the clinical audit as this will depend on our being able to access the full clinical records. We continue to support people who use our services and the Trust is able to maintain current records using a secure alternative. We are working closely with the software provider to resolve these technical issues and apologise for any delay that may result.”

Source location

Response from Devon Partnership Trust Care
Page 2 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain current clinical records using a secure alternative while usual electronic patient record systems remain inaccessible.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you may be aware, the Trust is currently experiencing issues accessing our usual electronic patient record systems and as a result there may be some delays in completing the actions relating to the clinical audit as this will depend on our being able to access the full clinical records. We continue to support people who use our services and the Trust is able to maintain current records using a secure alternative. We are working closely with the software provider to resolve these technical issues and apologise for any delay that may result.”

Source location

Response from Devon Partnership Trust Care
Page 2 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the action plan developed from the Serious Incident Investigation and RCA investigation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has undertaken a Serious Incident Investigation following the death of Archi; the report was shared at the inquest and I can confirm that the action plan developed in response to the RCA investigation has been completed.”

Source location

Response from Devon Partnership Trust Care
Page 1 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Share the coroner’s findings with the involved service and across the wider Trust.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Thank you for your letter following the inquest into the death of Archi Johnson. As an organisation we are committed to learning from these tragic events and have since receiving your report and recommendations taken the opportunity to share your findings with the service involved as well as across the wider trust.”

Source location

Response from Devon Partnership Trust Care
Page 1 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Access issues with electronic patient records may delay completion of clinical audit actions because full clinical records are unavailable.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you may be aware, the Trust is currently experiencing issues accessing our usual electronic patient record systems and as a result there may be some delays in completing the actions relating to the clinical audit as this will depend on our being able to access the full clinical records. We continue to support people who use our services and the Trust is able to maintain current records using a secure alternative. We are working closely with the software provider to resolve these technical issues and apologise for any delay that may result.”

Source location

Response from Devon Partnership Trust Care
Page 2 · response
Published 29 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026