This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.
On 04/07/2017 I commenced an investigation into the death of Edir Frederico Araujo DA COSTA. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 6 June 2019, which was heard with a jury. The conclusion of the jury following the inquest was:
Misadventure – Mr Da Costa died from the consequences of cardiorespiratory arrest suffered when his airway became obstructed by a plastic bag containing drugs, which he had placed in his mouth.
Circumstances of the death
The jury reached the following findings of fact:
• The vehicle Mr Da Costa was travelling in was stopped by police officers at approx. 21:59 on the 15th June 2017. Mr Da Costa exited the car and had interaction with the police officers • Either before or after exiting the car Mr Da Costa placed a plastic bag containing around 88 wraps of Class A drugs into his mouth • Mr Da Costa was taken to the ground by officers in an attempt to restrain him. • 4 officers were involved in the restraint • CS spray was used to gain control of Mr Da Costa in order to place his hands in handcuffs • Mr Da Costa’s hands were placed in handcuffs while he was in the prone position • 20-30 wraps of Class A drugs were observed on the ground near Mr Da Costa’s mouth • The above actions occurred from approx. 21:59 – 22:04 • Mr Da Costa became unresponsive due to the obstruction of his airway by the plastic bag • Mr Da Costa’s handcuffs were removed and he was placed in the recovery position • The first aid primary survey was commenced by an officer • While the primary survey was taking place ARV officers arrived at approx. 22:05 • A call was placed for an ambulance by an officer at approx. 22:05 • ARV officers took over first aid and CPR was started at approx. 22:09 • The ambulance call was initially categorised as a C3 (lower priority & 30 minute response) as Mr Da Costa was reported as being “conscious and breathing” • The MPS controller provided an incorrect address and incorrect map reference to the LAS. This caused a delay of a few minutes in the LAS being provided with the correct address however this delay did not contribute to the outcome • The first LAS vehicle was dispatched at approx. 22:13 and arrived at approx. 22:18 • The LAS clinical team leader removed a plastic bag containing some wraps at approx. 22:37. More effective ventilation was provided after this time • The ambulance arrived at Newham University Hospital at approx. 22:44 • Spontaneous circulation returned at approx. 22:47 • The initial CT scan in the emergency department showed signs of severe hypoxic brain injury • Mr Da Costa remained care in Newham University Hospital until 21st June 2017. During this time in the ITU Mr Da Costa was on life support when following a brain stem examination life support was removed and he passed away • The post-mortem examinations confirmed that cause of death was hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, as a result of cardio-respiratory arrest and caused by a foreign body airway obstruction. No other significant traumatic injuries were found
Coroner’s concerns
(1) The evidence at the Inquest revealed that not all police officers are up to date with mandatory Emergency Life Support training. In addition, the current system in place makes it difficult for supervisors to check whether members of their team have received mandatory training. I request that the working group, driven by Met training, review the attendance of officers at mandatory ELS training and review the systems in place for supervisors to monitor attendance. I request that in doing so they consider the concerns raised by Inspector BC in his evidence at the Inquest. (2) The evidence at the Inquest did not provide assurance that a safety officer had taken control of the restraint or that one officer was taking the lead in communicating with Mr Da Costa and/or monitoring his condition. In addition, the officers who gave evidence considered that the role of the safety officer mainly applied to restraint in a controlled custody setting. The MPS are requested to review the training provided to staff in relation to the role of the safety officer in a street setting and to consider whether a reminder of the importance of the safety officer role, in the street setting, should be issued to staff (by way of bulletin or otherwise). (3) The Inquest heard that it is well documented that members of the public may swallow plastic bags to evade arrest or conceal evidence. Placing plastic bags in the mouth raises a very high risk of choking. Police officers should be aware of these risks. The MPS are requested to review the training provided to police officers to ensure they are fully informed about the specific risks around the use of plastic bags and the associated risk of choking. (4) The evidence given at the Inquest hearing revealed a concern that the use of CS spray, when a person has something in their mouth, could increase the risk of a complete airway obstruction. The MPS is requested to review the guidance and procedures in place for officers, in relation to the use of CS spray where a person is believed to be holding items in their mouth. (5) The evidence at the Inquest revealed that agonal breaths were likely to have been missed. The officer provided the description of the breaths as looking like “yawning.” The independent expert stated that these were, beyond reasonable doubt, agonal breaths. The MPS is requested to review the training to officers around the recognition of agonal breaths. Within the training, the MPS may wish to incorporate the helpful descriptions provided by the officer in this case. (6) Evidence was heard at the Inquest that errors were made in communicating information to the LAS. This was in part due to the noise levels within the communication’s command centre for the London Borough of Newham. The MPS is requested to carry out an immediate review into the noise levels within the communication command centre and to take steps to reduce noise levels as far as possible. The longer term plans that the MPS have put in place to review their communications command centre is very much welcomed but it is considered that interim, proportionate measures should be explored. (7) The controller who was communicating with the LAS received information that Mr Da Costa had stopped breathing. She did not use the correct procedure to update the LAS in relation to this life threatening deterioration. The MPS are requested to review the operation of the procedure for updating CADs and to take any necessary action to ensure that staff are fully aware of the correct procedure to be adopted.
Concerns and recipient responses
Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
Report evidence summary
Concerns raised10
Failure to follow the procedure for updating CADs about life-threatening deterioration
Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.18
Action
Phase in double-ear headsets for First Contact and Despatch staff, prioritising occupational-health and line-management referrals.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Introduce agonal-breathing video clips into Emergency Life Support training.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Progress an external-system change to produce and circulate monthly training-compliance reports to senior managers.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Review and consult on National Personal Safety Manual medical-implications guidance concerning irritant spray and airway risk before publication.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Relocate dispatch-floor printers and install sound-reducing screening around them.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Add tactical-option assessment, justification, and recording guidance for suspected swallowed drugs to refresher training.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Remind duty officers to manage non-operational discussions on operational floors.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Drive strategic work to reduce officers overdue for mandatory Emergency Life Support and Officer Safety Training.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Reintroduce paper training cards recording officers’ latest approved Officer Safety or Emergency Life Support training attendance.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Issue local training data packs enabling commanders to identify officers requiring up-to-date training.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Explore incorporating Officer Safety and Emergency Life Support training into team rosters as rostered duty.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Include significant-deterioration CAD procedures in initial call-handler training and October personal-development training days.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Review communications-centre noise levels and identify sources requiring mitigation.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Circulate a bulletin reminding staff to create a new CAD for significant patient deterioration and update the LAS.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Replace MetCC doors with silent or near-silent opening and closing doors.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Add safety-officer role reminders and incident evidence requirements to the Officer Safety Training refresher package.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Recommend implementing the identified noise-mitigation measures across all MetCC sites.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Action
Withhold newly issued personal protective equipment from officers until their mandatory training is current.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3
Position
Sound testing identified no current noise issues in the communications centre, although further mitigation measures were nevertheless implemented.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
Position
Evidence that CS spray worsens airway obstruction was theoretical and unsupported by firm evidence; further medical research was therefore being pursued.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
Position
Current safety officer training already covers both custody and street settings, although refresher training will reinforce the role in street incidents.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
Other statements in published responses
These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.
Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4
1
Publish and deliver communications informing officers and commanders about mandatory training compliance requirements.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
2
Deliver a future restraint lesson on prone resistance incorporating National Personal Safety Manual mouth-management guidance and medical-emergency reminders.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
3
Seek authority to commission a survey establishing evidence about officers’ reactions after CS-spray exposure.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.
4
Highlight revised mouth-management guidance in Officer Safety Training.
Stated byMetropolitan Police ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 23 August 2019.