Dr Alan William Kingsbury · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 8 Jul 2024•West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
6

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
7

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised6

  1. Failure of the service to provide accessible advice on discontinuing anticoagulants
  2. Insufficiently robust guidance on maintaining anti-thrombotic medication before dermatological excision
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk
  3. Failure to obtain advanced consent before dermatological surgery
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Implement documented preoperative assessments to identify risks of complications from skin surgery.

  2. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Provide advanced consent and schedule procedures to allow appropriate adjustment of anticoagulation.

  3. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Integrate any amended British Society of Dermatological Surgery guidance on anticoagulants into service policy.

  4. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Communicate the response's safety measures to clinical staff.

  5. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Close surgical excision wounds with deep self-dissolving subcutaneous sutures and cutaneous sutures.

  6. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Monitor postoperative infections, bleeding and wound dehiscence through ongoing clinical governance using RADAR software.

  7. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Highlight to clinicians the importance of adequate deep wound closure for patients at higher risk of postoperative bleeding or wound dehiscence.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Sussex Community Dermatology Service

    Responsibility for responding to the concern about BSDS guidance rests with BSDS; SCDS will await any revised guidance.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  2. British Society For Dermatological Surgery

    The guidelines are not intended for community surgery, where other guidance may be more appropriate and hospital facilities and expertise differ.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
  3. British Society For Dermatological Surgery

    The existing antithrombotic and skin-surgery guidelines are considered sufficiently robust as drafted, based on clinical expertise and published evidence.

    Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  4. British Society For Dermatological Surgery

    There is no known dermatological surgery evidence that the condition of excised skin affects bleeding risk or should be included in the guideline.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the service to provide accessible advice on discontinuing anticoagulants

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of a Preoperative assessment and advanced consent Dr Kingsbury was not assessed or consented either in person or by telephone consultation prior to the day of the procedure against current accepted guidelines for surgical procedures. No risk/benefit analysis was undertaken as to the suitability of undertaking the procedure whilst Dr Kingsbury was taking Aspirin and Clopidogrel. Mrs Kingsbury made multiple attempts at communicating with the service without success to obtain advice as to the necessity or otherwise of discontinuing the anticoagulants. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficiently robust guidance on maintaining anti-thrombotic medication before dermatological excision

Wider context from the report

“1. BSDS (British Society of Dermatological Surgery) Guidelines on Anti-thrombotics and skin surgery for dermatological excisions in the community. The guidelines as to the suitability of maintaining patients’ anti-thrombotic medication prior to surgical excision are insufficiently robust to reflect bleeding potential from a myriad of factors including the condition of the skin being excised, the position of the lesion and the underlying frailty and medical co-morbidites of individual requiring dermatological surgery in the community. Dr Kingsbury was extremely frail taking Aspirin and Clopidogrel. The lesion to be excised was on the upper chest wall with extremely fragile skin and the excision was larger than expected with some difficulty in obtaining primary closure. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to obtain advanced consent before dermatological surgery

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of a Preoperative assessment and advanced consent Dr Kingsbury was not assessed or consented either in person or by telephone consultation prior to the day of the procedure against current accepted guidelines for surgical procedures. No risk/benefit analysis was undertaken as to the suitability of undertaking the procedure whilst Dr Kingsbury was taking Aspirin and Clopidogrel. Mrs Kingsbury made multiple attempts at communicating with the service without success to obtain advice as to the necessity or otherwise of discontinuing the anticoagulants. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate informed-consent processes for medical treatment.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to conduct preoperative assessment before dermatological surgery

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of a Preoperative assessment and advanced consent Dr Kingsbury was not assessed or consented either in person or by telephone consultation prior to the day of the procedure against current accepted guidelines for surgical procedures. No risk/benefit analysis was undertaken as to the suitability of undertaking the procedure whilst Dr Kingsbury was taking Aspirin and Clopidogrel. Mrs Kingsbury made multiple attempts at communicating with the service without success to obtain advice as to the necessity or otherwise of discontinuing the anticoagulants. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to undertake risk-benefit analysis for surgery during anti-thrombotic treatment

Wider context from the report

“2. The lack of a Preoperative assessment and advanced consent Dr Kingsbury was not assessed or consented either in person or by telephone consultation prior to the day of the procedure against current accepted guidelines for surgical procedures. No risk/benefit analysis was undertaken as to the suitability of undertaking the procedure whilst Dr Kingsbury was taking Aspirin and Clopidogrel. Mrs Kingsbury made multiple attempts at communicating with the service without success to obtain advice as to the necessity or otherwise of discontinuing the anticoagulants. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate preoperative assessment of surgical suitability and risk.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient guidance on wound-closure technique to achieve haemostasis

Wider context from the report

“3. Guidance as to the appropriateness of the surgical technique for wound closure Evidence was heard that due to the fragility of the skin the initial wound closure was not sufficiently deep to effectively achieve haemostasis, requiring closure at a muscular level with different suture technique. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement documented preoperative assessments to identify risks of complications from skin surgery.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ Action to be taken: SCDS will ensure that its policies are sufficiently robust to be able to identify at risk patients at the time of 1st encounter and ensure that risk mitigation measures are in place. To achieve this, we will do the following: - Perform a thorough documented preoperative assessment to assess risk of complications associated with skin surgery. - Ensure advanced consent and scheduling of the procedure to allow adjustment of anticoagulation as appropriate.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide advanced consent and schedule procedures to allow appropriate adjustment of anticoagulation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ Action to be taken: SCDS will ensure that its policies are sufficiently robust to be able to identify at risk patients at the time of 1st encounter and ensure that risk mitigation measures are in place. To achieve this, we will do the following: - Perform a thorough documented preoperative assessment to assess risk of complications associated with skin surgery. - Ensure advanced consent and scheduling of the procedure to allow adjustment of anticoagulation as appropriate.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Integrate any amended British Society of Dermatological Surgery guidance on anticoagulants into service policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“- Follow up-to-date guidance regarding anticoagulants in skin surgery. - Always ensuring a favourable risk: benefit profile”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 2 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate the response's safety measures to clinical staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This response has been communicated to our clinical staff.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 2 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Close surgical excision wounds with deep self-dissolving subcutaneous sutures and cutaneous sutures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Our clinicians are all very experienced in skin surgery and we routinely monitor various aspects of their practice including postoperative infections, postoperative bleeding and wound dehiscence as part of our ongoing clinical governance using RADAR software. Our complication rates are very low and comparable to all our local NHS trust services. Surgical excision wounds are routinely closed with a deep layer of self-dissolving subcutaneous sutures and cutaneous sutures.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 2 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor postoperative infections, bleeding and wound dehiscence through ongoing clinical governance using RADAR software.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Our clinicians are all very experienced in skin surgery and we routinely monitor various aspects of their practice including postoperative infections, postoperative bleeding and wound dehiscence as part of our ongoing clinical governance using RADAR software. Our complication rates are very low and comparable to all our local NHS trust services. Surgical excision wounds are routinely closed with a deep layer of self-dissolving subcutaneous sutures and cutaneous sutures.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 2 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Highlight to clinicians the importance of adequate deep wound closure for patients at higher risk of postoperative bleeding or wound dehiscence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“▪ Action to be taken: We will use this case to highlight the importance of ensuring adequate deep closure of wounds especially when dealing with patients at higher risk of postoperative bleeding and wound dehiscence.”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 2 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Responsibility for responding to the concern about BSDS guidance rests with BSDS; SCDS will await any revised guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• This concern has been addressed directly to the BSDS so SCDS will not comment on this but await the response from the BSDS and any change to the current guidance”

Source location

Response from Surrey Community Dermatology Service
Page 1 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The guidelines are not intended for community surgery, where other guidance may be more appropriate and hospital facilities and expertise differ.

Verbatim wording from the response

“5.1 BSDS (British Society of [sic] Dermatological Surgery) Guidelines on Anti-thrombotics and skin surgery for dermatological excisions in the community.”

Source location

Response from British Society for Dermatological Surgery
Page 2 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The existing antithrombotic and skin-surgery guidelines are considered sufficiently robust as drafted, based on clinical expertise and published evidence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having carefully considered the Coroner’s concerns in the Regulation 28 report, it is the Society’s view that the guidelines referred to are sufficiently robust as currently drafted and based on clinical expertise and published evidence. We hope we have adequately responded to or addressed all your concerns raised in the Regulation 28 report. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to contribute to this investigation.”

Source location

Response from British Society for Dermatological Surgery
Page 7 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

There is no known dermatological surgery evidence that the condition of excised skin affects bleeding risk or should be included in the guideline.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The report into the prevention of future deaths states that the BSDS guidance is ‘insufficiently robust to reflect bleeding potential from a myriad of factors including the condition of the skin being excised, the position of the lesion and the underlying frailty and medical co-morbidities…’”

Source location

Response from British Society for Dermatological Surgery
Page 5 · response
Published 29 July 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026