PFD report

Mr Dokic · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Feb 2017•Inner West London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Potentially widespread dangerous areas of reduced-grip CSH road surface
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably control road-surface grip on Cycle Super Highways
  2. Failure to provide CSH road surfaces with increased grip for cyclists
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to reliably control road-surface grip on Cycle Super HighwaysPart of recurring concern: Inadequate controls for icy and slippery surfacesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable road-surface grip for vehicles
  3. Road areas at junctions as a particular risk hazard
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Potentially widespread dangerous areas of reduced-grip CSH road surface

Wider context from the report

“1. That the use of the road surface with reduced grip on the CSH compared to the usual road surface represents a hazard to road users making it more likely that they will lose control of their vehicles. 2. That the surface of the CSH with reduced grip may be widespread and as such other dangerous areas may exist. 3. That TfL should therefore undertake an urgent review of all areas treated with such road surface and replace it with the higher grip surface. 4. That the CSH should all have increased rather than reduced grip compared to the ordinary road surface since cyclists are vulnerable road users. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably control road-surface grip on Cycle Super Highways.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide CSH road surfaces with increased grip for cyclists

Wider context from the report

“1. That the use of the road surface with reduced grip on the CSH compared to the usual road surface represents a hazard to road users making it more likely that they will lose control of their vehicles. 2. That the surface of the CSH with reduced grip may be widespread and as such other dangerous areas may exist. 3. That TfL should therefore undertake an urgent review of all areas treated with such road surface and replace it with the higher grip surface. 4. That the CSH should all have increased rather than reduced grip compared to the ordinary road surface since cyclists are vulnerable road users. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to reliably control road-surface grip on Cycle Super Highways; Inadequate controls for icy and slippery surfaces; Unreliable road-surface grip for vehicles.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Road areas at junctions as a particular risk hazard

Wider context from the report

“5. That areas of road at junctions such as this junction between Battersea Park Road and Forrar Road are of particular concern from a risk perspective. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.