PFD report

Ronnie Olliffe · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 15 May 2016•Mid Kent and Medway

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of understanding of the consequences of issuing a Code Blue
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response
  2. Failure to consider or use an available defibrillator when appropriate
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitationPart of recurring concern: Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest
  3. Failure to issue a Code Blue when appropriate
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Issue emergency-response policy guidance and brief staff on responsibilities, code use, ambulance summoning, and defibrillator deployment.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 15 May 2016.
  2. Action

    Distribute pocket-sized cards explaining the emergency response codes to all staff.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 May 2016.
  3. Action

    Follow up with staff to ensure they know when and how to use defibrillators.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of understanding of the consequences of issuing a Code Blue

Wider context from the report

“1) there was a failure to issue a Code Blue pursuant to both a local and national policy in circumstances where it was appropriate to do so 2) there was a lack of understanding as to what consequences flowed from the issuing of a Code Blue, namely that an ambulance would be summoned immediately 3) there was a failure to consider or use a defibrillator when it was appropriate to do so and when one was available ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to consider or use an available defibrillator when appropriate

Wider context from the report

“1) there was a failure to issue a Code Blue pursuant to both a local and national policy in circumstances where it was appropriate to do so 2) there was a lack of understanding as to what consequences flowed from the issuing of a Code Blue, namely that an ambulance would be summoned immediately 3) there was a failure to consider or use a defibrillator when it was appropriate to do so and when one was available ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable defibrillator operation during resuscitation; Unreliable resuscitation preparedness and response during cardiac arrest.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to issue a Code Blue when appropriate

Wider context from the report

“1) there was a failure to issue a Code Blue pursuant to both a local and national policy in circumstances where it was appropriate to do so 2) there was a lack of understanding as to what consequences flowed from the issuing of a Code Blue, namely that an ambulance would be summoned immediately 3) there was a failure to consider or use a defibrillator when it was appropriate to do so and when one was available ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Issue emergency-response policy guidance and brief staff on responsibilities, code use, ambulance summoning, and defibrillator deployment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All night staff have been issued with a personal copy of Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 03/2013 Medical Emergency Response Codes and have each signed to say they understand the PSI and are fully aware of their responsibilities. A Notice to Staff setting out the policy has been issued and the remaining staff have been briefed at staff engagement sessions.”

Source location

2016-0224-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 15 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Distribute pocket-sized cards explaining the emergency response codes to all staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Notice to Staff described above also explains that when a code is used an ambulance will be called, and emphasises the importance of using the codes appropriately. Pocket-sized cards explaining the codes have been ordered and will be distributed to all staff.”

Source location

2016-0224-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 15 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Follow up with staff to ensure they know when and how to use defibrillators.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Notice to Staff described above also explains the process for the deployment of defibrillators and their location within the prison. A demonstration of the use of a defibrillator was provided during the July 2016 staff engagement session, and the Safer Custody team will follow this up so that all staff know when and how to use them.”

Source location

2016-0224-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 15 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide defibrillator-use demonstrations and guidance on defibrillator deployment and location.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Notice to Staff described above also explains the process for the deployment of defibrillators and their location within the prison. A demonstration of the use of a defibrillator was provided during the July 2016 staff engagement session, and the Safer Custody team will follow this up so that all staff know when and how to use them.”

Source location

2016-0224-Response-by-NOMS
Page 1 · response
Published 15 May 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Meet ambulance service colleagues to formalise a joint protocol for responding to emergencies within the prison.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 15 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Meet ambulance service colleagues to formalise a joint protocol for responding to emergencies within the prison.

Verbatim wording from the response

“You may also wish to be aware that relevant managers from HMP&YOI Rochester will be meeting colleagues from the South East Coastal Ambulance Service on 18 August to formalise a joint protocol for the response to emergencies within the prison.”

Source location

2016-0224-Response-by-NOMS
Page 2 · response
Published 15 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026