PFD report

Mrs Rita Flynn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 3 Aug 2022•Black Country

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to await blood test results before discharge
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted uponPart of recurring concern: Unreliable hospital discharge processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Incorporate proactive blood-result review into postgraduate induction training and disseminate the requirement to postgraduate staff.

    Stated by the Royal Wolverhampton NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Allocate consultant work-plan time to review blood results in the ICE system within 24 hours.

    Stated by the Royal Wolverhampton NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 10 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Use the ED clerking form’s investigations-and-results section to document blood-result review before discharge.

    Stated by the Royal Wolverhampton NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 10 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to await blood test results before discharge

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that there were clear indicators of an infection and before being discharged home by the hospital, it would have been best practice to wait for the blood tests results. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon; Unreliable hospital discharge processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Incorporate proactive blood-result review into postgraduate induction training and disseminate the requirement to postgraduate staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“There has been an agreed plan within ED to incorporate within the training portfolio of postgraduate doctors, the importance of an initiative-taking and proactive review of blood results prior to discharge of patients. Such training will be delivered at induction level.”

Source location

Response from The Royal Wolverhampton
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Allocate consultant work-plan time to review blood results in the ICE system within 24 hours.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Consultants on duty will be allocated time within their work plan to review blood results in the Clinical Webb Portal - ICE system (system which records all results), to review blood results in a timely manner (within 24 hours).”

Source location

Response from The Royal Wolverhampton
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use the ED clerking form’s investigations-and-results section to document blood-result review before discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“An ED clerking document is completed by reviewing staff including Doctors, within the Clerking form a section for investigations and results has been incorporated so that such results and investigations are documented. All Doctors/Clinicians will complete the investigations review section. This will be assurance and used as a checklist criteria to show evidence that results have been reviewed, as well as results being filed at the time they have been seen prior to the discharge of patients.”

Source location

Response from The Royal Wolverhampton
Page 2 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review and include the discharge blood-result process in ED policy and guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. To consider reviewing your policy and guidance on discharge of patients before blood test results are known particularly where there is evidence of infection showed.”

Source location

Response from The Royal Wolverhampton
Page 1 · response
Published 10 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026