Alan Joseph Whelan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 May 2026•West Yorkshire Eastern

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
3

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide a mental health assessment within 24 hours of transfer to the Segregation Unit for prisoners on an open ACCT document
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.10

  1. Ministry of Justice and Practice Plus Group

    Work with HMPPS nationally and locally to establish communications identifying ACCT patients moved to segregation.

  2. Ministry of Justice and Practice Plus Group

    Obtain site-level confirmation that the communication was actioned and monitor compliance regionally through the mental health steering group.

  3. Ministry of Justice and Practice Plus Group

    Revise the national mental health policy to require 24-hour mental health assessments for relevant ACCT prisoners placed in segregation.

  4. Ministry of Justice and Practice Plus Group

    Communicate the PSO1700 assessment requirement to regional managers and mental health leads, requesting consistent implementation across services.

  5. Ministry of Justice and Practice Plus Group

    Update the Take ACCTion audit to check compliance with PSO1700 and whether required mental health assessments occurred.

  6. HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice

    Complete the comprehensive review of the segregation policy.

  7. HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice

    Publish the revised Segregation Policy Framework.

  8. HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice

    Deliver scheduled briefing sessions to familiarise staff, including healthcare professionals, with the revised policy and its application.

  9. HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice

    Publish supporting tools and learning resources for implementing the updated Segregation Policy Framework.

  10. HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice

    Align the Segregation Policy Framework with the Safety Policy Framework to improve clarity and consistency, including healthcare provisions.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Ministry of Justice and Practice Plus Group

    The PS1700 requirement is an HMPPS policy outside PPG’s control, so PPG limits its response to healthcare matters.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. HM Prison and Probation Service and Ministry of Justice

    Practice Plus Group is responsible for responding separately to concerns about mental health assessment requirements for prisoners in segregation under ACCT.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a mental health assessment within 24 hours of transfer to the Segregation Unit for prisoners on an open ACCT document

Wider context from the report

“A mandatory requirement that a prisoner on an open ACCT document should have a mental health assessment within 24 hours of being transferred to the Segregation Unit was not complied with. Alan took steps that caused his death after that 24-hour window had closed. There was scant acknowledgement of this breach of a standing instruction from the witnesses who gave evidence to the inquest. The possibility that not carrying out such an assessment made no difference to the outcome is obvious. But that possibility neither explains nor excuses the failure to comply with the instruction, especially where it is unclear whether that failure was inadvertent or deliberate, and if deliberate, with what justification. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with HMPPS nationally and locally to establish communications identifying ACCT patients moved to segregation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, PPG will be working with HMPPS both at site level and nationally to ensure effective communications are in place between the two organisations to make sure patients who are on ACCTs and then moved to segregation are identified,”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Obtain site-level confirmation that the communication was actioned and monitor compliance regionally through the mental health steering group.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further, PPG has a mental health steering group, which meets quarterly, and is attended by all regional mental health leads, the National Mental Health & Psychosocial Lead, the Lead Psychiatrist and the Lead Psychologist. On the agenda at the next meeting, due to take place in July 2026, is obtaining confirmation that the aforementioned communication has been actioned at site levels and confirmation that compliance is being monitored at a regional level.”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the national mental health policy to require 24-hour mental health assessments for relevant ACCT prisoners placed in segregation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“PPG acknowledge that its policies do not contain an explicit requirement that matches PSO1700, i.e. that:”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Communicate the PSO1700 assessment requirement to regional managers and mental health leads, requesting consistent implementation across services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In the meantime, communication has been sent to PPG’s HIJ regional managers and regional mental health leads highlighting the requirement within PSO1700 and requesting that this is consistently implemented across all of our services. The role of PPG’s regional managers and regional mental health leads is to implement, communicate and embed processes and ensure compliance with the same.”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update the Take ACCTion audit to check compliance with PSO1700 and whether required mental health assessments occurred.

Verbatim wording from the response

“PPG already has a process in place, within its audit schedule, to audit ACCTs, which is called Take ACCTion. It is intended that the Take ACCTion audit will be updated to include whether there has been compliance with PSO1700, to check if a mental health assessment”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the comprehensive review of the segregation policy.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A comprehensive review of the segregation policy is currently underway, with publication of the revised framework scheduled for later this year. As part of this work, the Segregation Policy Framework has been aligned with the Safety Policy Framework to reduce duplication, improve clarity and strengthen consistency across related provisions, including healthcare. Under the Safety Policy Framework an ACCT case review must take place within 24 hours of a prisoner being placed in segregation conditions. Healthcare and/or mental health staff are required to attend the initial case review. In exceptional circumstances, where attendance is”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the revised Segregation Policy Framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A comprehensive review of the segregation policy is currently underway, with publication of the revised framework scheduled for later this year. As part of this work, the Segregation Policy Framework has been aligned with the Safety Policy Framework to reduce duplication, improve clarity and strengthen consistency across related provisions, including healthcare. Under the Safety Policy Framework an ACCT case review must take place within 24 hours of a prisoner being placed in segregation conditions. Healthcare and/or mental health staff are required to attend the initial case review. In exceptional circumstances, where attendance is”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver scheduled briefing sessions to familiarise staff, including healthcare professionals, with the revised policy and its application.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The updated Segregation Policy Framework will be published alongside a comprehensive suite of supporting tools and learning resources designed to support effective implementation within prisons and ensure staff are aware of the expectations. In addition, HMPPS will deliver a structured programme of scheduled briefing sessions, providing staff - including healthcare professionals- with the opportunity to familiarise themselves with the revised policy, and receive guidance on its application in practice.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish supporting tools and learning resources for implementing the updated Segregation Policy Framework.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The updated Segregation Policy Framework will be published alongside a comprehensive suite of supporting tools and learning resources designed to support effective implementation within prisons and ensure staff are aware of the expectations. In addition, HMPPS will deliver a structured programme of scheduled briefing sessions, providing staff - including healthcare professionals- with the opportunity to familiarise themselves with the revised policy, and receive guidance on its application in practice.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Align the Segregation Policy Framework with the Safety Policy Framework to improve clarity and consistency, including healthcare provisions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A comprehensive review of the segregation policy is currently underway, with publication of the revised framework scheduled for later this year. As part of this work, the Segregation Policy Framework has been aligned with the Safety Policy Framework to reduce duplication, improve clarity and strengthen consistency across related provisions, including healthcare. Under the Safety Policy Framework an ACCT case review must take place within 24 hours of a prisoner being placed in segregation conditions. Healthcare and/or mental health staff are required to attend the initial case review. In exceptional circumstances, where attendance is”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The PS1700 requirement is an HMPPS policy outside PPG’s control, so PPG limits its response to healthcare matters.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Practice Plus Group (“PPG”) would like to clarify that the document PS1700, referred to in the Regulation 28 report dated 7 May 2026, is a HMPPS policy and is not under the control of PPG.”

Source location

Response from Practice Plus Group
Page 2 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Practice Plus Group is responsible for responding separately to concerns about mental health assessment requirements for prisoners in segregation under ACCT.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following evidence heard at the inquest you raised a concern regarding the requirements for mental health assessments for prisoners held in segregation unit whilst being managed under ACCT procedures. I understand that Practice Plus Group will be responding to this matter separately.”

Source location

Response from HMPPS
Page 1 · response
Published 10 July 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
3/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026