PFD report

Ross Stephen Ballatine and 2 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jul 2023•North Wales (East and Central)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to respond adequately to issues identified through breakdowns requiring rescue at sea
  2. Failure to establish and apply a clear threshold for full stability assessments after significant vessel modifications
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.6

  1. Action

    Update surveyor guidance for investigating vessel modifications to include assessing their impact on stability.

    Stated by Maritime and Coastguard AgencyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  2. Action

    Implement strengthened stability requirements for fishing vessels under 15 metres, including stability records and confirmation during five-year certificate renewals.

    Stated by Maritime and Coastguard AgencyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.
  3. Action

    Conduct at least 250 ad hoc vessel inspections annually, considering vessel modifications and stability.

    Stated by Maritime and Coastguard AgencyStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 21 July 2023.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Reviewing 2,734 vessel files would require extensive work and still would not identify vessels whose modifications were unnotified.

    Stated by Maritime and Coastguard AgencyUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to respond adequately to issues identified through breakdowns requiring rescue at sea

Wider context from the report

“Although I was somewhat reassured to learn that the relevant Regulations have been revised and strengthened since these events, I am concerned that in this case (and, therefore, possibly in other cases) the Agency did not establish or apply a clear threshold in determining the need for a full stability assessment to be performed following significant modifications to the vessel. Too much reliance was placed on: (1) reassurances offered by the skipper of the vessel in relation to his appreciation of risk and/or his operational intentions (notably about the size and distribution of the load); and (2) informal visual assessments of the impact of the modifications which were undertaken whilst the vessel was in dock and was not under loaded conditions. In addition, insufficient concern arose from the issues identified on the two occasions when Holyhead Coastguard advised the Agency of the need to rescue the vessel following breakdowns at sea. I am concerned that other vessels (whether or a similar size or otherwise) may be operating, which have been modified since the issue of the original safety certificate and which require a full stability assessment before their operational safety can be properly evaluated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to establish and apply a clear threshold for full stability assessments after significant vessel modifications

Wider context from the report

“Although I was somewhat reassured to learn that the relevant Regulations have been revised and strengthened since these events, I am concerned that in this case (and, therefore, possibly in other cases) the Agency did not establish or apply a clear threshold in determining the need for a full stability assessment to be performed following significant modifications to the vessel. Too much reliance was placed on: (1) reassurances offered by the skipper of the vessel in relation to his appreciation of risk and/or his operational intentions (notably about the size and distribution of the load); and (2) informal visual assessments of the impact of the modifications which were undertaken whilst the vessel was in dock and was not under loaded conditions. In addition, insufficient concern arose from the issues identified on the two occasions when Holyhead Coastguard advised the Agency of the need to rescue the vessel following breakdowns at sea. I am concerned that other vessels (whether or a similar size or otherwise) may be operating, which have been modified since the issue of the original safety certificate and which require a full stability assessment before their operational safety can be properly evaluated. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update surveyor guidance for investigating vessel modifications to include assessing their impact on stability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Further, in September 2021, the MCA has updated its guidance to Surveyors in investigation of modifications MSIS27 Chapter 1 which includes an assessment of the impact on stability.”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement strengthened stability requirements for fishing vessels under 15 metres, including stability records and confirmation during five-year certificate renewals.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Code of Practice for the Safety of Small Fishing Vessels of less than 15 metres length overall MSN1871 Amendment 2 came into force on 6 September 2021.”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct at least 250 ad hoc vessel inspections annually, considering vessel modifications and stability.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Coroner is aware the MCA conducts ad hoc inspections. These commenced in 2021 as concentrated inspection campaigns and now form part of MCA's usual Surveying business. A minimum of 250 vessels are inspected on an ad hoc basis per year and the inspections consider vessel modifications and stability.”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Identify vessels not yet inspected and contact them directly about the urgent safety bulletin.

Verbatim wording from the response

“2,734 vessels currently remain to be inspected against this Code as part of the 5 yearly inspection regime by 5 September 2026.”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and disseminate an urgent safety bulletin explaining modification-reporting and stability-assessment requirements to the fishing industry.

Verbatim wording from the response

“However, in order to go beyond the ad hoc inspections and seek to capture any vessels of less than 15 metres length overall within the 2,734 which potentially may not be due an inspection until September 2026, but may have made modifications which have not been notified to the MCA, the MCA published an Urgent Safety bulletin on 4 September 2023 Safety bulletin 32 - Vessel modifications increasing risk”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require follow-up inspections after fatality, serious injury, serious damage or major mechanical breakdown, including review of prior inspections and current Code compliance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In response to the Coroner's comment regarding insufficient concern having been given following the two breakdowns of the Nicola Faith at sea, the MCA had published MSIS27 Annex 23 in April 2020.”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reviewing 2,734 vessel files would require extensive work and still would not identify vessels whose modifications were unnotified.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To identify vessels that may have informed MCA prior to 6 September 2021 of modifications they intend to carry out (which may or may not have been completed) would require an extensive review of all files relating to those 2,734 vessels. This process would also not identify any vessels which may have carried out modifications without notifying MCA.”

Source location

Response from Maritime & Coastguard Agency
Page 2 · response
Published 21 July 2023

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026