PFD report

Suzanne Roberts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Dec 2019•West Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Ineffective communication across departments about patient treatment
  2. Ineffective management of patient records across multiple systems and paper records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ineffective communication across departments about patient treatment

Wider context from the report

“A Senior Consultant at the RSCH gave evidence at the Inquest in December 2019 and described the current system of managing patient records at the RSCH as “sub-optimal” and “flawed” and that a similar death to that of Suzanne Roberts could occur (in the same circumstance as seen in October 2015) in December 2019 The Jury found the management of patient records at the RSCH to be ineffective, as was cross Department communication in relation to patient treatment The Jury also found ineffective communication and ineffective use of patient records within the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics in relation to patient treatment Whilst there was evidence that £30m had been recently spent by the Brighton and Sussex Universities Hospital NHS Trust on a failed attempt to create a single electronic patient record, the Inquest revealed that There were at least three software systems in use by different Departments at RSCH, alongside paper records, and that a portal system, Panda, was also potentially in place In the absence of mandatory rules for the use of those systems or portal, and mandatory quality assurance about data uploaded to those systems or portal, there is a continuing risk of future deaths due to ineffective management of patient records and ineffective communication across departments at RSCH ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Ineffective management of patient records across multiple systems and paper records

Wider context from the report

“A Senior Consultant at the RSCH gave evidence at the Inquest in December 2019 and described the current system of managing patient records at the RSCH as “sub-optimal” and “flawed” and that a similar death to that of Suzanne Roberts could occur (in the same circumstance as seen in October 2015) in December 2019 The Jury found the management of patient records at the RSCH to be ineffective, as was cross Department communication in relation to patient treatment The Jury also found ineffective communication and ineffective use of patient records within the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics in relation to patient treatment Whilst there was evidence that £30m had been recently spent by the Brighton and Sussex Universities Hospital NHS Trust on a failed attempt to create a single electronic patient record, the Inquest revealed that There were at least three software systems in use by different Departments at RSCH, alongside paper records, and that a portal system, Panda, was also potentially in place In the absence of mandatory rules for the use of those systems or portal, and mandatory quality assurance about data uploaded to those systems or portal, there is a continuing risk of future deaths due to ineffective management of patient records and ineffective communication across departments at RSCH ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.