PFD report

Michael Anthony Tarratt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 14 Mar 2014•Leicester City and South Leicestershire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to exchange prescription information between treatment services and the GP
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care servicesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable communication of critical medication information to GPsPart of recurring concern: Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated carePart of recurring concern: Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures
  2. Failure to maintain regular contact between treatment services and the GP
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Audit case notes for GP correspondence within 14 days and repeat the audit every six months.

    Stated by Leicestershire Partnership NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 March 2014.
  2. Action

    Upload reviewed GP letter templates with prompts for detailed updates into SystmOne.

    Stated by Leicestershire Partnership NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 14 March 2014.
  3. Action

    Notify Drug and Alcohol team staff of required GP communication after assessment, at least every three months, when treatment changes or risks arise, and at discharge.

    Stated by Leicestershire Partnership NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 March 2014.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to exchange prescription information between treatment services and the GP

Wider context from the report

“(2) Despite Evidence that the GP prescription of tramadol (for knee pain) was inappropriate for an opiate dependent patient, no contact was made with the GP surgery and it was left to the patient to tell his GP. There was no evidence to suggest that Mr Tarratt did this. Consideration should be given to routine exchange of information regarding prescriptions between services, to avoid one agency counter-acting the treatment of the other. Consideration should be given to the appropriateness of asking the patient to be responsible for this communication. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to communicate clinically important information reliably between care services; Unreliable communication of critical medication information to GPs; Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care; Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain regular contact between treatment services and the GP

Wider context from the report

“(1) Despite Evidence from the Drug and Alcohol team that it was appropriate to update the relevant GP every 3 months, or at least every 6 months, it was accepted on this occasion that no contact had been made for 18 months. Consideration should be given to more regular contact between the services providing treatment. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit case notes for GP correspondence within 14 days and repeat the audit every six months.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A case note audit is due to take place within the next 14 days and will include a review of GP correspondence. Audits will be completed every 6 months thereafter.”

Source location

2014-0115-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upload reviewed GP letter templates with prompts for detailed updates into SystmOne.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I enclose a copy of the standard GP letter templates which have been reviewed and now include prompts to ensure detailed updates are sent. These are due to be uploaded as part of the configuration with SystmOne within the next 14 days. The subsequent phase of work that will be completed by June 30th 2014 at the latest will include prompts and reminders to practitioners when GP updates are due.”

Source location

2014-0115-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Notify Drug and Alcohol team staff of required GP communication after assessment, at least every three months, when treatment changes or risks arise, and at discharge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A notification by way of urgent memo by email has been sent to all members of the Drug & Alcohol team that the agreed standard for communication and correspondence with patients’ GPs is that contact must be made with the GP:”

Source location

2014-0115-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement SystmOne prompts and reminders to alert practitioners when GP updates are due.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I enclose a copy of the standard GP letter templates which have been reviewed and now include prompts to ensure detailed updates are sent. These are due to be uploaded as part of the configuration with SystmOne within the next 14 days. The subsequent phase of work that will be completed by June 30th 2014 at the latest will include prompts and reminders to practitioners when GP updates are due.”

Source location

2014-0115-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish the Leicester Recovery Partnership standard operating protocol defining GP communication requirements for structured treatment and open access services.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Leicester Recovery Partnership’s working draft Standard Operating Protocol (SOP) is under review and due for publication within the next few weeks. In relation to GP communication the SOP will state:”

Source location

2014-0115-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Discuss GP communication requirements at the Operational Managers meeting and include them on the next Neighbourhood Team meeting agenda.

    Stated by Leicestershire Partnership NHS TrustStatus at responseThe respondent said that this action was partly complete when they made their response on 14 March 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Discuss GP communication requirements at the Operational Managers meeting and include them on the next Neighbourhood Team meeting agenda.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This matter has also been discussed at the Operational Managers meeting to highlight the need to include in staff supervision any training requirements or ongoing monitoring. It will also be included on the agenda of the next Neighbourhood Team meeting.”

Source location

2014-0115-Response-by-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 14 March 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026