PFD report

Anne Roberts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 18 Oct 2018•Berkshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Failure to manage choking risk during bedroom meals alongside risks of harm to patients and others
  2. Failure to disseminate information relating to choking risk
  3. Failure to maintain full, accurate, and up-to-date hospital records about choking risk
    Part of recurring concern: Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to manage choking risk during bedroom meals alongside risks of harm to patients and others

Wider context from the report

“3. Concerns about how risk of choking is managed when patients eat in their bedrooms in conjunction with managing risk of harm to themselves and others at the same time. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to disseminate information relating to choking risk

Wider context from the report

“2. Concerns about the dissemination of information relating to risk of choking particularly with respect to ensuring that hospital records are full, accurate, and up to date. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain full, accurate, and up-to-date hospital records about choking risk

Wider context from the report

“2. Concerns about the dissemination of information relating to risk of choking particularly with respect to ensuring that hospital records are full, accurate, and up to date. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of front-line ward staff training on the interaction between mental disorders and choking risks

Wider context from the report

“4. Training of front-line ward staff (including nurses and healthcare assistants/support workers) around the interaction between mental disorders and choking risks, as distinct from choking risks caused by dysphagia ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of training for bank staff in caring for patients at risk of choking

Wider context from the report

“1. Concerns about the training of Bank Staff in relation to the care of patients at risk of choking, including patients who are mentally ill. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unsafe implementation of choking-risk prevention measures.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.