PFD report

Jon David JAMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Feb 2020•South Wales Central

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
1

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Rising deaths related to acute behavioural disturbance
  2. Lack of current NICE guidance on acute behavioural disturbance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Undertake the full NG10 update, including considering whether to extend its scope to ABD and clarify recommendation 1.5.5 terminology.

    Stated by National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 9 March 2020.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Rising deaths related to acute behavioural disturbance

Wider context from the report

“1. Extensive evidence was received from a Consultant Forensic Pathologist and an expert who is a lead trainer for South Wales Police. They were both of the firm opinion that the publication of NICE guidance on the subject of Acute Behavioural Disturbance would be of vital benefit in preventing future deaths. 2. ABD is clearly a complex topic, with understanding ever-increasing. There have been other PFD reports from coroners seeking to implement national training and guidance on ABD, primarily for frontline police, emergency call handlers and paramedics. However, it is only the paramountcy of NICE guidance that would place ABD at the forefront of the national agenda. Critically, such guidance would be of enormous practical use not only to medical professionals, but also to police and any others who find themselves in the difficult position of having to respond to an individual exhibiting signs of ABD in either public places or clinical settings. 3. There is no current NICE guidance dealing specifically with ABD, and the number of deaths related to it is rising. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of current NICE guidance on acute behavioural disturbance

Wider context from the report

“1. Extensive evidence was received from a Consultant Forensic Pathologist and an expert who is a lead trainer for South Wales Police. They were both of the firm opinion that the publication of NICE guidance on the subject of Acute Behavioural Disturbance would be of vital benefit in preventing future deaths. 2. ABD is clearly a complex topic, with understanding ever-increasing. There have been other PFD reports from coroners seeking to implement national training and guidance on ABD, primarily for frontline police, emergency call handlers and paramedics. However, it is only the paramountcy of NICE guidance that would place ABD at the forefront of the national agenda. Critically, such guidance would be of enormous practical use not only to medical professionals, but also to police and any others who find themselves in the difficult position of having to respond to an individual exhibiting signs of ABD in either public places or clinical settings. 3. There is no current NICE guidance dealing specifically with ABD, and the number of deaths related to it is rising. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Undertake the full NG10 update, including considering whether to extend its scope to ABD and clarify recommendation 1.5.5 terminology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Our guideline on violence and aggression (NG10) is due to undergo a full update in due course and your concerns have been noted for further consideration by the guidelines team as part of this work, including whether it is appropriate for the scope of NG10 to be extended to cover ABD, and any necessary clarification to the terminology in recommendation 1.5.5.”

Source location

2020-0042-Response-from-NICE
Page 1 · response
Published 9 March 2020

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026