PFD report

Johnpaul Digweed · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Jun 2026•Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Welfare-check instructions failing to require visual checks of prisoners
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners
  2. Failure to ensure critical welfare-check instructions are received and understood by affected staff
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to verify staff receipt and understanding of safety policies
  3. Failure to ensure removal of coverings from cell-door observation panels
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisonersPart of recurring concern: Unreliable prison cell-hatch observation of prisoners
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Introduce daily mandatory knowledge-check sessions for operational and non-operational staff, recording attendance, completion and understanding to reinforce ACCT and welfare-check practice.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 3 September 2026.
  2. Action

    Make hard copies of current staff notices available on every residential wing for reference and use during staff briefings.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 3 September 2026.
  3. Action

    Reissue the Governor’s Order reminding staff of mandatory instructions for prisoner wellbeing and responding to blocked observation panels.

    Stated by HM Prison and Probation ServiceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 3 September 2026.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Welfare-check instructions failing to require visual checks of prisoners

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was heard that there is a regular practice of prisoner's covering their observation panels in their cell doors at HMP Garth. Despite Governor's Orders and staff instructions being in place requiring staff to take steps to ensure any inundation is removed, this was not being adhered to. Evidence was heard that some staff were not aware of the instructions which were issued by email. As a result, the orders and notices have been updated and reissued by email clarifying expectations in relation to welfare checks and steps requires if observations panels are obscured. However, no assurance could be given that staff had read and understood the instructions or that there was any system outside the email system to ensure important information is cascaded and seen by affected staff. In addition, whilst the amended instructions confirm a verbal response is mandatory for welfare checks, they do not explicitly state a visual check of the prisoner is also required. Given your responsibility for HMP Garth, I consider you are responsible for taking the action that is required to prevent future deaths ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure critical welfare-check instructions are received and understood by affected staff

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was heard that there is a regular practice of prisoner's covering their observation panels in their cell doors at HMP Garth. Despite Governor's Orders and staff instructions being in place requiring staff to take steps to ensure any inundation is removed, this was not being adhered to. Evidence was heard that some staff were not aware of the instructions which were issued by email. As a result, the orders and notices have been updated and reissued by email clarifying expectations in relation to welfare checks and steps requires if observations panels are obscured. However, no assurance could be given that staff had read and understood the instructions or that there was any system outside the email system to ensure important information is cascaded and seen by affected staff. In addition, whilst the amended instructions confirm a verbal response is mandatory for welfare checks, they do not explicitly state a visual check of the prisoner is also required. Given your responsibility for HMP Garth, I consider you are responsible for taking the action that is required to prevent future deaths ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to verify staff receipt and understanding of safety policies.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to ensure removal of coverings from cell-door observation panels

Wider context from the report

“2. Evidence was heard that there is a regular practice of prisoner's covering their observation panels in their cell doors at HMP Garth. Despite Governor's Orders and staff instructions being in place requiring staff to take steps to ensure any inundation is removed, this was not being adhered to. Evidence was heard that some staff were not aware of the instructions which were issued by email. As a result, the orders and notices have been updated and reissued by email clarifying expectations in relation to welfare checks and steps requires if observations panels are obscured. However, no assurance could be given that staff had read and understood the instructions or that there was any system outside the email system to ensure important information is cascaded and seen by affected staff. In addition, whilst the amended instructions confirm a verbal response is mandatory for welfare checks, they do not explicitly state a visual check of the prisoner is also required. Given your responsibility for HMP Garth, I consider you are responsible for taking the action that is required to prevent future deaths ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate supervision and monitoring of prisoners; Unreliable prison cell-hatch observation of prisoners.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain and monitor staff competence in opening an ACCT where required

Wider context from the report

“1. Evidence was heard that despite several staff being aware of incidents of self-harm involving a prisoner at HMP Garth an Assessment, Care in Custody Teamwork process (ACCT) was not opened. Whilst evidence was provided that staff are trained as part of their induction program and that training materials is available to staff, no assurance could be given that there was any ongoing mandatory refresher training or any system in place to monitor understanding that every member of staff is responsible for opening an ACCT where required. Given your responsibility for HMP Garth, I consider you are responsible for taking the action that is required to prevent future deaths ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce daily mandatory knowledge-check sessions for operational and non-operational staff, recording attendance, completion and understanding to reinforce ACCT and welfare-check practice.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The prison have begun introducing daily knowledge check sessions for both operational and non-operational staff, and additional staffing resources are being secured to support the delivery of this initiative. Attendance and completion of the knowledge check sessions will be required and formally recorded, with staff providing written confirmation they have attended a session, and that the content is understood. A training log will be maintained by the prison’s Learning and Capabilities Team to monitor attendance and completion rates.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Make hard copies of current staff notices available on every residential wing for reference and use during staff briefings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“To ensure that staff notices are accessible to all operational staff, hard copies of current notices will be made available on each residential wing so they can be referenced by staff at all times and used by managers and supervising officers during staff briefings.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reissue the Governor’s Order reminding staff of mandatory instructions for prisoner wellbeing and responding to blocked observation panels.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Furthermore, to reinforce local guidance a Governor’s Order has been reissued reminding staff of the mandatory instructions in place in line with PSI 75/2011, and the requirement to ensure the wellbeing of prisoners and action to be taken should a blocked observation panel be discovered.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add read-and-understood acknowledgements to staff-notice emails and create a response database to identify non-responders for follow-up.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In addition, all emails containing staff notices will include an acknowledgement function requiring recipients to confirm they have read and understood the content of the notice. This acknowledgement will be used to create a database to record which members of staff have responded, and aid the identification of those who have not thus enabling appropriate follow-up action where necessary.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 2 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Secure additional staffing resources to support delivery of the daily knowledge-check sessions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The prison have begun introducing daily knowledge check sessions for both operational and non-operational staff, and additional staffing resources are being secured to support the delivery of this initiative. Attendance and completion of the knowledge check sessions will be required and formally recorded, with staff providing written confirmation they have attended a session, and that the content is understood. A training log will be maintained by the prison’s Learning and Capabilities Team to monitor attendance and completion rates.”

Source location

Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
Page 1 · response
Published 3 September 2026

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026