PFD report

JJ Wilson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Jul 2018•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to require fire retardant overalls for test track drivers
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate clarity of fire-safety standards and guidance
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    FIA clothing requirements fall outside HSE’s remit for comment.

    Stated by Health and Safety ExecutiveOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to require fire retardant overalls for test track drivers

Wider context from the report

“The Court heard evidence that whilst there are regulations regarding clothing to be worn during race events, set by the FIA, there are no regulations for clothing to be worn whilst testing a racing car on a test track. The Court heard evidence that JJ was wearing racing boots, gloves and a new Schuberth race helmet, but was wearing ordinary combat trousers. The Court heard evidence that racing overalls were available had JJ wanted to wear these. Whilst ████████ for the Surrey Police Collision Investigation Unit confirmed in her evidence that JJ’s clothing would not have made any difference to the sad outcome in this case, I am concerned that fire retardant overalls are not a requirement to be worn by all test track drivers. - It is not obligatory for fire retardant overalls to be worn by test track drivers which creates a potential risk of death or serious injury in the event of a crash in circumstances similar to that which caused the death of JJ Wilson; Consideration should be given to whether any steps can be taken to address the above concerns. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate clarity of fire-safety standards and guidance.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

FIA clothing requirements fall outside HSE’s remit for comment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The requirements within the FIA Regulations are outside the comment of the HSE but as said earlier FIA Sports rules and regulations are required to have notice and compliance to health and safety law and where there is a gap it is for them as the sport’s governing body to close this gap and ensure compliance.”

Source location

2019-0243-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Any gap in FIA requirements must be closed by FIA, as the sport’s governing body, to ensure compliance with health and safety law.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The requirements within the FIA Regulations are outside the comment of the HSE but as said earlier FIA Sports rules and regulations are required to have notice and compliance to health and safety law and where there is a gap it is for them as the sport’s governing body to close this gap and ensure compliance.”

Source location

2019-0243-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Existing UK law requiring foreseeable-risk assessment, including fire-retardant overalls, addresses the concern when requirements are implemented and instructions followed.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Having reviewed the information and legislation in place, regarding the need for assessment of foreseeable risk, it is concluded that there is no gap when the applicable legislation in relation to duties and the workplace if the current requirements are implemented and instructions followed. HSE considers that no action is required because existing UK law includes the requirement to assess, along with many other risks surrounding the activity, the need for wearing of fire-retardant overalls.”

Source location

2019-0243-Response-by-HSE
Page 2 · response
Published 12 September 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026