PFD report

Jade Hutchings · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 28 Oct 2022•West Sussex

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
12

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Lack of REBOOT provision for older children nearing 18
  2. Failure of police officers to read the mental health guide in full
  3. Inadequate police mental health training
    Part of recurring concern: Insufficient police training for safe recognition and response to mental-health and behaviour-related medical crises
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.7

  1. Action

    Enhance and update initial mental-health training for all new officers, including legal powers, vulnerability, equality and cultural influences.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.
  2. Action

    Deliver mental-health training to all control-room operators, including guidance on mental-health-related calls and Section 136 detentions.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 19 December 2022.
  3. Action

    Deliver mental-health content through mandatory personal-safety, inspector and custody-officer training, including crisis recognition, de-escalation and Section 136 procedures.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The College of Policing does not deliver the purported two-day classroom course, and forces have discretion over which programme elements officers undertake.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of REBOOT provision for older children nearing 18

Wider context from the report

“2. REBOOT - Lack of provision for older age group There was clear evidence that Jade was vulnerable and had become involved in violence and crime in 2019 (the year before his death). It was believed by some that Jade exploited by gangs running county line drug operations. A need for an early intervention was identified by his social worker and a referral to Reboot was made. The Inquest was told that at the time REBOOT was prioritising 12 – 14 years children and as Jade was nearing 18 they were unable to work with him. This was a missed opportunity for Jade to be involved in a form of early intervention before his life started unravelling and he became more heavily entrenched in the world of crime. It is understood that at the time of Jade’s death the Police and Crime Commissioner was responsible for the REBOOT scheme but at the time of writing this report the scheme is now run by Sussex Police. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of police officers to read the mental health guide in full

Wider context from the report

“1. Inadequate Police training on Mental Health During the course of the Inquest officers involved in dealing with Jade (and in particular around the exercise of their Section 136 powers on 21/5/20) acknowledged that they had received very little mental health training. Some officers could not recall any additional training provided since their initial training when they first joined the force. The officers admitted that although they were aware of the Sussex Police mental health guide they had not read it in full. The expert police witness, ████████, told the Inquest that in his view the online training provision that we were told was being rolled out in Sussex was not sufficient. None of the officers involved in this case had yet undertaken this online training. It was his opinion that officers should be provided with the nationally recognised two day training course written by the College of Policing, The course is available for all Police forces to be rolled out locally. This training had not been adopted by Sussex Police. There was also confusion amongst Officers (and a lack of clear understanding) around the provision and use of service the Haven at Millview could provide. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate police mental health training

Wider context from the report

“1. Inadequate Police training on Mental Health During the course of the Inquest officers involved in dealing with Jade (and in particular around the exercise of their Section 136 powers on 21/5/20) acknowledged that they had received very little mental health training. Some officers could not recall any additional training provided since their initial training when they first joined the force. The officers admitted that although they were aware of the Sussex Police mental health guide they had not read it in full. The expert police witness, ████████, told the Inquest that in his view the online training provision that we were told was being rolled out in Sussex was not sufficient. None of the officers involved in this case had yet undertaken this online training. It was his opinion that officers should be provided with the nationally recognised two day training course written by the College of Policing, The course is available for all Police forces to be rolled out locally. This training had not been adopted by Sussex Police. There was also confusion amongst Officers (and a lack of clear understanding) around the provision and use of service the Haven at Millview could provide. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Insufficient police training for safe recognition and response to mental-health and behaviour-related medical crises.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Confusion among police officers about the provision and use of the Haven at Millview service

Wider context from the report

“1. Inadequate Police training on Mental Health During the course of the Inquest officers involved in dealing with Jade (and in particular around the exercise of their Section 136 powers on 21/5/20) acknowledged that they had received very little mental health training. Some officers could not recall any additional training provided since their initial training when they first joined the force. The officers admitted that although they were aware of the Sussex Police mental health guide they had not read it in full. The expert police witness, ████████, told the Inquest that in his view the online training provision that we were told was being rolled out in Sussex was not sufficient. None of the officers involved in this case had yet undertaken this online training. It was his opinion that officers should be provided with the nationally recognised two day training course written by the College of Policing, The course is available for all Police forces to be rolled out locally. This training had not been adopted by Sussex Police. There was also confusion amongst Officers (and a lack of clear understanding) around the provision and use of service the Haven at Millview could provide. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable Haven at Millview service arrangements.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enhance and update initial mental-health training for all new officers, including legal powers, vulnerability, equality and cultural influences.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Mental health training is provided to all Student Officers in Sussex during their initial training programme. In December 2020 the initial training package was enhanced and again updated in March 2022. The training being delivered to all new officers joining Sussex Police at the time of writing (December 2022) is set out below.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mental-health training to all control-room operators, including guidance on mental-health-related calls and Section 136 detentions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Current courses now include a mental health training input on the following mandatory courses:”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mental-health content through mandatory personal-safety, inspector and custody-officer training, including crisis recognition, de-escalation and Section 136 procedures.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Personal Safety Training”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 4 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver mandatory mental-health continuing professional development, including College of Policing e-learning and related legislation, incident-response and suicide-response modules.

Verbatim wording from the response

“1. The College of Policing e-learning module. – Mental Health and the Police This module has already been included in our CPD programme and all response officers must have completed this as part of the CPD schedule in 2022.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish and add a concise Section 136 detention and Blue Light Line guide to the Crewmate application for frontline officer reference.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We understand this observation to relate to the wider context of the ‘Blue Light Line’ (of which the Haven at Millview forms part), the telephone provision provided by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust for officers to use for consultation about mental health incidents, namely when they are considering using their powers under s136 of the Mental Health Act (1983).”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and deliver mental-health and policing training under oversight from a mental-health social worker and in line with College of Policing guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All training that is delivered by Sussex Police on Mental Health & Policing is in line with the College of Policing’s APP on Mental Health & Policing and is currently developed and delivered with oversight from a mental health social worker.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 5 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Launch and fund REBOOT as an early-intervention programme supporting young people at risk of serious violence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I named and launched the REBOOT initiative in 2019, as an early intervention youth programme and local response to the Government’s Serious Violence Strategy. To do this, I secured one-off funding of £890,616 from the Home Office’s Early Intervention Youth Fund to increase support for young people in Sussex who were at risk of becoming involved in serious violence. This additional funding was over and above the annual policing budget for Sussex and complimentary to the wider Sussex statutory services provided to young people by local authorities and their youth justice and social services.”

Source location

Response from Police and Crime Commissioner
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The College of Policing does not deliver the purported two-day classroom course, and forces have discretion over which programme elements officers undertake.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The comments and concerns of the Expert Police Witness, ████████ in relation to Sussex officers undertaking the College of Policing (CoP) two-day training course, have been carefully considered. The College of Policing do not deliver a two-day classroom-based learning course but do offer a ‘Mental Health Programme’ (published in October 2021) intended to support the Police Service to develop and deliver their own ‘in house’ training programme. The College of Policing recommend a ‘target audience’ for each module of their Mental Health Programme and individual forces are given discretion as to who would be more appropriate to attend specific parts of the programme; for example, the target audience for developing a strategic response to mental health is aimed at Inspectors and above up to and including NPCC and police staff equivalent.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

REBOOT cannot support every young person referred because available funding and programme capacity are limited.

Verbatim wording from the response

“REBOOT was co-designed with local statutory and non-statutory partners and was aimed at complementing existing services provided by statutory agencies to identify young people showing signs of taking part in risky behaviours and on the periphery of becoming involved in serious violence. REBOOT was not intended as an alternative criminal justice pathway where a young person was already part of Youth Justice Service case load. It was acknowledged by all agencies at the outset that the additional funds, albeit significant, would be unlikely to satisfy the total demand across Sussex and, hence, only those young people displaying the greatest risk would take priority. Initially it was anticipated this funding would provide services for around 300 young people.”

Source location

Response from Police and Crime Commissioner
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. 1

    Relaunch the Mental Health Guide on the internal website and frontline mobile applications, including accessible suicide, safeguarding and Section 136 guidance.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.
  2. 2

    Complete rollout of a modern body-worn video platform with rapid camera replacement, low-battery alerts and pre-recording.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.
  3. 3

    Run weekly bad-battery reporting, remove affected cameras from service, arrange repairs and use supplier warranty coverage for replacement batteries.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.
  4. 4

    Refresh policy governing body-worn video use by officers and staff.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.
  5. 5

    Continue scrutinising Sussex Police’s response to young people at risk of serious violence, including REBOOT, through monthly Performance Accountability Meetings.

    Stated by Police and Crime Commissioner for SussexStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 19 December 2022.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.4

  1. 1

    Police officers are not mental health practitioners, so their role does not require in-depth knowledge of all mental health conditions.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceOutside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  2. 2

    Children with level 3 or 4 needs remain the responsibility of statutory services because Reboot is intended only for level 2 early intervention.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  3. 3

    The new BWV platform and battery-management arrangements are considered sufficient to prevent recurrence of battery-related recording concerns.

    Stated by Sussex PoliceExisting arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
  4. 4

    Sussex Police is responsible for coordinating and funding REBOOT as part of its embedded targeted response.

    Stated by Police and Crime Commissioner for SussexRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Relaunch the Mental Health Guide on the internal website and frontline mobile applications, including accessible suicide, safeguarding and Section 136 guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Sussex Police Mental Health Guide was been relaunched on the Sussex Police internal website which is available to all staff. It has also been added to apps which are available on mobile devices provided to all frontline staff. Resources designed to be easily accessible to support officers at the point of need and provide a quick and readily available reference point include the “Crewmate” and “Quick links” apps, which are both available to officers and staff on their Mobile Data Terminals (MDT) this makes the information accessible whilst attending incidents. Some of the resources available on “Crewmate” are:”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete rollout of a modern body-worn video platform with rapid camera replacement, low-battery alerts and pre-recording.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the sad death of Ms Hutchings Sussex Police has completed a roll out of a more modern BWV platform, as well as refreshing policy on BWV usage by officers and staff. This new system allows colleagues to swap out a camera with low battery life for a new one with a fully charged battery within seconds, this is very different from the previous system which were personal issue cameras which relied upon officers and staff charging their own cameras. This system allows officers to have the best available camera in terms of battery life. The new cameras also have an audible low battery alert giving officers notice that they will be required to swap their current camera for a new one as soon as possible.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 20.12
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Run weekly bad-battery reporting, remove affected cameras from service, arrange repairs and use supplier warranty coverage for replacement batteries.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Additionally our BWV managing team run a weekly “bad battery” report to determine cameras that may have battery issue to allow them to removed from service and a fix to be made. This feeds into the contract that we have with the supplier to ensure that new batteries are covered under the warranty ensuring they are fixed in a timely way.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 20.12
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Refresh policy governing body-worn video use by officers and staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the sad death of Ms Hutchings Sussex Police has completed a roll out of a more modern BWV platform, as well as refreshing policy on BWV usage by officers and staff. This new system allows colleagues to swap out a camera with low battery life for a new one with a fully charged battery within seconds, this is very different from the previous system which were personal issue cameras which relied upon officers and staff charging their own cameras. This system allows officers to have the best available camera in terms of battery life. The new cameras also have an audible low battery alert giving officers notice that they will be required to swap their current camera for a new one as soon as possible.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 20.12
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue scrutinising Sussex Police’s response to young people at risk of serious violence, including REBOOT, through monthly Performance Accountability Meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In terms of further action, in my role as the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner, I have a statutory duty to hold the Chief Constable to account for policing in its totality and, at my monthly webcast Performance Accountability Meetings (PAM) I regularly scrutinise the Chief Constable over how Sussex Police responds to the risks of young people becoming involved in serious violence and will continue to do so. This scrutiny includes how REBOOT continues to play a part in such matters. The last time I enquired into REBOOT at a PAM was on 18ᵗʰ March 2022, the meeting and minutes can be viewed on the following link: SPCC - Watch Live (sussex-pcc.gov.uk)”

Source location

Response from Police and Crime Commissioner
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police officers are not mental health practitioners, so their role does not require in-depth knowledge of all mental health conditions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“It is important to note that Police Officers are not Mental Health Practitioners, and it is not their police role to have an in-depth knowledge of all mental health conditions and circumstances. Whilst the policing responsibility should predominantly be the prevention and detection of crime, it is highly likely that Police officers and Police staff will encounter people who are vulnerable due to mental health. This could be in a criminal justice capacity such as a victim, witness or suspect of a crime and also in a health care capacity when exercising police powers to support health care agencies. It is of course incumbent that Police Officers are aware of their powers under s136 and s135 of the Mental Health Act (1983); Mental Health Codes of Practice and the Mental Capacity Act (2005), and this is incorporated into existing training.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 3 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Children with level 3 or 4 needs remain the responsibility of statutory services because Reboot is intended only for level 2 early intervention.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Reboot is intended to be an early intervention, specifically targeted to a child who is at Level 2 of the Continuum of Need, and has the following indicators:”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 21.12
Page 6 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The new BWV platform and battery-management arrangements are considered sufficient to prevent recurrence of battery-related recording concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Since the sad death of Ms Hutchings Sussex Police has completed a roll out of a more modern BWV platform, as well as refreshing policy on BWV usage by officers and staff. This new system allows colleagues to swap out a camera with low battery life for a new one with a fully charged battery within seconds, this is very different from the previous system which were personal issue cameras which relied upon officers and staff charging their own cameras. This system allows officers to have the best available camera in terms of battery life. The new cameras also have an audible low battery alert giving officers notice that they will be required to swap their current camera for a new one as soon as possible.”

Source location

Response from Sussex Police 20.12
Page 1 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Sussex Police is responsible for coordinating and funding REBOOT as part of its embedded targeted response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following on from the initial success of REBOOT, I funded the programme for an additional year in 2020/21 at a cost of £734,532 from my budget. During this period, the positive outcomes were verified and, in April 2021, co-ordination of the REBOOT scheme was migrated across to Sussex Police to become part of the embedded targeted response for the needs of young people in Sussex and funded from the force’s core budget.”

Source location

Response from Police and Crime Commissioner
Page 2 · response
Published 19 December 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026