PFD report

Carl Wright · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Oct 2022•Nottinghamshire

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of easy access to input from more experienced doctors
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care
  2. Inexperienced junior doctors providing the majority of medical care and assessing deteriorating patients
  3. Failure to review most blood test results in a timely manner
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Develop induction guidelines and an escalation process for junior doctors managing patients at risk of deterioration in Linden Lodge.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 20 October 2022.
  2. Action

    Use a specialty referral and escalation procedure for City Campus patients based on their presenting condition.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 October 2022.
  3. Action

    Require consultant assessment and review before transferring inpatients to Linden Lodge.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 20 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of easy access to input from more experienced doctors

Wider context from the report

“(1) The majority of medical care, including the identification and assessment of deteriorating patients, was done by inexperienced junior doctors with no easy access to input from more experienced doctors; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide effective senior clinical oversight of patient care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inexperienced junior doctors providing the majority of medical care and assessing deteriorating patients

Wider context from the report

“(1) The majority of medical care, including the identification and assessment of deteriorating patients, was done by inexperienced junior doctors with no easy access to input from more experienced doctors; ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review most blood test results in a timely manner

Wider context from the report

“(2) There was an established culture and practice of most blood tests results not being reviewed in a timely manner. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop induction guidelines and an escalation process for junior doctors managing patients at risk of deterioration in Linden Lodge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All patients who are planned to be transferred from an NUH in patient bed into Linden Lodge are now required to be physically assessed and reviewed by a Consultant from Linden Lodge, prior to transfer. This is to ensure that the patient is medically stable and suitable for transfer and for care within the Neuro-Rehabilitation Unit. The team are developing induction guidelines for junior doctors working in Linden Lodge, supported by an escalation process where a patient may be at risk of clinical deterioration [completion date 31/12/2022].”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use a specialty referral and escalation procedure for City Campus patients based on their presenting condition.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A Standard Operating Procedure [SOP] has previously been developed which outlines which medical speciality should be referred/escalated to at the City campus based on the presenting condition. For example, if postoperatively a City-based patient has signs of post-operative pneumonia the guidance means the responsible surgical team contacts the Specialty Registrar [SPR] for advice which in this scenario would be from the respiratory team, with the patient remaining under the care of the surgical team unless the respiratory team formally transfer the patient under their care. There are a small group of patients who do not clearly “fit” into this process, for example, presentations such as sepsis of unknown origin.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require consultant assessment and review before transferring inpatients to Linden Lodge.

Verbatim wording from the response

“All patients who are planned to be transferred from an NUH in patient bed into Linden Lodge are now required to be physically assessed and reviewed by a Consultant from Linden Lodge, prior to transfer. This is to ensure that the patient is medically stable and suitable for transfer and for care within the Neuro-Rehabilitation Unit. The team are developing induction guidelines for junior doctors working in Linden Lodge, supported by an escalation process where a patient may be at risk of clinical deterioration [completion date 31/12/2022].”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement daily review and documentation of requested blood tests, incorporating the process into ward rounds with contingencies for delays.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A SOP has been developed such that the review of all requested tests for patients are reviewed on a daily basis, supported by good documentation practice in the medical notes. This process has been built into the weekly ward round. Contingencies are in place if the weekly ward round is delayed or does not go ahead.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital Foundation Trust
Page 3 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Oversee delivery of the actions through Quality and Safety Governance Committees, executive oversight and progress reporting to Board subcommittees.

    Stated by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 20 October 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Oversee delivery of the actions through Quality and Safety Governance Committees, executive oversight and progress reporting to Board subcommittees.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The actions either taken or planned in response to the learning from the inquest are summarised below. The oversight of the delivery of these actions will be through our Quality and Safety Governance Committees, with Executive oversight. Sub-Committees of our Boards will receive a progress report.”

Source location

Response from Nottingham University Hospital Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 20 October 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026