PFD report

Ziggy Dylan MITCHELL-STAGG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 17 Dec 2021•Inner North London

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
10

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of a local policy for use of centralised CTG monitoring
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable centralised CTG monitoring systems
  2. Lack of standardised terminology for describing meconium
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable classification and management of meconium during childbirthPart of recurring concern: Unreliable terminology in obstetric delivery guidance and decisions
  3. Inadequate frequency of fresh eyes reviews for women in labour
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely and reliable fresh-eyes reviews in maternity care
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.9

  1. Action

    Update and circulate maternity policies to replace Grade I–III meconium terminology with significant/insignificant terminology.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 December 2021.
  2. Action

    Liaise with neighbouring trusts to understand how they deliver hourly holistic fresh-eyes reviews.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 December 2021.
  3. Action

    Circulate the approved centralised CTG monitoring policy to staff and include it in daily handovers.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 December 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    A true hourly fresh-eyes review was not achievable during the previous trial, limiting immediate implementation of the national guidance.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a local policy for use of centralised CTG monitoring

Wider context from the report

“3. I was told that your trust does not have a local policy regarding the use of centralised CTG monitoring, and it seems that such a policy merits consideration. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable centralised CTG monitoring systems.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of standardised terminology for describing meconium

Wider context from the report

“1. There was not standardisation of the terminology used by the midwives and obstetricians to describe the meconium found, and the information requested by the computer system to record this did not necessarily reflect the verbal descriptions. Sometimes grades I, II & III were used; sometimes significant & insignificant; sometimes thick or thin. There was also inconsistency as to whether grade II was significant, and whether the term significant referred purely to the meconium noted, or to the meconium in the context of other features. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable classification and management of meconium during childbirth; Unreliable terminology in obstetric delivery guidance and decisions.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Inadequate frequency of fresh eyes reviews for women in labour

Wider context from the report

“4. There is national guidance that there should be a fresh eyes review every hour for women in labour, but your trust policy indicates only every two hours. It seems that the trust policy merits reconsideration, either to amend it or to record why there is a departure from national guidance. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely and reliable fresh-eyes reviews in maternity care.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of computer recording fields to reflect verbal descriptions of meconium

Wider context from the report

“1. There was not standardisation of the terminology used by the midwives and obstetricians to describe the meconium found, and the information requested by the computer system to record this did not necessarily reflect the verbal descriptions. Sometimes grades I, II & III were used; sometimes significant & insignificant; sometimes thick or thin. There was also inconsistency as to whether grade II was significant, and whether the term significant referred purely to the meconium noted, or to the meconium in the context of other features. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to document obstetric registrar assessments in the medical records

Wider context from the report

“2. The obstetric registrar attending Ziggy’s mum did not make any note in the medical records after 3.46am, even retrospectively. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update and circulate maternity policies to replace Grade I–III meconium terminology with significant/insignificant terminology.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b) As stated above, the Trust acknowledges that the grading of meconium is not up to date and is inconsistent. We therefore plan to hold a ‘Meconium Awareness Month’ where the following will happen:-”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Liaise with neighbouring trusts to understand how they deliver hourly holistic fresh-eyes reviews.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We agree that our Trust guidance needs revisiting and our first step in that process is to liaise with other neighbouring Trusts of similar acuity to learn from them and understand how they adhere to an hourly fresh eyes which not only assesses fetal well-being but provides a holistic view. We will then create our own action plan for implementation.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate the approved centralised CTG monitoring policy to staff and include it in daily handovers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A Policy has been drafted and has been signed off and approved. This will be circulated via an email to all staff and will be part of the daily handovers.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and approve a local policy for centralised CTG monitoring.

Verbatim wording from the response

“A Policy has been drafted and has been signed off and approved. This will be circulated via an email to all staff and will be part of the daily handovers.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Extend quarterly documentation training delivered by the legal team to doctors, beginning with a session addressing this case.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The obstetric registrar has been spoken to by her relevant manager and it has been agreed that she will attend an external course on documentation. Our in-house legal team provide training to the midwifery team on a monthly basis on the importance of documentation and this training will now be delivered to the doctors on a quarterly basis as well. The legal team will be delivering their first session on the 25th February 2022 where all doctors that cared for Ziggy’s mum will be in attendance and this case will be discussed.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Use daily safety huddles and handovers to remind staff about the revised meconium terminology and related changes.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• daily safety huddles and handovers will ensure that staff are reminded of this change and will be encouraged to take time to review all the changes;”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Create a Trust action plan for implementing an hourly holistic fresh-eyes review after learning from neighbouring trusts.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We agree that our Trust guidance needs revisiting and our first step in that process is to liaise with other neighbouring Trusts of similar acuity to learn from them and understand how they adhere to an hourly fresh eyes which not only assesses fetal well-being but provides a holistic view. We will then create our own action plan for implementation.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement the approved meconium grading-system upgrade, including clinician prompts to record rationale and required escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“a) Our computer system upgrade was already in place before the inquest, and one of the upgrades included updating the meconium grading from Grade I, II & III to the new system of Significant and Insignificant. The Trust has approved this change. A text box will now flash up once significant/insignificant is selected that will allow the clinician to enter the reason why they made that selection and when any onward action/escalation is needed. This change has been finalised and will be implemented by March 2022.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver specific staff training on identifying significant or insignificant meconium and using the new terminology in communication and records.

Verbatim wording from the response

“b) As stated above, the Trust acknowledges that the grading of meconium is not up to date and is inconsistent. We therefore plan to hold a ‘Meconium Awareness Month’ where the following will happen:-”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 1 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

A true hourly fresh-eyes review was not achievable during the previous trial, limiting immediate implementation of the national guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The trust realises that the hourly ‘fresh eyes’ review is embedded within national guidance and we want to strive to achieve this. The trust previously trialled this in 2019 however it was found that a true fresh eyes review was not achievable every hour.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Provide maternity staff with learning from the case through the Practice Development Midwives.

    Stated by Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 22 December 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide maternity staff with learning from the case through the Practice Development Midwives.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• the Practice Development Midwives (PDM’s) will provide learning specifically from this case.”

Source location

2021-0425-Homerton-University-Hospital_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 22 December 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026