PFD report

Jackson J Chadd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 Mar 2014•Surrey

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
5

Raised in this report

Recipients
3

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 3 recipients

Stated actions
18

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised5

  1. Lack of effective supervision of non-career grade paediatricians without previous experience
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to supervise clinicians during clinical work
  2. Lack of independent consultant assessment of paediatric admissions outside normal working hours
    Part of recurring concern: Delays in consultant review of patients
  3. Failure to acknowledge or act on parent concerns
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.10

  1. Action

    Audit implementation of the Fever Guidelines.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  2. Action

    Reiterate the low threshold for acting when a patient or parent is not happy about discharge and provide parental-concern training to paediatric registrars.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  3. Action

    Provide a paediatric consultant responsible for Emergency Department supervision alongside an Emergency Department consultant with paediatric interest.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    The hospital Trust is responsible for addressing local policies, their implementation, staff practice and competence, including parental concerns.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of effective supervision of non-career grade paediatricians without previous experience

Wider context from the report

“1. Lack of effective supervision of a non-career grade paediatrician with no previous experience ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to supervise clinicians during clinical work.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of independent consultant assessment of paediatric admissions outside normal working hours

Wider context from the report

“3. Lack of independent consultant assessment of paediatric admissions into Frimley Park Hospital outside normal working hours ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Delays in consultant review of patients.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to acknowledge or act on parent concerns

Wider context from the report

“5. Failure to acknowledge or act on the concerns of a parent ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of consultant supervision of out-of-hours on-call paediatric trainees

Wider context from the report

“2. Lack of consultant supervision of ‘out of hours’ on-call paediatric trainees ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of effective application of national guidelines for assessment and investigation of fever in children less than one year of age

Wider context from the report

“4. Lack of effective application of national guidelines for assessment and investigation of fever in children less than one year of age ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit implementation of the Fever Guidelines.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The implementation of the Fever Guidelines is to be audited”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Reiterate the low threshold for acting when a patient or parent is not happy about discharge and provide parental-concern training to paediatric registrars.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Paediatric philosophy of ‘patient not happy to go home’ has a low threshold at FPH and has been reiterated to all the junior doctors. The SpRs receive ‘Parental Concern’ as part of their training”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 4 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a paediatric consultant responsible for Emergency Department supervision alongside an Emergency Department consultant with paediatric interest.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• There is a Consultant responsible for Paediatric A&E working alongside an A&E consultant with a Paediatric interest to supervise junior medical staff”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work towards consultant paediatrician review within 14 hours for every acute paediatric admission.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Trust is currently working to 14 hours for a consultant paediatrician review for every child or young person who is admitted to a Paediatric department with an acute medical problem”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider further work to strengthen consultant-delivered paediatric cover towards 24/7 service.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Further work is being considered by the Trust to strengthen a Paediatric Consultant delivered service in moving towards 24/7 cover in line with the Keogh Standards.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Perform blood gases on all children presenting with fever or a non-blanching rash.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Blood gases are to be done on all children presenting with a fever or non-blanching rash”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require paediatric SHOs to notify the consultant when senior review is delayed more than one hour.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• In place at the time of Jackson’s death there was an Escalation Policy whereby if a child was in the A&E Department for more than 3 hours waiting for Paediatric opinion, the Consultant should be informed. The SHO should now notify the Consultant if there is more than an hour delay in senior review of a child.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the consultant-review standard, collate supporting evidence, and consider increasing consultant reviews from once to twice daily within 24 hours.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The ‘Facing the Future’ standards were audited in 2012 by RCPCH for compliance by units across the UK. We found standard 1 was met by 77.4% of units and standard 2 by 87.7%. 99.2% met standard 3. Although this case may have been compliant with our existing standards, our audit report indicated that we were proposing to reconsider standard 2 amongst others with a view to increasing the frequency of consultant review to twice rather than once in 24 hours. This review has now commenced and will take around three months during which we will collate any evidence available to support the recommendations made. In parallel I have discussed this matter with Professor Reid at Health Education England, and as a result our workforce team is working with HEE to model the implications for medical staffing across the country were we to recommend twice daily consultant review.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Audit compliance with the Facing the Future paediatric service standards across UK units.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The ‘Facing the Future’ standards were audited in 2012 by RCPCH for compliance by units across the UK. We found standard 1 was met by 77.4% of units and standard 2 by 87.7%. 99.2% met standard 3. Although this case may have been compliant with our existing standards, our audit report indicated that we were proposing to reconsider standard 2 amongst others with a view to increasing the frequency of consultant review to twice rather than once in 24 hours. This review has now commenced and will take around three months during which we will collate any evidence available to support the recommendations made. In parallel I have discussed this matter with Professor Reid at Health Education England, and as a result our workforce team is working with HEE to model the implications for medical staffing across the country were we to recommend twice daily consultant review.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Model with Health Education England the national medical-staffing implications of recommending twice-daily consultant review.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The ‘Facing the Future’ standards were audited in 2012 by RCPCH for compliance by units across the UK. We found standard 1 was met by 77.4% of units and standard 2 by 87.7%. 99.2% met standard 3. Although this case may have been compliant with our existing standards, our audit report indicated that we were proposing to reconsider standard 2 amongst others with a view to increasing the frequency of consultant review to twice rather than once in 24 hours. This review has now commenced and will take around three months during which we will collate any evidence available to support the recommendations made. In parallel I have discussed this matter with Professor Reid at Health Education England, and as a result our workforce team is working with HEE to model the implications for medical staffing across the country were we to recommend twice daily consultant review.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The hospital Trust is responsible for addressing local policies, their implementation, staff practice and competence, including parental concerns.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Given that we do not have all the details of the case presented the RCPCH is unable to comment on the specifics of the case. We have presumed that the hospital Trust will be responding on local policies and procedures and their implementation relating to the above, and will be reviewing and addressing any issues pertaining to the personal practice and competence of the staff involved.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 1 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The case may have complied with existing paediatric supervision standards, although review of those standards is being undertaken.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The ‘Facing the Future’ standards were audited in 2012 by RCPCH for compliance by units across the UK. We found standard 1 was met by 77.4% of units and standard 2 by 87.7%. 99.2% met standard 3. Although this case may have been compliant with our existing standards, our audit report indicated that we were proposing to reconsider standard 2 amongst others with a view to increasing the frequency of consultant review to twice rather than once in 24 hours. This review has now commenced and will take around three months during which we will collate any evidence available to support the recommendations made. In parallel I have discussed this matter with Professor Reid at Health Education England, and as a result our workforce team is working with HEE to model the implications for medical staffing across the country were we to recommend twice daily consultant review.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.8

  1. 1

    Fast-track children under one year with PEWS below 4 to the Paediatric Assessment Unit.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  2. 2

    Admit all children presenting with a non-blanching rash and consider treatment.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  3. 3

    Update sepsis guidelines to include tachycardia in accordance with 2013 NICE guidance.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  4. 4

    Maintain two middle-grade doctors on duty 24/7 and provide weekday daytime paediatric registrar cover in the Emergency Department.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  5. 5

    Appoint an Emergency Department paediatric consultant.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  6. 6

    Require a blood pressure reading in the PEWS assessment of every child in the Emergency Department.

    Stated by Frimley Health NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  7. 7

    Continue working with the National Children’s Bureau and other partners to press for action to reduce child deaths.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 March 2014.
  8. 8

    Publish a joint report with the National Children’s Bureau examining avoidable child deaths and recommending remedial action.

    Stated by Royal College of Paediatrics and Child HealthStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 March 2014.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Fast-track children under one year with PEWS below 4 to the Paediatric Assessment Unit.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• All children under the age of 1 with a PEWS score of less than 4 are now fast tracked to the Paediatric Assessment Unit based on the Paediatric Ward review”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Admit all children presenting with a non-blanching rash and consider treatment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• All children presenting with a non-blanching rash are to be admitted and treatment considered”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Update sepsis guidelines to include tachycardia in accordance with 2013 NICE guidance.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Sepsis Guidelines have been updated to include tachycardia as per 2013 NICE”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Maintain two middle-grade doctors on duty 24/7 and provide weekday daytime paediatric registrar cover in the Emergency Department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Since the death of Jackson, there are always 2 Middle Grade doctors on duty 24/7 with a Paediatric Registrar available in the Emergency Department 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday to Friday”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint an Emergency Department paediatric consultant.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Since the death of Jackson, a new Emergency Department Paediatric Consultant has been appointed”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 2 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Require a blood pressure reading in the PEWS assessment of every child in the Emergency Department.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• The Emergency Department uses a Paediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) which must now include a blood pressure reading when scoring every child”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Frimley-Park-Hospital
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue working with the National Children’s Bureau and other partners to press for action to reduce child deaths.

Verbatim wording from the response

“RCPCH has a policy priority to focus on reducing child death and we will continue to work with NCB and other partners to press for continued action in this important area.”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 4 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Publish a joint report with the National Children’s Bureau examining avoidable child deaths and recommending remedial action.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Earlier this month RCPCH and NCB launched a joint report ‘Why children die’ http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/index.php?q=child-health/standards-care/health-policy/child-mortality/child-mortality”

Source location

2014-0137-Response-by-Royal-College-of-Paediatrics-Child-Health
Page 3 · response
Published 24 March 2014

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/3

Data last updated 7 September 2026