PFD report

Elise Walsh Deceased · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 22 Aug 2024•Northumberland

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Failure to read and consider patient complaint forms during handling and triage
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints
  2. Failure to make significant patient information available promptly
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable preservation and disclosure of material for death investigations
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Provide clinician support when reception staff raise patient concerns, including clinical review of written material where appropriate.

    Stated by Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 August 2024.
  2. Action

    Redesign incident review templates to carry identified issues and key enquiry lines into full patient safety investigations.

    Stated by Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 August 2024.
  3. Action

    Remind dedicated investigating officers to investigate and address issues raised during incident reviews in completed reports.

    Stated by Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 August 2024.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Immediate opening and triage of complaint forms handed to receptionists cannot be implemented because of confidentiality issues.

    Stated by Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to read and consider patient complaint forms during handling and triage

Wider context from the report

“2. I am told the administrative staff do not read complaint forms and it is the process that complaint forms are placed in an envelope without being read or considered and are sent straight to another hospital. However it appears as part of the triage the envelope containing the complaint form is opened at that hospital by a mixture of administrative staff and clinical staff. I am concerned that important information from a patient could be missed and there could also be a significant delay in administering treatment or intervention. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable handling of safety-related complaints.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to make significant patient information available promptly

Wider context from the report

“1. The deceased attended an appointment at St George’s Park Hospital on the 12 February 2022. After the appointment she was waiting for a taxi, walking up and down the corridor and appeared to be getting more agitated. She was not happy with how her appointment went and voiced those concerns verbally. When the taxi arrived, she refused to get in and the taxi left. She remained at reception where she voiced her anger at the Crisis Team and requested a Complaints Form. I describe it as a note of intent and do not repeat its content. It is not referred to in any witness statements, it is not referred to in the Serious Incident Investigation. I had it was discussed at the After Action Review but it has not made its way through to the Serious Incident Investigation. It was disclosed to my office on Friday 16 August 2024 and of greater concern the family were not aware of its existence. I am concerned this significant information was not made available much earlier. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable preservation and disclosure of material for death investigations.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide clinician support when reception staff raise patient concerns, including clinical review of written material where appropriate.

Verbatim wording from the response

“explained at the Inquest, the Trust have however, implemented a system whereby if reception staff have concerns about a patient, they can call for support and a clinician will attend to support the reception staff until such concerns are resolved. If during this period of support the patient writes things down, then clinicians can make a decision as to whether or not it is appropriate to review what they have written, enabling them to act upon the contents if indicated.”

Source location

Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Page 2 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Redesign incident review templates to carry identified issues and key enquiry lines into full patient safety investigations.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust now carry out internal investigations in accordance with PSIRF (Patient Safety Incident Response Framework). In line with PSIRF CNTW's review templates have been redesigned to ensure that identified issues/key lines of enquiry are carried forward and are not lost when a review progresses to a full Patient Safety Incident Investigation. Following on from the Inquest the Head of Clinical Risk and Investigations has spoken with the Trust's dedicated Investigating Officers to remind them that whenever an issue is raised as part of discussion during an incident review process it is then explored further and addressed in the completed report.”

Source location

Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Remind dedicated investigating officers to investigate and address issues raised during incident reviews in completed reports.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust now carry out internal investigations in accordance with PSIRF (Patient Safety Incident Response Framework). In line with PSIRF CNTW's review templates have been redesigned to ensure that identified issues/key lines of enquiry are carried forward and are not lost when a review progresses to a full Patient Safety Incident Investigation. Following on from the Inquest the Head of Clinical Risk and Investigations has spoken with the Trust's dedicated Investigating Officers to remind them that whenever an issue is raised as part of discussion during an incident review process it is then explored further and addressed in the completed report.”

Source location

Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Immediate opening and triage of complaint forms handed to receptionists cannot be implemented because of confidentiality issues.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As you heard at the Inquest, owing to confidentiality issues it is unfortunately not possible to implement a process across the Trust, whereby any complaint forms which are handed to receptionists are opened and immediately triaged. Following the inquest this matter has been discussed at the Trust Wide Patient Safety Learning and Improvement Panel (PSLIP) and unfortunately it has not been possible to identify a different system which would allow for such urgent reviews, however the PSLIP panel did request the above addition to the complaints form. As”

Source location

Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Add urgent-contact guidance to complaint forms and communicate the change to Trust staff through a safety alert.

    Stated by Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 August 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Add urgent-contact guidance to complaint forms and communicate the change to Trust staff through a safety alert.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Following the Inquest the Trust have added a note to the complaints form that reads, Please be aware your complaint/concern will not be reviewed until it reaches the centralised complaints department. If you need to speak to someone more urgently then please inform a member of staff or call our crisis team on either 111 (selecting option 2) or 0191 814 8899. This change has been communicated to all Trust staff via a CAS (safety) alert.”

Source location

Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
Page 1 · response
Published 30 August 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026