PFD report

Jack Dulson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Aug 2014•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Lack of timely review of abnormal blood test results
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
  2. Failure to provide treatment after abnormal blood test results
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
  3. Failure to review the patient after abnormal blood test results
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of timely review of abnormal blood test results

Wider context from the report

“(1) The GP practice had no system in place to review abnormal blood test results when they were received and to then review the patient and provide treatment. (2) The abnormal blood tests were only reviewed when the family arranged and insisted on an appointment – this was over 24 hours after the tests results were available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide treatment after abnormal blood test results

Wider context from the report

“(1) The GP practice had no system in place to review abnormal blood test results when they were received and to then review the patient and provide treatment. (2) The abnormal blood tests were only reviewed when the family arranged and insisted on an appointment – this was over 24 hours after the tests results were available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to review the patient after abnormal blood test results

Wider context from the report

“(1) The GP practice had no system in place to review abnormal blood test results when they were received and to then review the patient and provide treatment. (2) The abnormal blood tests were only reviewed when the family arranged and insisted on an appointment – this was over 24 hours after the tests results were available. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.