PFD report

Peter Jason FANNING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 7 May 2024•Birmingham and Solihull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
4

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Insufficient availability of feeding-tube replacement services for patients with complex needs
  2. Failure to maintain nutrition after feeding-tube dislodgement
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Action

    Increase interventional radiology capacity to four weekly lists across three sites and provide three consultants for x-ray-guided feeding-tube insertion.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  2. Action

    Provide a temporary additional interventional radiology theatre at Heartlands for two days per week using additional funding.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 14 May 2024.
  3. Action

    Consider a business case to make the additional Heartlands interventional radiology theatre provision full time.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Insufficient availability of feeding-tube replacement services for patients with complex needs

Wider context from the report

“1. The inquest heard evidence that there is only one radiology list per week to accommodate replacement of feeding tubes in patients with complex needs. In Peter’s case this meant he had to wait a week for the tube to be replaced meaning he had suboptimal nutrition during this period. Consideration should be given to whether additional services are required for replacement of feeding tubes in patients with complex needs. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to maintain nutrition after feeding-tube dislodgement

Wider context from the report

“2. The inquest heard evidence that Peter’s nutritional status was suboptimal due to repeated tube dislodgments and waiting for radiology or theatre slots to be available. Consideration needs to be given as to how best to maintain patients’ nutrition after tube dislodgments when they rely on feeding tubes. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Increase interventional radiology capacity to four weekly lists across three sites and provide three consultants for x-ray-guided feeding-tube insertion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“X-ray guided tube insertion The Interventional Radiology department has increased capacity from one to four intervention radiology (IR) lists per week across our Heartland’s, Good Hope and Solihull Hospital sites (HGS), which can accommodate x-ray guided feeding tube insertions. We also now have three IR consultants who are able to provide this service (increased from one previously) and these changes have been in place since April 2024.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide a temporary additional interventional radiology theatre at Heartlands for two days per week using additional funding.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Also, temporary funding has been made available to increase IR capacity on the Heartlands site and we have an additional IR theatre running in the Heartlands Treatment Centre for two days per week. A business case is currently being considered to support this becoming a full-time provision.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Consider a business case to make the additional Heartlands interventional radiology theatre provision full time.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Also, temporary funding has been made available to increase IR capacity on the Heartlands site and we have an additional IR theatre running in the Heartlands Treatment Centre for two days per week. A business case is currently being considered to support this becoming a full-time provision.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham
Page 1 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Review the service for patients requiring general anaesthesia, including consideration of increasing Heartlands provision.

    Stated by University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 14 May 2024.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Review the service for patients requiring general anaesthesia, including consideration of increasing Heartlands provision.

Verbatim wording from the response

“We are currently reviewing our service where general anaesthetic is required and this includes consideration of increasing this provision on our Heartlands site to enable us to better meet the needs of our more complex patients in a more timely manner.”

Source location

Response from University Hospitals Birmingham
Page 2 · response
Published 14 May 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026