PFD report

KIRSTY ELIZABETH TOLLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 9 May 2018•Norfolk

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
3

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
5

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised3

  1. Failure to escalate EWS scores of 3 for medical review and increased observations
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patientsPart of recurring concern: Failure to reliably communicate clinically significant patient observations to medical staffPart of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration
  2. Failure to assess and record Early Warning Scores three times per day
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration
  3. Failure to carry out daily blood tests to monitor haemoglobin levels
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to ensure reliable renal monitoring for patients with renal disease
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.4

  1. Action

    Conduct ongoing audits of NEWS2 documentation and escalation.

    Stated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King'S Lynn, NHS Foundation TrustStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  2. Action

    Appoint a NEWS2 Champion.

    Stated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King'S Lynn, NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.
  3. Action

    Provide staff with support to understand and use the current escalation system.

    Stated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King'S Lynn, NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.2

  1. Position

    Widespread retraining on older escalation procedures will not occur before NEWS2 implementation because it could cause confusion.

    Stated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King'S Lynn, NHS Foundation TrustUnable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to escalate EWS scores of 3 for medical review and increased observations

Wider context from the report

“(3) Evidence was heard that if EWS reaches 3, then this should be escalated to a doctor who should review the patient and set a plan. Observations should be increased to 4 times per hour with further review. The EWS reached 3 on 4 occasions (including the occasion when the EWS was not completed in the records – 17 February) and there is no evidence that any additional action was taken. In particular on the 17 February no observations/EWS for over 17 hours. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to provide timely medical review of admitted patients; Failure to reliably communicate clinically significant patient observations to medical staff; Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to assess and record Early Warning Scores three times per day

Wider context from the report

“(2) Early Warning Scores (EWS) are required to be assessed and recorded 3 times per day. This was not done at lunchtime on 11 February nor evening time on 17 February 2017. No reason has been given for this. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable clinical Early Warning Score systems for deterioration.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to carry out daily blood tests to monitor haemoglobin levels

Wider context from the report

“(1) Miss Tolley had a history of anaemia and had received a blood transfusion in 2016. On admission the Care Plan required blood tests to be taken daily to check haemoglobin levels. These were carried out on 10th, 13th, 14th and 16th (not daily) and showed decreasing levels. Ferinject was administered on 16th February. No blood tests to check haemoglobin levels were carried out after that date (except whilst in cardiac arrest). Blood tests were not carried out daily as required in the Care Plan, despite the requirement for monitoring, her history, the decreasing level of haemoglobin, and Ferinject being administered. There is no reason given in the Care Plan. Evidence was heard with regard to a Regulation 28 Report, that haemoglobin levels are not checked in the few days after Ferinject is administered as its effect is not seen straight away. This was not raised as a reason for not carrying out blood tests in evidence at the inquest. This was not recorded as a reason in the medical records. Sadly, not only did this not give treating Doctors a picture of Miss Tolley's anaemia during her lifetime but has also meant there is a vacuum of evidence with regard to the medical cause of death. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to ensure reliable renal monitoring for patients with renal disease.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Conduct ongoing audits of NEWS2 documentation and escalation.

Verbatim wording from the response

“This will be followed by an ongoing audit to ensure appropriate documentation and audit of escalation.”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Appoint a NEWS2 Champion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“May 16 Appointment of NEWS2 Champion”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Provide staff with support to understand and use the current escalation system.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The staff, both nursing and medical, working in that clinical area have received support to ensure that they understand and are able to use the current escalation system.”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Implement NEWS2 with new documentation, training and escalation procedures, supported by communications and a November 2018 go-live.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has therefore decided to bring forward plans to adopt the National Early Warning system (NEWS2) that is mandated across the NHS from April 2019 and will implement this on November 1st 2018.”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Widespread retraining on older escalation procedures will not occur before NEWS2 implementation because it could cause confusion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Trust has therefore decided to bring forward plans to adopt the National Early Warning system (NEWS2) that is mandated across the NHS from April 2019 and will implement this on November 1st 2018.”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Medical plans may appropriately change without formally addressing each earlier entry unless there is a serious reason to question the initial opinion.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Upon the patient’s admission the admitting consultant, ████████, wrote in his management plan that Kirsty was to have daily bloods. That plan clearly varied subsequently but his initial plan was based upon his clinical assessment at the time. I think it important to note that our admission document (Clerking Proforma) is not regarded as a rigid tool, perhaps as is seen with documentation like the Waterlow assessment or falls risk tools, for example. From the medical point of view the plan may, and should, change as different doctors subsequently review the patient and or the condition or working diagnoses change. In fact I would expect subsequent doctors visiting a patient always to have in mind an inquisitive and challenging approach to initial working diagnoses and management plans, and be prepared to alter them.”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 1 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Form a NEWS2 Implementation Group reporting to the Trust Clinical Governance Committee.

    Stated by the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King'S Lynn, NHS Foundation TrustStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 1 July 2018.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Form a NEWS2 Implementation Group reporting to the Trust Clinical Governance Committee.

Verbatim wording from the response

“June 11 NEWS2 Implementation Group formed with reporting to Trust Clinical Governance Committee”

Source location

2018-0139-Response-by-Queens-Elizabeth-Hospital-Kings-Lynn
Page 2 · response
Published 1 July 2018

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026