PFD report

Mrs Elizabeth Glen Self · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 29 Oct 2019•South Yorkshire (Western)

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
2

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Lack of necessary training for senior staff making x-ray requests
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable X-ray request and progression processes
  2. Failure of systems to ensure timely resolution of x-ray and CT requests
    Part of recurring concern: Unreliable CT scan request and escalation processesPart of recurring concern: Unreliable X-ray request and progression processes
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of necessary training for senior staff making x-ray requests

Wider context from the report

“a) A moderately senior doctor had put in not one but two x-ray requests that had to be rejected which is suggestive of a lack of necessary training b) A valid CT request had laid unattended for a full morning, the reasons for which were never established but the hospitals own investigation report team formed an impression of a breakdown in communications. c) The overall circumstances were such that neither requests was actually completed until more than thirteen hours after what was a significant fall. The inquest found this to be a criticism of the system then in place rather than of particular individuals. In essence my concern is that those inspecting hospitals in other places should include in their programme establishing that senior staff do actually know how to make a proper x-ray request which will not therefore be rejected and checking systems to ensure that x-ray and CT requests cannot go for a period of hours without resolution. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable X-ray request and progression processes.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of systems to ensure timely resolution of x-ray and CT requests

Wider context from the report

“a) A moderately senior doctor had put in not one but two x-ray requests that had to be rejected which is suggestive of a lack of necessary training b) A valid CT request had laid unattended for a full morning, the reasons for which were never established but the hospitals own investigation report team formed an impression of a breakdown in communications. c) The overall circumstances were such that neither requests was actually completed until more than thirteen hours after what was a significant fall. The inquest found this to be a criticism of the system then in place rather than of particular individuals. In essence my concern is that those inspecting hospitals in other places should include in their programme establishing that senior staff do actually know how to make a proper x-ray request which will not therefore be rejected and checking systems to ensure that x-ray and CT requests cannot go for a period of hours without resolution. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable CT scan request and escalation processes; Unreliable X-ray request and progression processes.

Open source report

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Disseminate this matter and its learning through quality structures across England.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 17 February 2019.
  2. 2

    Work with hospitals through the seven-day services programme to improve care standards, including access to appropriate diagnostic imaging.

    Stated by NHS EnglandStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 17 February 2019.

Recipient positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when they do not describe a specific action.1

  1. 1

    Hospital inspection and associated assurance are undertaken by the independent CQC, so NHS England cannot require its response.

    Stated by NHS EnglandRedirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Disseminate this matter and its learning through quality structures across England.

Verbatim wording from the response

“NHS England and Improvement has responsibility for quality oversight and assurance and I will ensure this matter and the learning that can be taken from it is disseminated through the quality structures across England.”

Source location

2018-0308-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 17 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Work with hospitals through the seven-day services programme to improve care standards, including access to appropriate diagnostic imaging.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Inspection of hospitals is undertaken by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and I note they have received a copy of the notice. The CQC’s regulatory function is independent of NHS England/Improvement, so I am not in a position to require a response from them in relation to this matter. NHS England/Improvement have however been working with hospitals to improve standards of care provided to patients under the 7 day services programme. This includes ready access to appropriate diagnostic imaging which would be relevant to this case. Further details of this programme can be found at https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/seven-day-services/#h2-the-four-priority-standards.”

Source location

2018-0308-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 17 February 2019

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Hospital inspection and associated assurance are undertaken by the independent CQC, so NHS England cannot require its response.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Inspection of hospitals is undertaken by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and I note they have received a copy of the notice. The CQC’s regulatory function is independent of NHS England/Improvement, so I am not in a position to require a response from them in relation to this matter. NHS England/Improvement have however been working with hospitals to improve standards of care provided to patients under the 7 day services programme. This includes ready access to appropriate diagnostic imaging which would be relevant to this case. Further details of this programme can be found at https://improvement.nhs.uk/resources/seven-day-services/#h2-the-four-priority-standards.”

Source location

2018-0308-Response-by-NHS-England
Page 1 · response
Published 17 February 2019

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026