PFD report

Helen Louise MILLARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 6 Oct 2016•East Riding and Hull

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
0

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
0

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to classify all identified ligature points as extreme risks requiring urgent elimination
    Part of recurring concern: Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

No linked response statements

No respondent-stated action or position is clearly linked to these concerns.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to classify all identified ligature points as extreme risks requiring urgent elimination

Wider context from the report

“Evidence was heard that NHS England is undertaking an ongoing programme of work to eliminate ligature points in in-patient and other psychiatric facilities. It was established that a ‘traffic light’ system is in operation which prioritises the work once a ligature point has been identified in any particular facility. The Court heard that if a point is scored ‘red’ this equates with an extreme risk and mandates urgent elimination of the point. If, however, a risk is categorised as ‘amber’ this nevertheless represents a high risk. The classification according to this traffic light system is based upon the height of the ligature point from the ground. If a ligature point is one metre or less it is categorised as being ‘amber’, whereas if it is over one metre above the ground it is categorised as ‘red’. Expert evidence was adduced from a number of expert witnesses and Consultant Psychiatrists that at least 50% of deaths due to hanging in inpatient psychiatric facilities occur from ligature points which are one metre or less in height above the ground. Patients merely need to learn forward and tighten the ligature around their neck under their body weight and they collapse into unconsciousness within ten to twenty seconds and death can occur in as little as two to three minutes. This evidence was backed up by peer reviewed literature which was also read out during the course of the Inquest. My principal concern is that there is an obvious incongruity in the classification system as effectively all ligature points, no matter what their height, should be regarded as representing extreme risks. Evidence was heard that the risk is independent of height and consideration needs to be given to classifying all ligature points once identified as ‘red’ and their elimination tackled on an urgent basis. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Failure to control ligature risks in inpatient and custodial environments.

Open source report
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
0/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026

No official response is included in the current published snapshot.