PFD report

Brandon James Pryde and David Ernest Faulkner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 12 Aug 2022•Manchester South

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
4

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
21

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised4

  1. Failure to verify transfer of Command and Control between police supervisors
  2. Failure of GMP Force Duty Supervisors to recognise their authority to perform Command and Control on the motorway network
  3. Failure of the Command and Control protocol to operate effectively throughout pursuits
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.18

  1. Action

    Design accreditation, retraining and continuing professional development for personnel involved in pursuit management.

    Stated by Greater Manchester PoliceStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  2. Action

    Revise the managing pursuits protocol to clarify command and control responsibilities for pursuits, including cross-border pursuits.

    Stated by Greater Manchester PoliceStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  3. Action

    Deliver the devised one-day initial pursuit course to supervisors and operators managing initial-phase pursuits.

    Stated by Greater Manchester PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.3

  1. Position

    The omission to establish formal command and control did not contribute to the deaths, and failures to take command are not common.

    Stated by Greater Manchester PoliceDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to verify transfer of Command and Control between police supervisors

Wider context from the report

“I received evidence in both inquests that there is a Protocol between GMP and NWMPG (which is based at the Cheshire Constabulary) dated June 2015 in accordance with the College of Police Authorised Professional Practice for Police Pursuits, for the Command and Control of pursuits. That Protocol is intended to provide a mechanism for Command and Control to be undertaken and transferred between GMP and NWMPG when pursuits move between the normal road network and the motorway network, so that Command and Control is maintained throughout. The Supervising Officer in the control room has the authority to direct that a pursuit be discontinued if they assess that it is right to do so, having regard to all of the circumstances which are known to them, which may include information not immediately available to the police officer(s) involved in the pursuit. Although I found that the absence of any control-room Command and Control had not contributed to either death in this case, the following matters gave rise to concern, having regard to the inherent risk of pursuits, which are likely to move between ordinary road and motorway networks in the Greater Manchester area; (1) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor assumed that the NWMPG Supervisor had taken Command and Control when they had not done so; (2) The NWMPG Supervisor did not communicate whether they had taken Command and Control clearly; (3) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor did not consider that they had any authority to perform Command and Control of the pursuit once it had entered the motorway network; and (4) The Protocol did not operate in practice so that there was no effective Command and Control at any point during the pursuit. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of GMP Force Duty Supervisors to recognise their authority to perform Command and Control on the motorway network

Wider context from the report

“I received evidence in both inquests that there is a Protocol between GMP and NWMPG (which is based at the Cheshire Constabulary) dated June 2015 in accordance with the College of Police Authorised Professional Practice for Police Pursuits, for the Command and Control of pursuits. That Protocol is intended to provide a mechanism for Command and Control to be undertaken and transferred between GMP and NWMPG when pursuits move between the normal road network and the motorway network, so that Command and Control is maintained throughout. The Supervising Officer in the control room has the authority to direct that a pursuit be discontinued if they assess that it is right to do so, having regard to all of the circumstances which are known to them, which may include information not immediately available to the police officer(s) involved in the pursuit. Although I found that the absence of any control-room Command and Control had not contributed to either death in this case, the following matters gave rise to concern, having regard to the inherent risk of pursuits, which are likely to move between ordinary road and motorway networks in the Greater Manchester area; (1) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor assumed that the NWMPG Supervisor had taken Command and Control when they had not done so; (2) The NWMPG Supervisor did not communicate whether they had taken Command and Control clearly; (3) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor did not consider that they had any authority to perform Command and Control of the pursuit once it had entered the motorway network; and (4) The Protocol did not operate in practice so that there was no effective Command and Control at any point during the pursuit. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure of the Command and Control protocol to operate effectively throughout pursuits

Wider context from the report

“I received evidence in both inquests that there is a Protocol between GMP and NWMPG (which is based at the Cheshire Constabulary) dated June 2015 in accordance with the College of Police Authorised Professional Practice for Police Pursuits, for the Command and Control of pursuits. That Protocol is intended to provide a mechanism for Command and Control to be undertaken and transferred between GMP and NWMPG when pursuits move between the normal road network and the motorway network, so that Command and Control is maintained throughout. The Supervising Officer in the control room has the authority to direct that a pursuit be discontinued if they assess that it is right to do so, having regard to all of the circumstances which are known to them, which may include information not immediately available to the police officer(s) involved in the pursuit. Although I found that the absence of any control-room Command and Control had not contributed to either death in this case, the following matters gave rise to concern, having regard to the inherent risk of pursuits, which are likely to move between ordinary road and motorway networks in the Greater Manchester area; (1) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor assumed that the NWMPG Supervisor had taken Command and Control when they had not done so; (2) The NWMPG Supervisor did not communicate whether they had taken Command and Control clearly; (3) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor did not consider that they had any authority to perform Command and Control of the pursuit once it had entered the motorway network; and (4) The Protocol did not operate in practice so that there was no effective Command and Control at any point during the pursuit. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to communicate clearly whether Command and Control has been taken

Wider context from the report

“I received evidence in both inquests that there is a Protocol between GMP and NWMPG (which is based at the Cheshire Constabulary) dated June 2015 in accordance with the College of Police Authorised Professional Practice for Police Pursuits, for the Command and Control of pursuits. That Protocol is intended to provide a mechanism for Command and Control to be undertaken and transferred between GMP and NWMPG when pursuits move between the normal road network and the motorway network, so that Command and Control is maintained throughout. The Supervising Officer in the control room has the authority to direct that a pursuit be discontinued if they assess that it is right to do so, having regard to all of the circumstances which are known to them, which may include information not immediately available to the police officer(s) involved in the pursuit. Although I found that the absence of any control-room Command and Control had not contributed to either death in this case, the following matters gave rise to concern, having regard to the inherent risk of pursuits, which are likely to move between ordinary road and motorway networks in the Greater Manchester area; (1) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor assumed that the NWMPG Supervisor had taken Command and Control when they had not done so; (2) The NWMPG Supervisor did not communicate whether they had taken Command and Control clearly; (3) The GMP Force Duty Supervisor did not consider that they had any authority to perform Command and Control of the pursuit once it had entered the motorway network; and (4) The Protocol did not operate in practice so that there was no effective Command and Control at any point during the pursuit. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design accreditation, retraining and continuing professional development for personnel involved in pursuit management.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Accreditation, re-training and Continuous Professional Development (CPD) are in design and final details will be confirmed through the working group.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the managing pursuits protocol to clarify command and control responsibilities for pursuits, including cross-border pursuits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this tragic incident GMP and Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all GMP control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver the devised one-day initial pursuit course to supervisors and operators managing initial-phase pursuits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“GMP have committed to further training for all those who may be involved in the command and control of police pursuits. It was identified that whilst drivers had received significant investment over recent years this had not been the case for officers and staff engaged on the command-and-control element of pursuit management.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate the revised managing pursuits protocol to all GMP control room staff involved in managing police pursuits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this tragic incident GMP and Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all GMP control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete design and deliver a four-day tactical-phase commanders’ course to Force Duty Officers and Assistant Force Duty Officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A 4-day tactical phase commanders’ course is in the final stages of design by the Driver Training Unit and Command Training (Specialist Operations). This will be delivered to the 8 Force Duty Officers (FDO) and 7 Assistant Force Duty Officers (AFDO) within GMP. This will enable a policy change with the authorisation of pursuits moving from the Force Duty Supervisor to the FDO/AFDO role. A training schedule is being drawn up and delivery anticipated within the next 6 months.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Establish and operate a Pursuit Management Working Group to review and redevelop training for pursuit dispatch operators and commanders.

Verbatim wording from the response

“GMP have committed to further training for all those who may be involved in the command and control of police pursuits. It was identified that whilst drivers had received significant investment over recent years this had not been the case for officers and staff engaged on the command-and-control element of pursuit management.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise and clarify the managing pursuits protocol to remove ambiguity about command and control.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this tragic incident GMP and Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all GMP control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete design and deliver a four-day tactical-phase commanders’ course for GMP force duty and assistant force duty officers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A 4-day tactical phase commanders’ course is in the final stages of design by the Driver Training Unit and Command Training (Specialist Operations). This will be delivered to the 8 Force Duty Officers (FDO) and 7 Assistant Force Duty Officers (AFDO) within GMP. This will enable a policy change with the authorisation of pursuits moving from the Force Duty Supervisor to the FDO/AFDO role. A training schedule is being drawn up and delivery anticipated within the next 6 months.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Develop and deliver a one-day initial pursuit course for supervisors and operators managing initial-phase pursuits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A 1-day initial pursuit course has been devised by the Driver Training Unit. This will be delivered to Supervisors and operators involved in the management of initial phase pursuit and will align with training provided to Police drivers who have completed the Initial Pursuit course (IPP). A training schedule is being drawn up now for delivery anticipated to be completed within the next 6-9 months due to high numbers requiring training.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design accreditation, retraining and continuing professional development for pursuit management staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Accreditation, re-training and Continuous Professional Development (CPD) are in design and final details will be confirmed through the working group.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate the revised managing pursuits protocol to GMP control-room staff involved in managing police pursuits.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of this tragic incident GMP and Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all GMP control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design and deliver training for Team 3 dispatch operators managing specialist resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Training for Team 3 dispatch operators – those managing specialist resources – is being designed. Delivery of this is planned to take place within the next 6-9 months.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver command-protocol training for cross-border pursuits and track rollout through bi-monthly governance meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Constabulary acting as lead force on behalf of the collaborative forces is committed to ensuring continuous professional development and training for all staff within the regional control centre.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate the revised managing-pursuits protocol to all relevant NWMPG control-room staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) and GMP have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all NWMPG control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the managing-pursuits protocol to clarify command-and-control responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) and GMP have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all NWMPG control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Deliver command-protocol training for cross-border pursuits and track its rollout through governance meetings.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Constabulary acting as lead force on behalf of the collaborative forces is committed to ensuring continuous professional development and training for all staff within the regional control centre.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Revise the managing-pursuits protocol to clarify command-and-control responsibilities.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) and GMP have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all NWMPG control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Circulate the revised managing-pursuits protocol to relevant NWMPG control-room staff.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Police (on behalf of the NWMPG) and GMP have revised the managing pursuits protocol and produced a clearer document which removes the previous ambiguity on the issue of Command and Control. This document will be circulated to all NWMPG control room staff involved in the management of police pursuits.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The omission to establish formal command and control did not contribute to the deaths, and failures to take command are not common.

Verbatim wording from the response

“GMP agree with the coroners findings that this omission did not contribute to the outcome and observe that, having reviewed similar pursuits, that failure to take command and control is not a common issue.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The absence of formal pursuit command and control did not contribute to the outcome, and such failures are not common.

Verbatim wording from the response

“GMP agree with the coroners findings that this omission did not contribute to the outcome and observe that, having reviewed similar pursuits, that failure to take command and control is not a common issue.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Command and control remains with the originating authority until an appropriate handover, rather than automatically transferring to NWMPG.

Verbatim wording from the response

“If a pursuit moves from one command area to another, or the pursuit commences on a different command area to which the communication platform is aligned then communications links will be established between the respective control rooms, but the command and control will remain with the originating authority until such a point in time as is deemed appropriate by the respective control room supervisors to hand over command and control.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 1 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. 1

    Design and deliver training for Team 3 dispatch operators managing specialist resources.

    Stated by Greater Manchester PoliceStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  2. 2

    Monitor and share feedback from GMP’s pursuit-management training package, and disseminate resulting best practice across the collaboration.

    Stated by North West Motorway Patrol GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.
  3. 3

    Monitor GMP pursuit-management training, share feedback, and disseminate best practice across the collaboration.

    Stated by North West Motorway Patrol GroupStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 30 September 2022.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Design and deliver training for Team 3 dispatch operators managing specialist resources.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• Training for Team 3 dispatch operators – those managing specialist resources – is being designed. Delivery of this is planned to take place within the next 6–9 months.”

Source location

Response from Greater Manchester Police
Page 3 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor and share feedback from GMP’s pursuit-management training package, and disseminate resulting best practice across the collaboration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Constabulary are aware of the enhanced training package by GMP pursuit management working group. As part of the strategic oversight the governance board of the NWMPG will monitor and share feedback from GMP training package and disseminate best practice throughout the collaboration.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Monitor GMP pursuit-management training, share feedback, and disseminate best practice across the collaboration.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Cheshire Constabulary are aware of the enhanced training package by GMP pursuit management working group. As part of the strategic oversight the governance board of the NWMPG will monitor and share feedback from GMP training package and disseminate best practice throughout the collaboration.”

Source location

Response from Cheshire Constabulary
Page 2 · response
Published 30 September 2022

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026