Guy Douglas Scotcheford · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 31 Jan 2024•Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

Published report and response evidence

This report’s concerns and statements found in recipients’ published responses. Statements are included even where no link to an individual concern is recorded. A link shows an evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
2

Raised in this report

Recipients
2

Named on the report

Responses found
2

Of 2 recipients

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised2

  1. Online facilitation of UK home delivery of equipment for ending life
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate controls on access to online suicide-promoting content
  2. Public availability of step-by-step online instructions for ending life

Stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.3

  1. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

    Raise nitrogen-related concerns with the Concerning Methods Working Group and suggest engaging UK sellers to minimise harm.

  2. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

    Continue reviewing online safety policy and identify opportunities to build on the Online Safety Act.

  3. National Crime Agency

    Engage with Ofcom to scope how the NCA and Ofcom can work together within their respective roles to combat suicide content online.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.4

  1. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

    The Online Safety Act does not permit preventing adults from accessing legal suicide or self-harm content.

    Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
  2. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

    Police investigations, CPS prosecution decisions and courts determine whether authors or distributors have committed an offence.

    Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
  3. Department for Science, Innovation and Technology

    Enforcement of existing suicide-related offences falls outside the government's functions.

    Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
  4. National Crime Agency

    The sale of nitrogen and other inert gases is not prohibited because they have many legitimate industrial and commercial uses.

    Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Online facilitation of UK home delivery of equipment for ending life

Wider context from the report

“It was clear from the evidence of the investigating officer that the website (████████) is still active and from this website a████████████████████████████████" can be downloaded. This document gives a direct link to a company from which ████████ can be purchased in the UK and home delivered. The police investigation determined that this named company did receive and supply that order. The downloaded document provides step by step instruction on how to end your life with specific advice and direction on the use of certain equipment. The investigating officer made a recent internet search of this website which states that it provides practical DIY information to enable readers to take control over their own life and death. This website is available to anyone to access online. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate controls on access to online suicide-promoting content.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Public availability of step-by-step online instructions for ending life

Wider context from the report

“It was clear from the evidence of the investigating officer that the website (████████) is still active and from this website a████████████████████████████████" can be downloaded. This document gives a direct link to a company from which ████████ can be purchased in the UK and home delivered. The police investigation determined that this named company did receive and supply that order. The downloaded document provides step by step instruction on how to end your life with specific advice and direction on the use of certain equipment. The investigating officer made a recent internet search of this website which states that it provides practical DIY information to enable readers to take control over their own life and death. This website is available to anyone to access online. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

No recurring-concern membership is currently published.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Raise nitrogen-related concerns with the Concerning Methods Working Group and suggest engaging UK sellers to minimise harm.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As leaders of the Suicide Prevention Strategy, officials from the Department for Health & Social Care (DHSC) lead a Concerning Methods Working Group to raise awareness of and tackle access to emerging methods of suicide. Deaths using nitrogen are monitored routinely as part of this. The working group involves representatives from the voluntary community and social enterprise sector, police, academics and the NHS, as well as government departments including Department of Science, Innovation and Technology. DSIT officials will raise the concerns in your letter around Nitrogen with this group and suggest that engagement with UK sellers is undertaken to raise awareness of and minimise the risk of harm to individuals.”

Source location

Response from Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Page 3 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue reviewing online safety policy and identify opportunities to build on the Online Safety Act.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I would like to thank you again for drawing this to my attention and I hope that this response is useful in setting out where the Online Safety Act will offer significant new protections against illegal content for all users. The government will continue to keep online safety policy under review and identify areas where we can build on the Act, so it is important for me to be made aware of online safety related Reports to Prevent Future Deaths.”

Source location

Response from Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Page 3 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Engage with Ofcom to scope how the NCA and Ofcom can work together within their respective roles to combat suicide content online.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As a result of your letter we have been engaging with Ofcom, the online safety regulator under the Online Safety Act 2023, to scope out how we can work effectively together, within our respective roles, to combat suicide content online. The NCA understands that Ofcom is in the process of consulting on its draft codes of practice and guidance that will explain the steps that regulated online services will need to take to meet their legal duties under the Act to protect their users in the UK from this sort of content.”

Source location

Response from National Crime Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The Online Safety Act does not permit preventing adults from accessing legal suicide or self-harm content.

Verbatim wording from the response

“As previously explained, the Online Safety Act does not prevent adult users from accessing legal suicide and self-harm content. In some cases, such content may be trying to provide support to those in need and this is therefore a complicated area to regulate. To be clear, I am not saying that ████████ is such a book.”

Source location

Response from Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Police investigations, CPS prosecution decisions and courts determine whether authors or distributors have committed an offence.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Whether a prosecution for encouraging or assisting suicide can be brought is a matter for the Crown Prosecution Service following a police investigation. The CPS policy on assisted suicide¹ sets out the factors which prosecutors in England and Wales will consider, in addition to those already outlined in the Code for Crown Prosecutors, when deciding whether it is in the public interest to prosecute in cases of encouraging or assisting suicide.”

Source location

Response from Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Enforcement of existing suicide-related offences falls outside the government's functions.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The issue therefore is whether the authors or distributors of ████████ or similar books are committing an offence. However, the enforcement of existing offences is not for the government, but for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service and it is ultimately for the courts to decide if an offence has been committed. As you are aware, relevant criminal offences have a high threshold to avoid criminalising people who are expressing suicidal feelings and those offering them”

Source location

Response from Department for Science, Innovation & Technology
Page 2 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

The sale of nitrogen and other inert gases is not prohibited because they have many legitimate industrial and commercial uses.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The NCA recognise that the sale of nitrogen and other inert gasses is not in itself prohibited due to their many uses, primarily in industry, which include within hydraulic systems, cooling applications, creation of various beverages, and food packaging. The Health and Safety Executive sets out and enforces regulations in respect of the safety standards of gas canisters but this does not extend to who can purchase the canisters.”

Source location

Response from National Crime Agency
Page 1 · response
Published 12 February 2024

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
2/2

Data last updated 7 September 2026