PFD report

Wilfred Roy Breakell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 20 May 2021•County of Dorset

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
3

Described in responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Lack of a barrier between the highway and the storm drain
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate roadside vehicle-restraint barriers
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. Action

    Install permanent timber post-and-rail fencing beside the slip road and storm drain.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 May 2021.

Respondent positions A position is what a recipient says about a concern when it does not describe a specific action.1

  1. Position

    Additional fencing is not appropriate because recurrence risk is low and the fencing could cause more injuries than it prevents.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilDisputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Lack of a barrier between the highway and the storm drain

Wider context from the report

“Although there is now wooden fencing that runs from the end of the paved footpath in a northerly direction (adjacent to the pedestrian crossing), there is still no barrier between the highway and the storm drain where there is no paved area; that is, from the start of the exit from the A338 to the paved footpath adjacent to the pedestrian crossing. The evidence I heard at the Inquest from the investigating police officer is that cyclists use the A338 and the Blackwater Junction exit. There remains a risk that if a cyclist left the paved highway for any reason, he or she would be at risk of falling into the storm drain. In addition, if a vehicle lost control at the exit, that vehicle is at risk of leaving the highway and falling into the storm drain. A barrier between the highway and the storm drain would reduce that risk. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate roadside vehicle-restraint barriers.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install permanent timber post-and-rail fencing beside the slip road and storm drain.

Verbatim wording from the response

“I am aware that following what happened on the morning of Sunday 17 May 2020 you remain concerned that there is a risk that future deaths will occur, unless action is taken to extend the existing timber post and rail fencing along the slip road to prevent cyclists falling into the storm drain.”

Source location

2021-0165-Response-from-BCP-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 24 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent position was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Additional fencing is not appropriate because recurrence risk is low and the fencing could cause more injuries than it prevents.

Verbatim wording from the response

“(i) There remains a low risk that a similar event will re-occur at this location. (ii) The small level difference from the slip road surfacing down into the ditch is in highway design terms deemed insufficient to require protecting in the event of a vehicle leaving the carriageway. (iii) If the post and rail fencing is extended, it is as likely to cause injury to occupants of any vehicle that fails to negotiate the bends as to protect them from it. A known cause of injury and death to road users from vehicles, including motorcycles and cyclists leaving the highway and striking posts, barriers or other obstructions that are not passively safe. There is a risk therefore that a timber barrier here could create an additional safety hazard.”

Source location

2021-0165-Response-from-BCP-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 24 May 2021

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.2

  1. 1

    Continue monitoring the site and comparable locations in conjunction with the police.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 24 May 2021.
  2. 2

    Complete the A338 Blackwater Junction Improvements, including improved crossing provision and storm-drain vegetation clearance and bank protection.

    Stated by Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole CouncilStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 24 May 2021.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Continue monitoring the site and comparable locations in conjunction with the police.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In light of the above, the Council does not believe it is appropriate to introduce additional fencing to the inside of the bend on the slip road. The Council will, however, continue to monitor this site and others like it in conjunction with the police.”

Source location

2021-0165-Response-from-BCP-Council_Published
Page 3 · response
Published 24 May 2021

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Complete the A338 Blackwater Junction Improvements, including improved crossing provision and storm-drain vegetation clearance and bank protection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The A338 Blackwater Junction Improvements were completed in April 2020 and it was a project delivered jointly by Dorset and BCP Councils. The storm drain in question is designed to receive surface water runoff from the slip road through a series of road gullies situated against the kerb line. The scheme involved clearing the storm drain of vegetation and, to prevent surface water runoff from eroding its banks, concrete slabs were placed at intervals along the back of the storm drain, coinciding with each gully location.”

Source location

2021-0165-Response-from-BCP-Council_Published
Page 2 · response
Published 24 May 2021

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026