PFD report

Tony Elliott Jopson and Michael Ian Jopson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

Issued 4 May 2016•Cumbria

Report record

Published report and response evidence

This page connects the concerns raised in this report with statements found in recipients’ published responses. A link shows a clear evidence connection; it does not assign responsibility.

View original report
Concerns
1

Raised in this report

Recipients
1

Named on the report

Responses found
1

Of 1 recipient

Stated actions
6

Described in responses

Recipients and published responses

Source document

Full report text

This is the full text from the original published report.

Open published report

Concerns and recipient responses

Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

Report evidence summary

Concerns raised1

  1. Failure to provide a dual carriageway throughout the A66
    Part of recurring concern: Inadequate control of recurring collision risks at hazardous road locationsPart of recurring concern: Unsafe road design and layout
Responses linked to these concerns

Each statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.

Actions described in response An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.5

  1. Action

    Decide whether to proceed with the proposed 50 mph speed limit between A66 Appleby and Brough after considering the objection.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 May 2016.
  2. Action

    Carry out the Northern Trans-Pennine strategic study of improvements to the A66 and A69.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated in progressThe respondent said that this action was in progress when they made their response on 4 May 2016.
  3. Action

    Install average-speed cameras at A66 Kirkby Thore.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated plannedThe respondent said that this action was planned when they made their response on 4 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this individual concern was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below. Response links show a clear evidence connection; they do not assign responsibility.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Failure to provide a dual carriageway throughout the A66

Wider context from the report

“This was the first of two incidents on the A66 within three weeks. The second occurred at Warcop on the 16th June. Both involved the car carrying the deceased crossing the single carriage way into the opposite lane and a head-on collision. The A66 is the main arterial route from the A1 in the east to the M6, Scotland and Ireland. It is extremely busy carrying a great deal of large goods vehicle traffic. The road varies from excellent dual carriageway to winding country road. From a road safety perspective the road should be dual carriageway throughout otherwise avoidable deaths with continue to occur. ”

Is this part of a recurring concern?

Yes — Inadequate control of recurring collision risks at hazardous road locations; Unsafe road design and layout.

Open source report

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Decide whether to proceed with the proposed 50 mph speed limit between A66 Appleby and Brough after considering the objection.

Verbatim wording from the response

“• A66 Appleby to Brough where a package of measures are currently being introduced. These include an upgrade to the road traffic signs and road markings, an extension of the double white line system at Sandford and Warcop, installation of safety barriers in the road side verge. A reduction in the speed limit to 50 mph is also proposed. There has been an objection to the proposed lower speed limit. The objection is currently being considered and a decision on whether to proceed with the proposed lower speed limit is expected by mid July.”

Source location

2016-0172-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Carry out the Northern Trans-Pennine strategic study of improvements to the A66 and A69.

Verbatim wording from the response

“In December 2014 the Government published the first Road Investment Strategy (RIS) which marked a step change in investment in the strategic road network and committed over £15bn of expenditure in the period to 2020. The RIS also acknowledged that some of the challenges and opportunities facing the network are too large and too complex to fix in a single Road Period. Building on the feasibility study approach adopted in preparation for the RIS, the Government commissioned a series of new strategic studies, to address the biggest challenges facing the road network. One of these studies is the Northern Trans Pennine study, covering the A66 and A69.”

Source location

2016-0172-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 1 · response
Published 4 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Install average-speed cameras at A66 Kirkby Thore.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Ahead of any major upgrade to the route, safety improvements at the following locations on the A66 between the M6 and the Durham Boundary are to be delivered this financial year:”

Source location

2016-0172-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce safety measures between A66 Appleby and Brough, including upgraded signs and markings, extended double white lines and roadside safety barriers.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Ahead of any major upgrade to the route, safety improvements at the following locations on the A66 between the M6 and the Durham Boundary are to be delivered this financial year:”

Source location

2016-0172-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2016

Open published response

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Upgrade the A66 and A69 in line with the Government’s commitment.

Verbatim wording from the response

“The Chancellor announced in the 2016 Budget his commitment to upgrade the A66 and A69. The budget also announced the allocation of £75m from the Transport Development Fund to take forward the more promising recommendations from this and two other strategic studies in the north of England to enable construction to commence in the second Road Period after 2020.”

Source location

2016-0172-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2016

Open published response

Other statements in published responses

These actions and other statements could not be clearly connected to one concern in this report.

Recipient-stated actions An action is something a recipient says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to a concern raised.1

  1. 1

    Introduce a right-turn lane at A66 Brough.

    Stated by Department for TransportStated completedThe respondent said that this action was complete when they made their response on 4 May 2016.

Source evidence

How this respondent action was interpreted

PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

PFD Monitor interpretation

Introduce a right-turn lane at A66 Brough.

Verbatim wording from the response

“Ahead of any major upgrade to the route, safety improvements at the following locations on the A66 between the M6 and the Durham Boundary are to be delivered this financial year:”

Source location

2016-0172-Response-by-Department-of-Transport
Page 2 · response
Published 4 May 2016

Open published response
Back to top

Information checked against the published report and official responses · Data reviewed 7 Sep 2026 · About data quality and limitations

Official responses located
1/1

Data last updated 7 September 2026